• BibleGateway

    From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Fri Sep 12 20:12:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    I don't know whether any of you use BibleGateway.com? I do from
    time-to-time. Apparently it is off-line in Britain and Europe for
    "technical reasons", which https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibleGateway
    says that they are trying to resolve. However they obviously do not
    expect a speedy resolution because they are refunding anyone with paid subscription and have warned that any saved material - bookmarks or
    personal study notes - will be deleted.

    The good news is that the site can still be accessed via a VPN.

    Some have suggested that it is due to censorship from Ofcom or because
    of the new online protection legislation - you have to sign in because
    you might be subject to "hate speech" (ie. the Bible) on the website. I
    don't know whether that is so or not, but nothing would surprise me in Starmer's Britain.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Sat Sep 13 15:58:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 12/09/2025 20:12, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    I don't know whether any of you use BibleGateway.com? I do from time-to- time. Apparently it is off-line in Britain and Europe for "technical reasons", which https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibleGateway says that
    they are trying to resolve. However they obviously do not expect a
    speedy resolution because they are refunding anyone with paid
    subscription and have warned that any saved material - bookmarks or
    personal study notes - will be deleted.

    The good news is that the site can still be accessed via a VPN.

    May I suggest if you still want to access Bible Gateway you use Opera.
    It has a built in vpn that you just click on to bypass any website that
    has restricted access due to the online safety act.

    Alternatively use the one I use, https://biblehub.com/ I find it miles
    better than Bible Gateway.


    Some have suggested that it is due to censorship from Ofcom or because
    of the new online protection legislation - you have to sign in because
    you might be subject to "hate speech" (ie. the Bible) on the website. I don't know whether that is so or not, but nothing would surprise me in Starmer's Britain.

    It's down to individual sites whether they want to restrict access or
    not, although if they don't and Ofcom disagrees, then they're liable to
    hefty fines. Anything blatantly in danger of being potentially harmful
    to children, such as porn sites or suicide sites etc, will be restricted
    by the site owners if they have half a brain, but I wouldn't have
    thought sites such as Bible Gateway would have anything to worry about.

    Incidentally the Online Safety Act is a Conservative Act, which they
    didn't implement whilst in power.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Goodge@usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk to uk.religion.christian on Sat Sep 13 21:59:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 20:12:15 +0100, "Kendall K. Down" <kendallkdown@googlemail.com> wrote:

    I don't know whether any of you use BibleGateway.com? I do from >time-to-time. Apparently it is off-line in Britain and Europe for
    "technical reasons", which https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibleGateway
    says that they are trying to resolve. However they obviously do not
    expect a speedy resolution because they are refunding anyone with paid >subscription and have warned that any saved material - bookmarks or
    personal study notes - will be deleted.

    The good news is that the site can still be accessed via a VPN.

    Some have suggested that it is due to censorship from Ofcom or because
    of the new online protection legislation - you have to sign in because
    you might be subject to "hate speech" (ie. the Bible) on the website. I >don't know whether that is so or not, but nothing would surprise me in >Starmer's Britain.

    It can't be due to UK legislation if it's also offline in other European countries. That much is obvious with even a brief moment's thought. And it's not offline in every EU country, either.

    Mark



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Sun Sep 14 03:36:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 13/09/2025 21:59, Mark Goodge wrote:

    It can't be due to UK legislation if it's also offline in other European countries. That much is obvious with even a brief moment's thought. And it's not offline in every EU country, either.

    I was under the impression that the requirements of Britain's new law
    are similar in other parts of the EU. However I don't really know all
    that much about the law and was merely passing on suggestions found
    elsewhere on the internet.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Sun Sep 14 03:39:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 13/09/2025 15:58, John wrote:

    May I suggest if you still want to access Bible Gateway you use Opera.
    It has a built in vpn that you just click on to bypass any website that
    has restricted access due to the online safety act.

    Thanks.
    Alternatively use the one I use, https://biblehub.com/-a I find it miles better than Bible Gateway.

    Actually I have already downloaded the Bibles I most use - and there's
    always e-Sword - so I'm not unduly bothered.

    It's down to individual sites whether they want to restrict access or
    not, although if they don't and Ofcom disagrees, then they're liable to hefty fines.-a Anything blatantly in danger of being potentially harmful
    to children, such as porn sites or suicide sites etc, will be restricted
    by the site owners if they have half a brain, but I wouldn't have
    thought sites such as Bible Gateway would have anything to worry about.

    No, but there must be some reason for the shut-down.
    Incidentally the Online Safety Act is a Conservative Act, which they
    didn't implement whilst in power.
    I'm not sure whether that shows that the Conservatives have a bit more
    sense than Labour.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Sun Sep 14 03:46:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 13/09/2025 15:58, John wrote:

    Alternatively use the one I use, https://biblehub.com/-a I find it miles better than Bible Gateway.

    I've just visited it and it doesn't appear to have the many different languages that BibleGateway had, nor even as many English versions. As
    for navigation, my impression is that the site is a counter-intuitive mess.

    Can you find the Welsh Bible?

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Sun Sep 14 12:09:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 14/09/2025 03:46, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 13/09/2025 15:58, John wrote:

    Alternatively use the one I use, https://biblehub.com/-a I find it
    miles better than Bible Gateway.

    I've just visited it and it doesn't appear to have the many different languages that BibleGateway had, nor even as many English versions. As
    for navigation, my impression is that the site is a counter-intuitive mess.

    Given that I only speak English that isn't an issue for me. It does
    have the Hebrew and Greek for the respective testaments and also
    Strongs, so I find that sufficient.

    I thought the English versions it covers to be quite comprehensive and includes the popular ones. Is there any particular English version you
    think it's lacking that would make a significant difference to
    interpretation?


    Can you find the Welsh Bible?

    No, but it sounds like William Morgan went to great lengths to translate
    from the Hebrew and Greek sources, rather than relying on existing translations.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From GB@NotSomeone@Microsoft.Invalid to uk.religion.christian on Sun Sep 14 15:33:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 13/09/2025 21:59, Mark Goodge wrote:
    On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 20:12:15 +0100, "Kendall K. Down" <kendallkdown@googlemail.com> wrote:

    I don't know whether any of you use BibleGateway.com? I do from
    time-to-time. Apparently it is off-line in Britain and Europe for
    "technical reasons", which https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibleGateway
    says that they are trying to resolve. However they obviously do not
    expect a speedy resolution because they are refunding anyone with paid
    subscription and have warned that any saved material - bookmarks or
    personal study notes - will be deleted.

    The good news is that the site can still be accessed via a VPN.

    Some have suggested that it is due to censorship from Ofcom or because
    of the new online protection legislation - you have to sign in because
    you might be subject to "hate speech" (ie. the Bible) on the website. I
    don't know whether that is so or not, but nothing would surprise me in
    Starmer's Britain.

    It can't be due to UK legislation if it's also offline in other European countries. That much is obvious with even a brief moment's thought. And it's not offline in every EU country, either.

    Mark


    They are being strangely reticent about what the problem is. The fact
    they are repaying subscriptions implies rather strongly that they don't
    expect to restore service in the foreseeable future.

    Also (from the FAQs):

    Will saved content (e.g., notes, progress) be accessible?
    No, all account data and saved content will no longer be accessible. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.


    I wonder whether they have a problem with GDPR?



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Sun Sep 14 16:00:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 14/09/2025 12:09, John wrote:

    I thought the English versions it covers to be quite comprehensive and includes the popular ones. Is there any particular English version you
    think it's lacking that would make a significant difference to interpretation?

    No, and in fact it has the NIV, which BibleGateway lacked. Nevertheless
    the total number of versions was fewer. (Also I didn't check whether the
    NIV is the original, which I use, or the modern "gender inclusive" one,
    which I detest.
    No, but it sounds like William Morgan went to great lengths to translate from the Hebrew and Greek sources, rather than relying on existing translations.
    He did. However his language is rather old-fashioned these days.
    BibleGateway included both the William Morgan and the BCN (Beibl Cymraeg Newydd) which is a sort of Welsh NIV. There is also - though not on BibleGateway - something called Beibl.net which is aimed at young people
    and is so colloquial and down-market that it sets my teeth on edge.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Sun Sep 14 16:02:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 14/09/2025 15:33, GB wrote:

    I wonder whether they have a problem with GDPR?
    GDPR?

    As you say, the indications are that the site is down long-term.

    A shame, as it also had the Hebrew OT and the LXX.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Goodge@usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk to uk.religion.christian on Sun Sep 14 17:07:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 03:36:32 +0100, "Kendall K. Down" <kendallkdown@googlemail.com> wrote:

    On 13/09/2025 21:59, Mark Goodge wrote:

    It can't be due to UK legislation if it's also offline in other European
    countries. That much is obvious with even a brief moment's thought. And it's >> not offline in every EU country, either.

    I was under the impression that the requirements of Britain's new law
    are similar in other parts of the EU. However I don't really know all
    that much about the law and was merely passing on suggestions found >elsewhere on the internet.

    No; the Online Safety Act (which is what some have suggested this is related to, particularly the notion that the Bible is being treated as hate speech)
    has no EU equivalent.

    What it could be is a GDPR data protection related issue. This is common to
    the UK and EU, and also to some other countries with similar legislation. That's particularly plausible given that, under GDPR, data related to a person's religion is treated as sensitive personal data and cannot normally
    be transferred to a non-compliant legal jurisdiction. And there are very
    good reasons for that; it allows, for example, converts to Christianity in
    the UK and EU with foregn nationality (eg, Chinese students and Middle
    Eastern refugees) to truthfully state their religion where necessary on UK online services, or access online religious services, without that data
    being exported to their homeland where it might be used for nefarious
    purposes.

    But the problem is that the US is a non-compliant country. And BibleGateway
    is run by a US company. And, given that Biblegateway serves the Christian market, any individual account set up with Bblegateway will, almost by definition, contain sensitive personal data that cannot legally be exported
    to the US.

    So I suspect that what BibleGateway has found it necessary to do (possibly
    as a result of a regulatory authority somewhere receiving a complaint) is
    set up a separate GDPR compliant operation to serve the UK and EU, which doesn't share personal data with the US parent entity. That's how, for
    example, Google and Amazon do it.

    That's not an insoluble problem, but it will, of course, take a little time
    to set up.

    It would also explain why they're refunding people with paid-for accounts,
    and telling them that they won't be able to retrieve data stored with them, because they've probably had to delete all of that data from their US
    servers.

    Mark



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graham Nye@nospam@thenyes.org.uk to uk.religion.christian on Mon Sep 15 00:40:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 2025-09-14 16:00, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    John wrote:

    [re: https://biblehub.com/ ]

    ... and in fact it has the NIV, which BibleGateway lacked.

    Bible Gateway had the NIV in both US and UK versions. I
    previously provided links to the latter in emailed orders
    of service for my church. Here's a sample link from
    7th Sept, the last Sunday the service worked in the UK:

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2014%3A25-33&version=NIVUK

    Also I didn't check whether the NIV is the original,
    which I use, or the modern "gender inclusive" one,
    which I detest.
    I don't recall which version Bible Gateway had and now
    can't, of course, check.
    --
    Graham Nye
    news(a)thenyes.org.uk



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Mon Sep 15 08:41:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 14/09/2025 16:02, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 14/09/2025 15:33, GB wrote:

    I wonder whether they have a problem with GDPR?
    GDPR?

    https://www.gov.uk/data-protection

    As you say, the indications are that the site is down long-term.

    A shame, as it also had the Hebrew OT and the LXX.

    As I mentioned yesterday, these are on biblehub.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Mon Sep 15 15:16:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 15/09/2025 00:40, Graham Nye wrote:

    Bible Gateway had the NIV in both US and UK versions. I
    previously provided links to the latter in emailed orders
    of service for my church.

    Thanks. I wonder how I came to miss it?

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Mon Sep 15 15:18:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 14/09/2025 17:07, Mark Goodge wrote:

    What it could be is a GDPR data protection related issue. This is common to the UK and EU, and also to some other countries with similar legislation.

    Thanks, Mark. That sounds plausible.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Sat Sep 27 11:15:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 12/09/2025 20:12, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    I don't know whether any of you use BibleGateway.com? I do from time-to- time. Apparently it is off-line in Britain and Europe for "technical reasons", which https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibleGateway says that
    they are trying to resolve. However they obviously do not expect a
    speedy resolution because they are refunding anyone with paid
    subscription and have warned that any saved material - bookmarks or
    personal study notes - will be deleted.

    It appears to be up and running again now. I was checking out a bible
    verse this morning and it took me there.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Mon Sep 29 17:58:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 27/09/2025 11:15, John wrote:

    It appears to be up and running again now. I was checking out a bible
    verse this morning and it took me there.
    Yes, my son showed me over the weekend. However according to him it is
    simply a Bible site; none of the commentaries and study plans which - in
    his view - made the site so valuable are now available.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Oct 1 20:25:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 27/09/2025 11:15, John wrote:

    It appears to be up and running again now. I was checking out a bible
    verse this morning and it took me there.
    When we first mentioned BibleGateway I commented that the New English
    Bible was not featured on the site and someone contradicted me. Now that
    it is back up and running I have checked and the NEB is not on the site.
    There is something called New English Translation, which is not the same
    thing but which may have caused the confusion.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Oct 1 21:47:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 01/10/2025 20:25, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 27/09/2025 11:15, John wrote:

    It appears to be up and running again now. I was checking out a bible
    verse this morning and it took me there.
    When we first mentioned BibleGateway I commented that the New English
    Bible was not featured on the site and someone contradicted me. Now that
    it is back up and running I have checked and the NEB is not on the site. There is something called New English Translation, which is not the same thing but which may have caused the confusion.

    You stated that it lacked the NIV, and your claim was refuted.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Oct 2 03:34:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 01/10/2025 21:47, John wrote:

    You stated that it lacked the NIV, and your claim was refuted.
    If that's what I said, yes, I was wrong.

    Incidentally, does anyone have a URL for an on-line NEB?

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Oct 2 10:32:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 02/10/2025 03:34, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 01/10/2025 21:47, John wrote:

    You stated that it lacked the NIV, and your claim was refuted.
    If that's what I said, yes, I was wrong.

    Incidentally, does anyone have a URL for an on-line NEB?

    It's out of print now apparently and superceded by other translations
    (NIV etc), however I did a quick search and came up with this if it's
    any help

    https://www.katapi.org.uk/NEB/NEB.html



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Oct 2 15:53:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 02/10/2025 10:32, John wrote:

    It's out of print now apparently and superceded by other translations
    (NIV etc), however I did a quick search and came up with this if it's
    any help

    Thanks. I did a quick search - several quick searches - and couldn't
    find it at all, so well done and thank you.
    https://www.katapi.org.uk/NEB/NEB.html

    I was just too lazy to get up and go downstairs to look it up in my
    paper version. Job 14:21, 22 seem slightly contradictory. v. 21 says
    that the dead person is not aware of events on earth, v. 22 appears to
    say that he is aware of what is happening to his own body. All other translations are similar.

    The NEB, on the other hand, comes up with an interesting translation
    that fully accords with soul-sleep.

    His flesh upon him becomes black,
    and his life-blood dries up within him.

    For some reason the translators transposed the verses, so that 22 comes
    before 21. They are a bit overboard with mucking the text about, one
    reason why the translation has died the death (and deservedly).

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Fri Oct 3 12:00:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 02/10/2025 15:53, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 02/10/2025 10:32, John wrote:

    It's out of print now apparently and superceded by other translations
    (NIV etc), however I did a quick search and came up with this if it's
    any help

    Thanks. I did a quick search - several quick searches - and couldn't
    find it at all, so well done and thank you.

    Serves you right for using Bing ;-)

    After I posted i remembered (I think) that my first bible as a Christian
    was the NEB, which I bought in 1985.


    https://www.katapi.org.uk/NEB/NEB.html

    I was just too lazy to get up and go downstairs to look it up in my
    paper version. Job 14:21, 22 seem slightly contradictory. v. 21 says
    that the dead person is not aware of events on earth, v. 22 appears to
    say that he is aware of what is happening to his own body. All other translations are similar.

    The NEB, on the other hand, comes up with an interesting translation
    that fully accords with soul-sleep.

    His flesh upon him becomes black,
    and his life-blood dries up within him.

    For some reason the translators transposed the verses, so that 22 comes before 21. They are a bit overboard with mucking the text about, one
    reason why the translation has died the death (and deservedly).

    Maybe they did it that way because it did make more sense? A few months
    ago you directed me to that verse and I thought, it doesn't make sense







    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Sat Oct 4 04:05:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 03/10/2025 12:00, John wrote:

    Serves you right for using Bing ;-)

    He he.
    After I posted i remembered (I think) that my first bible as a Christian
    was the NEB, which I bought in 1985.

    When it first came out it was the ants pants and bees knees, but as the
    extent of its mucking about became apparent, people started to fall out
    of love with it.

    Maybe they did it that way because it did make more sense?-a A few months ago you directed me to that verse and I thought, it doesn't make sense

    Yes, I presume that was their reason - but without textual evidence to
    justify the transposition it is not a valid scholarly action.

    After all, what they are claiming is that fairly early on, one of these dreaded redactors, looked at the passage said, "You know what? I'll swap
    these two verses around and confuse everybody."

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2