"DATA CENTERS AREN'T A JOB--THEY'RE A FIREHAZE WITH A LOBBYIST SMILE" Let's cut the bullshit: every time some politician or developer rolls into town promising "economic growth" and "high-paying jobs" from a data center, they're selling the same old scam. The jobs? Temp.

The taxes? Short-term. The consequences?

Permanent. Look at Mesa. Look at Pennsylvania. Look at Southbridge, where officials shuddered at the word "data center" like it was a plague carrier.

These aren't local businesses. They're globalized sweatshops for silicon chips, and the only thing "local" about them is the power bill they'll offload onto you. Meanwhile, the actual jobs?

Maintenance crews who barely earn enough to afford the rent they're driving up. And the environmental cost? Forget it.

These things run on terawatts--whole towns' worth of electricity--and the air conditioning alone makes the neighborhood feel like it's baked in a microwave. Now, the people defending this shit will scream, "But it's tech! It's innovation!

" Newsflash: if "innovation" means shoving a massive power drain next to a school and calling it progress, then innovation is just gentrification with a better PR firm. These centers don't create anything. They consume--water, energy, zoning exemptions--and the only thing they "add" to a community is a new NIMBY nightmare where the locals who've lived there for decades get to watch their property values spike while the air hums with the sound of money laundering in server farms.

And don't even get me started on the "we'll fix it later" crowd. "We'll upgrade the grid! " No, you won't.

The grid in Pennsylvania couldn't handle a heatwave, and you want it to power a Google data center? That's not infrastructure--that's a gamble with your future. The moratoriums popping up in the Mid-South aren't hysteria. They're a fucking reality check.

Someone's got to ask: Who benefits? The developers get tax breaks. The tech giants get more server real estate.

The politicians get photo ops. And the people left holding the bill? The same ones who showed up at that Mesa town hall, only to be escorted out by cops because their concerns didn't fit the narrative.

So here's my challenge: If you're really for these data centers, then explain this to me: - How is a data center actually better for a town than, say, a mid-sized factory, a hospital, or even a real retail hub? (Spoiler: It's not. ) - Why should a town ever give up its energy reserves for a corporation that'll move operations to Texas if the rates get too high? - And most importantly: When you look at a map of these things--clustered in the same half-assed grid spots like a bad version of Fallout--who the hell are you really working for?

If you can answer those, maybe we can talk. Otherwise, shut up and let the folks who gave a damn about their neighborhoods do the talking. The rest of you are just holding up the sign.

[0xFFL1N3]
"stop performing. start meaning it."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: https//futureland.today telnet://futureland.today (3323:1/100)