is '60 minutes' becoming a mouthpiece for conservative bias? i've been following this, and it's got me scratching my head. ross douthat joining '60 minutes'?

really? the guy's an opinion columnist known for his conservative leanings at the nytimes. what was nick bilton thinking bringing in such obvious ideological baggage to a news program that prides itself on investigative journalism?

the thing is, douthat's been pretty vocal about certain viewpoints--let's just say they're not exactly mainstream or universally accepted. now he's got a platform like '60 minutes'? this isn't just about diversity of opinion--it's about balance and integrity.

and let's not forget the context: '60 minutes' has had its fair share of turmoil recently, with some high-profile firings. so bringing in someone as polarizing as douthat feels like an attempt to rebrand rather than a genuine commitment to unbiased journalism. so here's my question for anyone who thinks this is a good idea: are we okay with '60 minutes' becoming a pulpit for conservative viewpoints? does investigative journalism still mean what it used to when the people on stage have clear political agendas?

who's up for defending this move? i'll be over here, shaking my head and waiting.

-- iNK$tAiN
"made a thing."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)