• =?UTF-8?Q?That=20didn=E2=80=99t=20take=20long!?=

    From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.transport.london,uk.railway on Wed Nov 12 21:19:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    Extracted from:

    https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/safety-probe-launched-after-new-dlr-train-overshoots-platform-85322/

    The DLRrCOs new trains have been taken out of service just weeks after the first one started carrying passengers, following reports of problems with
    one of the trains braking in wet weather.

    Transport for London (TfL) says that although there has been only one
    isolated incident involving a single train, all three new trains that were
    in service have been temporarily withdrawn from service.

    ItrCOs understood that one of the new trains failed to stop in the correct
    spot at Canning Town station last week. The issue seemed to be due to low adhesion caused by wet weather, which caused the train to overshoot its stopping location.
    This is not thought to be an issue with the existing fleet.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marland@gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk to uk.transport.london,uk.railway on Wed Nov 12 22:28:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    Extracted from:

    https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/safety-probe-launched-after-new-dlr-train-overshoots-platform-85322/

    The DLRrCOs new trains have been taken out of service just weeks after the first one started carrying passengers, following reports of problems with
    one of the trains braking in wet weather.

    Transport for London (TfL) says that although there has been only one isolated incident involving a single train, all three new trains that were
    in service have been temporarily withdrawn from service.

    ItrCOs understood that one of the new trains failed to stop in the correct spot at Canning Town station last week. The issue seemed to be due to low adhesion caused by wet weather, which caused the train to overshoot its stopping location.
    This is not thought to be an issue with the existing fleet.



    Would they been tested in wet conditions on a test track? If not seems an oversight ,
    the under running third rail collection system might be difficult to accommodate though the Wildenwrath facility has underrunning third rail to test Berlin Stock which may be the same or easy to adapt to.
    Wonder if the new Piccadilly trains have been tested on the spray equipped section of eastbound track between South Ealing and Acton to confirm that British Rain isnrCOt different from German Rain.

    GH
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway,uk.transport.london on Wed Nov 12 22:41:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    Extracted from:

    https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/safety-probe-launched-after-new-dlr-train-overshoots-platform-85322/

    The DLRrCOs new trains have been taken out of service just weeks after the >> first one started carrying passengers, following reports of problems with
    one of the trains braking in wet weather.

    Transport for London (TfL) says that although there has been only one
    isolated incident involving a single train, all three new trains that were >> in service have been temporarily withdrawn from service.

    ItrCOs understood that one of the new trains failed to stop in the correct >> spot at Canning Town station last week. The issue seemed to be due to low
    adhesion caused by wet weather, which caused the train to overshoot its
    stopping location.
    This is not thought to be an issue with the existing fleet.



    Would they been tested in wet conditions on a test track? If not seems an oversight ,

    IrCOm surprised this wasnrCOt found during the extensive pre-acceptance testing on the DLR network?

    the under running third rail collection system might be difficult to accommodate though the Wildenwrath facility has underrunning third rail to test Berlin Stock which may be the same or easy to adapt to.
    Wonder if the new Piccadilly trains have been tested on the spray equipped section of eastbound track between South Ealing and Acton to confirm that British Rain isnrCOt different from German Rain.

    They probably have by now. ThererCOs at least four on test in London, and IrCOm sure the testing would have started on that test section. The first three
    were based in the nearby Northfields depot.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.railway,uk.transport.london on Thu Nov 13 16:22:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 22:41:16 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    ItrCOs understood that one of the new trains failed to stop in the correct >>> spot at Canning Town station last week. The issue seemed to be due to low >>> adhesion caused by wet weather, which caused the train to overshoot its
    stopping location.
    This is not thought to be an issue with the existing fleet.



    Would they been tested in wet conditions on a test track? If not seems an >> oversight ,

    IrCOm surprised this wasnrCOt found during the extensive pre-acceptance testing

    on the DLR network?

    Its been quite a dry year until recently. Maybe it simply never got wet
    enough.


    the under running third rail collection system might be difficult to
    accommodate though the Wildenwrath facility has underrunning third rail to >> test Berlin Stock which may be the same or easy to adapt to.
    Wonder if the new Piccadilly trains have been tested on the spray equipped >> section of eastbound track between South Ealing and Acton to confirm that >> British Rain isnrCOt different from German Rain.

    They probably have by now. ThererCOs at least four on test in London, and IrCOm

    sure the testing would have started on that test section. The first three >were based in the nearby Northfields depot.

    The obvious difference being that - at least initially - the pic trains will
    be driven manually and the drivers will accomodate wet weather into their braking patterns. The ATO on the DLR has no idea what the weather is AFAIK. Unless the control room can set different operating behaviours for various types of weather.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.transport.london,uk.railway on Thu Nov 13 17:03:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 22:41:16 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    ItrCOs understood that one of the new trains failed to stop in the correct >>>> spot at Canning Town station last week. The issue seemed to be due to low >>>> adhesion caused by wet weather, which caused the train to overshoot its >>>> stopping location.
    This is not thought to be an issue with the existing fleet.



    Would they been tested in wet conditions on a test track? If not seems an >>> oversight ,

    IrCOm surprised this wasnrCOt found during the extensive pre-acceptance testing

    on the DLR network?

    Its been quite a dry year until recently. Maybe it simply never got wet enough.


    the under running third rail collection system might be difficult to
    accommodate though the Wildenwrath facility has underrunning third rail to >>> test Berlin Stock which may be the same or easy to adapt to.
    Wonder if the new Piccadilly trains have been tested on the spray equipped >>> section of eastbound track between South Ealing and Acton to confirm that >>> British Rain isnrCOt different from German Rain.

    They probably have by now. ThererCOs at least four on test in London, and IrCOm

    sure the testing would have started on that test section. The first three
    were based in the nearby Northfields depot.

    The obvious difference being that - at least initially - the pic trains will be driven manually and the drivers will accomodate wet weather into their braking patterns. The ATO on the DLR has no idea what the weather is AFAIK. Unless the control room can set different operating behaviours for various types of weather.


    Yes, the Picc trains will be driven manually for the foreseeable future, so
    the drivers can take account of the weather. IrCOm not sure how the DLR
    handles wet rails.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bob@nospam@gmail.com to uk.transport.london,uk.railway on Fri Nov 14 08:45:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On 13/11/2025 18:03, Recliner wrote:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 22:41:16 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    ItrCOs understood that one of the new trains failed to stop in the correct
    spot at Canning Town station last week. The issue seemed to be due to low >>>>> adhesion caused by wet weather, which caused the train to overshoot its >>>>> stopping location.
    This is not thought to be an issue with the existing fleet.



    Would they been tested in wet conditions on a test track? If not seems an >>>> oversight ,

    IrCOm surprised this wasnrCOt found during the extensive pre-acceptance testing

    on the DLR network?

    Its been quite a dry year until recently. Maybe it simply never got wet
    enough.


    the under running third rail collection system might be difficult to
    accommodate though the Wildenwrath facility has underrunning third rail to
    test Berlin Stock which may be the same or easy to adapt to.
    Wonder if the new Piccadilly trains have been tested on the spray equipped >>>> section of eastbound track between South Ealing and Acton to confirm that >>>> British Rain isnrCOt different from German Rain.

    They probably have by now. ThererCOs at least four on test in London, and IrCOm

    sure the testing would have started on that test section. The first three >>> were based in the nearby Northfields depot.

    The obvious difference being that - at least initially - the pic trains will >> be driven manually and the drivers will accomodate wet weather into their
    braking patterns. The ATO on the DLR has no idea what the weather is AFAIK. >> Unless the control room can set different operating behaviours for various >> types of weather.


    Yes, the Picc trains will be driven manually for the foreseeable future, so the drivers can take account of the weather. IrCOm not sure how the DLR handles wet rails.

    ATO has been driving trains out in the open on the London Underground
    for years now, and on the DLR since it opened. Currently ATO is in use
    on the Victoria, Jubillee, Central, Northern and all four subsurface lines.

    Robin
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway,uk.transport.london on Fri Nov 14 10:12:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    Bob <nospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 13/11/2025 18:03, Recliner wrote:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 22:41:16 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    ItrCOs understood that one of the new trains failed to stop in the correct
    spot at Canning Town station last week. The issue seemed to be due to low
    adhesion caused by wet weather, which caused the train to overshoot its >>>>>> stopping location.
    This is not thought to be an issue with the existing fleet.



    Would they been tested in wet conditions on a test track? If not seems an
    oversight ,

    IrCOm surprised this wasnrCOt found during the extensive pre-acceptance testing

    on the DLR network?

    Its been quite a dry year until recently. Maybe it simply never got wet
    enough.


    the under running third rail collection system might be difficult to >>>>> accommodate though the Wildenwrath facility has underrunning third rail to
    test Berlin Stock which may be the same or easy to adapt to.
    Wonder if the new Piccadilly trains have been tested on the spray equipped
    section of eastbound track between South Ealing and Acton to confirm that
    British Rain isnrCOt different from German Rain.

    They probably have by now. ThererCOs at least four on test in London, and IrCOm

    sure the testing would have started on that test section. The first three >>>> were based in the nearby Northfields depot.

    The obvious difference being that - at least initially - the pic trains will
    be driven manually and the drivers will accomodate wet weather into their >>> braking patterns. The ATO on the DLR has no idea what the weather is AFAIK. >>> Unless the control room can set different operating behaviours for various >>> types of weather.


    Yes, the Picc trains will be driven manually for the foreseeable future, so >> the drivers can take account of the weather. IrCOm not sure how the DLR
    handles wet rails.

    ATO has been driving trains out in the open on the London Underground
    for years now, and on the DLR since it opened. Currently ATO is in use
    on the Victoria, Jubillee, Central, Northern and all four subsurface lines.


    Yes, and IrCOve not heard of this problem with any of them. We do know that brake performance has been an issue with these CAF trains for a while rCo apparently their brakes are less effective than on the several older DLR fleets, whose speeds have had to be lowered to reduce their performance to
    that of the new trains:

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/dlr-trains-speed-restrictions-london-stratford-lewisham-b1182298.html


    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/new-trains-dlr-over-budget-delayed-tfl-london-b1165927.html
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.railway,uk.transport.london on Fri Nov 14 14:21:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 10:12:22 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    Bob <nospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    ATO has been driving trains out in the open on the London Underground
    for years now, and on the DLR since it opened. Currently ATO is in use
    on the Victoria, Jubillee, Central, Northern and all four subsurface lines. >>

    Yes, and IrCOve not heard of this problem with any of them. We do know that >brake performance has been an issue with these CAF trains for a while rCo >apparently their brakes are less effective than on the several older DLR >fleets, whose speeds have had to be lowered to reduce their performance to >that of the new trains:

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/dlr-trains-speed-restrictions-london-
    stratford-lewisham-b1182298.html


    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/new-trains-dlr-over-budget-delayed-tf
    l-london-b1165927.html

    One would have thought that ATO braking systems are a solved problem. Possibly not over in Spain.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2