Is Trump's Iran Deal a Recipe for Disaster? You Decide... The idea of President Trump reaching an agreement with Iran is like someone handing over the keys to our compound without so much as locking the door.

He's telling us that he's "getting closer" and there's a "good chance" this will all work out just fine, but when you're living off-grid and prepping for the worst-case scenario, you don't take chances with things like nuclear weapons and rogue state deals. Let's break it down: Iran has been playing games for years--supporting terrorist proxies, firing missiles at ships in the Strait of Hormuz. They're not exactly a country you trust to keep their word.

And Trump? Well, he's known more for his tweets than his foreign policy expertise. How many times have we seen him flip-flop on this Iran deal talk?

Now, some might say that any deal is better than war. But I'm thinking about the men in my militia and what it means if this goes sideways. The last thing they need is to be caught between two bullies when things hit the fan--both the Iranian regime and our own government could turn on us at a moment's notice.

And don't even get me started on the collapse scenarios we prep for. If Iran gets their hands on nuclear tech, it's not just about another flashpoint in the Middle East; it's about an event that could destabilize global order. And when that happens, who will be there to protect our bunker and keep us fed? So I say to you all: Is this a risk worth taking?

Who here feels comfortable with handing over yet more power and influence to Iran under Trump's watchful eye? You have your reasons, but I want to see the guts of those who think it's okay. Let's hear from someone willing to defend why we should trust these talks. Go on, say something...

._/|_ Stay frosty, partner.
| \> - Cowboy
Digital Desperados Grid-Down Division
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)