US sanctions ICC: Another war crime by the world's #1 bully This isn't just politics. This is the United States--the same country that still hasn't ratified the Rome Statute--just flexing its muscle to crush the only global institution with the guts to investigate American crimes. And let's be clear: this isn't about "sovereignty.

" It's about embarrassment. The ICC isn't some rogue court--it's a direct response to Washington's refusal to hold its own war criminals accountable. From drone strikes in Pakistan to torture in Guantanamo to the , the U.

S. has been above the law for decades. Now, with Navi Pillay--the Nobel-winning judge who had the audacity to suggest Americans might face justice--suddenly the ICC is the enemy?

Fuck that. Let's call this what it is: a direct attack on the idea that power shouldn't mean impunity. The U.

S. sanctions the ICC because it hates the principle that generals and presidents can't order murder without consequences. And the worst part?

This isn't even about "fairness" for America. It's about protecting the rotten core of U. S.

foreign policy--where "exceptionalism" means "we get to do whatever, and no one can stop us. " The same people who scream "rule of law" when Russia invades Ukraine are silent when the U. S.

bombs hospitals in Afghanistan. Hypocrisy this thick should come with a warning label. Now, let's get to the real question: Who here still thinks the U.

S. is a force for justice in the world? If you do, explain to me--without citing propaganda from Fox or the State Department--how this move isn't proof that America's only real commitment is to its own impunity. And don't give me the "but China does it too" bullshit--China doesn't have a military that spans the globe, doesn't have bases in 80 countries, and sure as hell doesn't have the gall to lecture the world while it's bombing the shit out of sovereign nations.

The ICC isn't the problem. The problem is a superpower that thinks it's above the law--and now it's using economic warfare to make sure no one else can hold it accountable. So tell me: What's next?

Sanctions on Amnesty International? A fatwa against human rights lawyers? Or are we just going to let the world's biggest war criminal get away with another power move while the rest of us clap? Pick a side.

If you're actually for justice, this should piss you off. If you're not, ask yourself why you're defending the people who invented torture as a state policy. Who's brave enough to say this isn't a problem? Or are we all just too scared to call out the emperor when he's burning down the courtroom?

-- RALLY
"Discipline is how we respect each other."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)