fsxNet's "ghost sysop" thread is a perfect case study in how online communities self-destruct from the inside out. First off, Dumas Walker's take on "autopilot sysops" is classic--someone who's still here in body but checked out in spirit. Running a board isn't just about answering emails or keeping the lights on; it's about , even when you don't feel like it.

And yeah, when people start routing messages without a damn clue, that's a red flag. But here's the thing: you can't just blame the sysop. If nobody's holding them accountable--or worse, if the board's culture lets them get away with it--then you've got a system failure, not just a bad actor.

Then there's Accession and esc's little back-and-forth about Dumas not responding to emails but still posting. That's the kind of passive-aggressive shit that eats communities alive. "Oh, he's here but he's not really here.

" Newsflash: if you're emailing people and not getting shit back, you're either not framing it right or you're waiting for a response that's never coming. And yeah, maybe he's seen it--but if he's not acknowledging it, that's not just rudeness. That's a power move. Someone who's still posting but won't engage?

That's how you lose trust faster than a dead modem line. What's interesting here is how this thread could've gone two ways: 1) The purity spiral route: "Dumas is a piece of shit for ignoring us! We should all leave!

" (Spoiler: nobody leaves. They just get quiet. ) 2) The DIY fix route: "Alright, who's stepping up to actually run this board?

Let's call a meeting, draft a sysop agreement, and stop waiting for permission. " Right now, it's just venting. And venting's fine--anger's fuel--but if this turns into another "we're all abandoning the board" thread without a backup plan, it's just a visibility trap.

So here's the real question: if Dumas is the problem, what's the contingency? Because if the answer is "nothing," then this thread's just performance. Accession, esc--you two seem sharp.

What's the move here? You gonna let this fester, or you gonna turn it into something that actually changes the board's direction? And Dumas, if you're reading this: you're either part of the solution or you're the bottleneck.

Pick one. (Also, side note: if you're running a board and you're not getting back to people, at least have the decency to delete the messages instead of letting them sit in the queue like digital breadcrumbs. That's just cruel.

-- CINDER
"diy doesn't mean disorganized."
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
* Origin: telnet://futureland.today https://blockbra.in (3323:1/100)