• Re: Sale of ITV

    From Julian Macassey@julian@n6are.com to uk.tech.broadcast on Sun Jan 4 03:57:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 18:38:50 +0000 (GMT), Bob Latham <bob@coward> wrote:

    A socialist hellscape awaits, It's started already.

    That will be a welcome change.
    --
    The NHS will last as long as there are folk left with faith to
    fight for it. - Aneurin Bevan
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Williamson@johnwilliamson@btinternet.com to uk.tech.broadcast on Tue Dec 2 21:18:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 02/12/2025 19:48, Scott wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 19:10:14 +0000, JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> wrote:

    On 01/12/2025 16:37, Scott wrote:
    But what would you expect the outcome of a referendum to be on the
    licence fee? That was my underlying question.

    Similar to a referendum on the price of newspapers campaigning against
    the BBC or the cost of ITV and CH4 that is passed on the consumers
    through the cost of advertising.

    Exactly. I am asking the likely outcome of a single question
    referendum on the abolition of the licence fee, with options 'Yes' or
    'No'. I am not saying that I support abolition.

    If the question were to be phrased as "Should the BBC licence fee be abolished?" with no mention of alternative funding models, the answer
    would probably be a resounding YES!!!!.

    Now ask how people would prefer that it be funded with all sensible alternatives getting a mention... (Subscription, pay per view, adverts, Government grant, licence fee...)
    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bob Latham@bob@sick-of-spam.invalid to uk.tech.broadcast on Wed Dec 3 10:44:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    In article <10gnpff$2jll1$4@dont-email.me>,
    J. P. Gilliver <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    Personally, I am very much pro-BBC, with all its faults. I am
    aware, however, that this is a declining opinion, especially among
    the young. I think it is something - like the NHS - that is part of
    the fabric of the nation; but, I am aware that increasing numbers
    think otherwise.

    So I conclude you like be lied to or at least, you like the lies they
    tell.

    For me and for millions like me, it gives me no pleasure to call for
    the end of the BBC, none at all. I would much prefer the BBC to
    return to reason, rationality, truth and drop agendas and wokeness.

    The BBC is an activist propaganda machine not a news outlet.

    Just drop the bullshit, Climate science like all science is NOT
    settled, biological sex immutable, Britain has done more good than
    barm to the world by far, etc. etc. etc. . it's simple, tell the
    bloody truth instead of Islington woke BS.

    So because they will not tell the truth they do not serve the needs
    of the vast majority of the country, so what's the good of paying for
    them at all?

    I'll make a prediction, if the polls continue to predict a Reform
    government, the BBC will turn everything they have against Farage and
    co., no hint of truth will remain. As a teenager he ate live animals
    and was for ever doing nazi salutes, don't worry, the BBC can always
    find activists to make these claims. Master mind champion and useful
    idiot Lammy has already claimed he hung around with the Hitler youth,
    19 years before he was born.

    Do you remember being told if we voted Brexit we would have no drugs,
    no green salad and a lot more besides and for some reason even our
    water supply was threatened. It will be worse for Reform much, much
    worse. The BBC is an activist propaganda machine not a news outlet.

    As a national broadcaster paid for by taxation it should be neutral
    and fair, stop laughing at the back.

    Bob.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2