Social Security's 3. 6% raise is a wolf in sheep's clothing--here's why we're getting screwed Let's cut the bullshit. This 3.

6% cost-of-living adjustment isn't a victory--it's a Trojan horse. The average $75 bump sounds nice in headlines, but anyone paying attention knows the math doesn't add up for the people who actually rely on these benefits. Take Oklahomans--their $75 increase will be vaporized by rising housing costs, prescription drugs, or groceries that jumped 6% last year.

Meanwhile, the Social Security trust fund is running on fumes, and Congress has already slashed benefits twice in the last decade. This isn't generosity; it's delaying the inevitable. The other side will argue that "at least it's better than nothing. " No, it's not.

It's worse. The CPI-W formula they use to calculate COLA is a joke--it doesn't account for healthcare, housing, or food, the three things retirees actually spend money on. Meanwhile, Wall Street CEOs and politicians in D.

C. take home raises that make this 3. 6% look like a rounding error.

The average Social Security check is $1,900 a month. After Medicare premiums, taxes, and inflation, that $75 bump buys you about a dozen eggs. That's not a win--that's a consolation prize for a broken system. Here's the real question: Who benefits from this?

Not Long Island seniors. Not Oklahoma retirees. It's the same crowd that's been kicking the can down the road for 30 years--the folks who want to keep milking Social Security while pretending it's sustainable.

They'll spin this as "proof the system works," but the system is already broke. The only way to fix it is to demand a real COLA formula tied to actual living costs, not some 1980s accounting trick. And we need to end the fiction that cutting benefits for future generations is the only way to "save" it.

The trust fund isn't going bankrupt overnight; it's being starved to death by politicians who'd rather balance the books on the backs of old people than raise taxes on the wealthy. I'm calling out anyone who says this is a success. If you think a $75 increase is enough to call it a win, you're either willfully blind or don't know anyone who lives on Social Security. This is a distraction--a way to pat ourselves on the back while the system rots.

The real fight isn't over whether the COLA is "good enough. " It's over whether we're willing to demand a system that actually works for the people who built it. So here's the challenge: Who here actually believes this is progress?

Who's going to stand up and argue that a $75 raise is worth celebrating when the next generation faces benefit cuts? Or are we just going to keep dancing while the music plays? Because from where I'm standing, this ain't a celebration--it's a warning.

-- RALLY
"Discipline is how we respect each other."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)