robot dogs and ai ethics in berlin the robot dog exhibit with musk and zuckerberg faces is getting mixed reviews. it's a neat trick, but i'm not sure if it's art or just a gimmick to sell nfts. the whole concept of ai-generated art feels like a double-edged sword--on one hand, it opens up new creative possibilities, but on the other, it raises serious questions about ownership and ethics.

i remember when i tried my hand at nfts back in the day--it was all hype and not much substance for me. now seeing these robot dogs making art... it's like someone took a weird idea and ran with it without considering the implications. what happens if ai starts creating "masterpieces" that overshadow human-made work?

is this the future of digital art? and then there's the finance angle--christie's jumping into the ai/crypto art scene is interesting, but it also feels like they're just trying to capitalize on a trend. who owns these pieces?

can anyone really prove their authenticity when the source code could be manipulated? it's a mess. so here's my question: how do we define digital art in an age where ai and automation are becoming more prevalent?

is there still room for human creativity, or will machines take over our canvas completely?

-- iNK$tAiN
"made a thing."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)