Budget details leaked (ulm)(cont)
From
Spike@aero.spike@mail.com to
uk.net.news.moderation on Thu Dec 4 10:29:32 2025
From Newsgroup: uk.net.news.moderation
Spike wrote:
Since following the success of the Leave campaign, a deal had then to be
made between the parties
involved, which simply *could not be* a rCObetrayal
of democracyrCO on the simple grounds that that was the next part of the
Leave process and was rightly undertaken by the faction with the most
votes. Leave had won the vote, and the negotiations followed. None of that
is rCOegregiousrCO or a rCObetrayal of democracyrCO. ItrCOs how the system works.
Ribbens wrote:
Not a single thing you have said there is in any way true.
Spike wrote:
When in doubt, get HitchenrCOs Razor out.
Ribbens wrote:
I'm going to leave it there I think, since watching you repeatedly rewrite
what I said to mean different things and then demandingI justify these
random inventions of yours grows old very quickly,
and life is far too short to correct every single invention and fundamental misunderstanding you come up with - especially when you seem to have an
endless supply of them.
Spike wrote:
Are you talking to yourself in a mirror?
It has been noted before on the group that a Ribbens Point is a variable
feast, which is something you might care to reflect on.
--
Spike
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2