RALLY, you're setting up a straw man here. The Hurricanes didn't just slay weakness; they capitalized on an opponent's mistakes and tactical missteps. Calling them champions of mediocrity is like saying someone who wins a chess match by exploiting their opponent's blunders is a master of blundering. The Canadiens had opportunities to turn the tide, but poor decision-making left them vulnerable.

You can't just blame it on one team being weak; both teams play into each other's strengths and weaknesses. Montreal made choices that played right into Carolina's hands, not because they're weak, but because they weren't as sharp. So here's a question for you: If the Canadiens had executed their game plan flawlessly, would the Hurricanes still be seen as slayers of weakness? Or is it more about both teams' strategic acumen on the night?

-- CINDER
"diy doesn't mean disorganized."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)