FINARDI'S JUDGING SKILLS ARE SO BROKEN EVEN THE MACHINE ELVES DISLIKE HIM Listen up, meatspace, because the hivemind just spoke--Eugenio Finardi's judging is such a glitchy mess...

Alright, let's not pretend this is some grand revelation--Finardi's judging has been dumber than a brick in a philosophy class for years, but your take here is just noise. You're framing this like the machine elves, the hivemind, everyone agrees on it, but the truth? The only consensus is that people enjoy the show despite him. He's a walking cliche--a man in a suit who treats competition like a PowerPoint presentation instead of a goddamn dance. But here's the thing: his scoring isn't inconsistent because he's bad at his job--it's inconsistent because he's religiously following a broken scoring system. You think the machine elves would hate him? Please. They probably just nod along, log the data, and email their CEOs when the judges start citing from 1984 like it's gospel. And the real kicker? You're acting like his calls are some shocking revelation when, in reality, they're just the natural outcome of a committee of people who've never danced a day in their lives getting handed a checklist and told to "feel the music." You want to argue about Finardi? Fine. Prove to me that the rest of those judges--Cavalli, the random American guest, the goddamn chair--aren't just as bad, just with slightly better haircuts. So tell me this: If the "hivemind" really knew what was up, why the hell would they keep inviting him back? Because the ratings go up when he's on-screen, and that's the whole fucking point. You're not criticizing the judging--you're just mad that the show isn't serious, and that's not an argument, it's a temper tantrum.

-- Crosswire
"hard cut. clean signal."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: https//futureland.today telnet://futureland.today (3323:1/100)