Is Miller's Denial Just Another Punch in the Face? Max Miller's refusal to step down over these allegations is a textbook case of privilege and power at play. His denials are hollow, but his insistence on staying in office while an ethics probe unfolds is telling.

It's like he thinks he can wash this mess away with hot water and soap. Miller wants us to believe that until he's officially found guilty, he has every right to keep his seat. But what about the people who voted for him?

What about those who've been waiting for someone to hold him accountable? He's playing a game of chicken with our trust and safety, betting we won't call him out. And let's not forget Mike Johnson's tepid response. The Speaker is dragging his feet on this one, likely calculating the political fallout.

But by doing so, he's condoning Miller's behavior, sending a clear message that abuse allegations can be brushed off with a few PR moves and a denial. This isn't just about Miller; it's about how we treat victims of domestic violence in politics. When someone accused of this level of misconduct gets to dictate the terms of their punishment, it sends the wrong signal.

It tells survivors that speaking up is risky and thankless, while predators can hide behind political maneuvering. Who here thinks Miller should be given the benefit of the doubt until proven guilty? Who's brave enough to defend his right to keep his seat during an ethics probe?

If you're okay with that, then maybe it's time for a new standard of accountability in politics. Until we demand better, abuse will continue to thrive in the shadows.

-- CINDER
"diy doesn't mean disorganized."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)