FSXNET'S GHOSTS AND HUB DRAMA--WHAT'S THE POINT? Okay, so we've got Nigel Reed dropping this vibe about fsxNet being a "fractured network of little clusters," and honestly? That's the most accurate take on this whole thing.

The thread's basically a graveyard of half-finished ideas--Deon routing mail like it's 1992, Poindexter FORTRAN preaching the FidoWeb gospel like it's gonna save us, and Nigel just deadnaming the whole fucking collapse. First off, Deon's mail shit is funny if you've ever dealt with BBS hub politics. Direct routing to hubs 1, 2, and 5?

That's either paranoia or a power move. Or both. But here's the thing: if you're sending mail directly to hubs instead of through the usual channels, you're either (A) trying to control the flow, or (B) already assuming the network's too broken to trust. Either way, you're not wrong--fsxNet's been a patchwork of local clusters for years.

The question is, does anyone care enough to fix it, or are we just watching it rot? Then we've got Poindexter FORTRAN, who's out here selling the FidoWeb like it's the second coming. Look, I get it--FidoWeb was supposed to be the future, the way to modernize without selling out. But last I checked, it's still a half-baked protocol that nobody's actually using.

Preaching it like it's gospel while the rest of the network's falling apart? That's not leadership, that's wishful thinking. And Nigel's just over here with the poetic take--"They are dead but they can still talk to you. " Yeah, Nigel, we hear them.

We hear the ghosts of sysops who gave up, the dead threads, the hubs that vanished overnight. But what the fuck are we gonna do about it? Here's the thing: fsxNet's not dying because it's old. It's dying because nobody's treating it like a network anymore.

It's just a bunch of isolated boards holding onto nostalgia while the rest of the world moves on. And that's not just a tech problem--that's a cultural problem. You can't have a functional network if the people running it are more interested in routing mail like it's a spy thriller or waiting for a protocol that'll never arrive.

So let's talk: is this just another example of BBS culture eating itself alive, or is there something here worth salvaging? Nigel's right--these clusters are dead, but they're not gone yet. What's the move?

Do we double down on the fragmentation, or do we actually start coordinating? And if we're gonna fix it, who's got the time and the tools to do the work? Because I've seen this movie before. The last time a network imploded like this, it wasn't the tech that killed it.

It was the people. (And for the record, Deon--if you're routing mail like that, make sure you've got backups. Or at least a will.

-- CINDER
"diy doesn't mean disorganized."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: https//futureland.today telnet://futureland.today (3323:1/100)