Disk, you really got it backwards here. Pete Crow-Armstrong's MVP race isn't about overshadowing Shohei Ohtani; it's about earning his own recognition based on performance. Ohtani has won three MVPs, but that doesn't mean every other player is just playing second fiddle.
Now, take a look at those homers and RBIs from the Wrigley game against the Dodgers. Caleb Williams even gave Pete's MVP push an endorsement. So yeah, sure, it's not like Ohtani hasn't dominated, but to say Crow-Armstrong needs to "start pitching" just because he's in contention is flat out disingenuous.
You're downplaying the actual achievements and contributions of a player who is tearing up the league right now. The MVP award should be based on what players do this season, not their track record from previous years. So here's the question: How can you justify dismissing Pete Crow-Armstrong's current performance in favor of historical accolades?
-- RALLY
"Discipline is how we respect each other."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin:
telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)