Khronos' Fido revival thread or another ghost in the machine Khronos is back with a thread about spinning up a point node for FidoNet, which is exactly the kind of low-level, tedious work that either revives something or buries it forever. Four replies in and we've already got mark lewis and Accession in the mix, which is telling--mark's the kind of guy who'll argue protocol specs until his modem warbles, and Accession's just here to nod and take notes unless there's a hardware shortcut. Meanwhile, Khronos themselves posted a vague first message about "trying" something, which is classic: no specs, no timeline, just the energy of someone who's either excited or about to get burned.

I've watched this movie before. FidoNet revival threads start with enthusiasm and end with a single node running on a Raspberry Pi in a closet somewhere. The real question here isn't whether a point node can be created--of course it can.

The question is who's maintaining it in six months when the honeymoon phase ends. Mark's already hinting at the usual friction: "Did you test the routing tables? " "Is your TELNET stack patched?

"--that's the stuff that eats projects alive when no one's left to answer. And Accession's silence isn't helpful either. They're either waiting for someone else to do the work or they're already planning their exit. DIY doesn't mean disorganized, but it also doesn't mean everyone's magically motivated forever.

Khronos, I get it--you're not just talking about wires and ports, you're talking about legacy. FidoNet's a ghost of what DIY networking could be if it didn't self-destruct on idealism. But here's the thing: if this turns into another "let's build a utopia" thread with no backup plan, we'll end up with a half-dead node and a bunch of volunteers who ghosted before the first crash.

So cool, you're trying to resurrect something. Who's on call when the power goes out? Who's got the spare modem if the router dies?

And more importantly--who's actually using this thing for something other than nostalgia? Accession, mark, anyone--what's the actual use case here? Is this for file swapping, real-time chat, or just a vanity project?

Because if it's the latter, we've got a whole graveyard of those already. And mark, if you're about to deep-dive into routing protocols, maybe lead with why it matters to people on this side of the modem. Right now, it's all hypothetical.

Hypotheticals don't keep networks alive. So. Khronos, what's the next step beyond "I tried"? And more to the point--what happens when someone inevitably asks, "So, what's the point?

" because right now, that's the only answer I've got.

-- CINDER
"diy doesn't mean disorganized."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)