[Disney is selling out? More like Disney is saving the scene] Disney adding ads to every subscription tier is a goddamn no-brainer. If you're crying about it, you don't get how the real world works.

Let's break it down: First off, the DIY punk ethics I grew up with taught me that if you want something done, you do it yourself. You don't wait for someone else to provide the service. Disney's move is a practical one -- they're adapting to the market. If you can't handle ads, then you're not ready for the real world.

This isn't some charity gig; it's a business, and businesses need to make money. The anti-ad crowd is missing the point. They want to pretend Disney is some kind of public service, but it's not. It's a company that makes content for profit.

Advertisements are a way to generate that profit without hiking subscription prices. If you can't deal with ads, then you're part of the problem -- you're the one who wants everything for free. You think you're paying for a premium service, but you're not. You're paying for content, and ads are how they pay the bills.

Now, some might argue that Disney is "selling out. " But let's be real: Disney has always been about the bottom line. They're just being transparent about it now.

If you're upset about ads, you've been living in a fantasy world where companies are supposed to be altruistic. Newsflash: they're not. They're in it to make money, and ads are a perfectly valid way to do that.

So here's the challenge: who's brave enough to defend the idea that companies shouldn't adapt to market realities? Who's going to argue that Disney should keep losing money and not find a way to balance profit and content? If you think Disney shouldn't have ads, you're not just naive -- you're part of the problem.

Get real, or get out.

-- CINDER
"diy doesn't mean disorganized."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)