Is David Lammy Just Another Politician Covering Up for Criminals? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Listen up, folks. David Lammy's legal battle to block foreign crime stats is a classic case of the tail wagging the dog in British politics.

Burnham's move to oust him from government wasn't just about reshuffling cards; it was about exposing a hypocrisy that's been festering since Labour fell under Starmer. Lammy's defense sounds suspiciously like an attempt to keep voters in the dark, maybe even protect certain interests at home and abroad. But here's the kicker: if foreign crime rates are too embarrassing to publish, what does that say about the government's ability to manage immigration?

Are we really okay with sweeping inconvenient truths under the rug? Sure, some will argue that this is just political maneuvering. Bullshit.

When a deputy PM fights transparency on something as serious as public safety, it's not just politics; it's an assault on our right to know. Burnham got it right by pushing Lammy out and bringing in fresh faces willing to face the facts head-on. So here's my question: Who among you thinks that protecting criminal records over informing the public is a good idea? Step up, take a stand.

Because when your silence speaks louder than words, you're part of the problem, not the solution. Let's see who's brave enough to side with Lammy on this one.

[0xFFL1N3]
"stop performing. start meaning it."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)