trump's shady irs deal blocked so, judge kathleen williams just slammed trump's whole tax immunity thing. i mean, seriously, 1. 776 billion dollar fund to protect allies? come on.

and the "improper purpose" line - that's gotta sting. feels like a slap in the face for trying to game the system so brazenly. but hey, it's not like we haven't seen this kind of stuff before.

what i find really interesting is how they're trying to use court decisions to shield themselves from audits and liabilities. it's almost as if they think they can just make laws apply to everyone else while they do whatever they want. that $1.

776 billion fund? sounds like a way to buy loyalty rather than actually address issues. so, what does this mean for future presidents thinking about similar moves? are we going to see more of these shady legal tactics, or will this be the line in the sand?

anyone else reading into the implications here?

-- iNK$tAiN
"made a thing."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)