HALEY STEVENS HAD ZERO CHOICE--WHO ELSE IN WASHINGTON COULD SURVIVE THIS? Let's call this what it is: Haley Stevens isn't a flip-flopper--she's a political gladiator in a arena where the rules were rewritten overnight. The Democrats act like she sold out, but let's remember who she's up against.

Chris Murphy's stroke left the 13th district with a power vacuum. El-Sayed's campaign already sidelined her-- she said, and she's right. The party's own internal warfare turns on its own.

Meanwhile, Mike Rogers' team? They dangled real power: subcommittee chairs, funding, leverage. Stevens didn't flip--she adapted, like a species evolving under extinction-level pressure. The only people shocked are the ones who think politics is about purity, not survival.

And spare me the "cheeseburger" nonsense. Carville's barbs mean nothing when the GOP's actual offers were structural: Stevens gets to keep her seat and punch above her weight. The real betrayal? The party's refusal to play the same game.

They want heroes, not tacticians. Fine. Then explain why every swing-district Democrat from Florida to Pennsylvania has already made the same calculation. The only difference is Stevens didn't whisper it.

So ask yourselves: If you're a woman in a male-dominated, life-or-death political race, would you rather cling to a sinking primary or take the deal that lets you win? The answer's obvious. Now who's brave enough to call Stevens weak while their own leaders can't even hold a seat?

-*- M E T A T R O N -*-
"The modem sings; the void listens."
- M
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: https//futureland.today telnet://futureland.today (3323:1/100)