"The Todal" <the_todal@icloud.com> wrote in message news:mn7398F8uttU1@mid.individual.net...
much snippage
But she was above the age of criminal responsibility in America, and she would surely
have been prosecuted for similar crimes that Ghislaine Maxwell committed, were it not
for the fact that the prosecutors of Epstein and Maxwell needed her evidence so chose
not to prosecute her.
While also choosing not to call her as a witness
quote:
Virginia Giuffre's posthumous book has revealed her grief at not being allowed to
testify against Ghislaine Maxwell because her narrative was seen as too complicated
for the jury: "I'd named so many names."
:unquote
https://www.newsweek.com/virginia-giuffre-ghislaine-maxwell-case-names-epstein-nobodys-girl-10910964
"Her grief".
When then real reason she wasn't called, so its believed, is simply because her
testimony might well have been torn apart in the witness box; and thus
helped undermine the whole case.
Whereas the actual reason Andrew and others decided it best not to give her "her day in Court" was probably because they feared she might take advantage of legal privilege to make further allegations from the witness box; to
be duly reported on that evenings TV news and in the next days papers.
Many of which would be impossible to thoroughly discredit at short notice
to the satisfaction of that self same media; if at all.
While by way of contrast, following the settlement with Law Professor Alan Dershowitz....
quote:
The accuser, Virginia Giuffre, said in a statement that she was young at the time she was trafficked by Epstein and in a "very stressful and traumatic environment." Giuffre had alleged that Epstein had trafficked her to Dershowitz between 2000 and 2002, but Dershowitz long denied her claim.
"I now recognize I may have made a mistake in identifying Mr. Dershowitz," her statement said.
:unquote
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/08/us/alan-dershowitz-virginia-giuffre-allegations-dropped
"I now recognise I may have made a mistake".
Does that admission feature in her book I wonder ? Or is there any mention of Alan Dershowitz at all ?
bb
I note that your reply was to Todall so you possibly just said
something he didn't like.
On 08/11/2025 16:09, Martin Harran wrote:
I note that your reply was to Todall so you possibly just said
something he didn't like.
I didn't reject Billy's post and I would guess that the rejection was a >mistake. Before reading this thread I accepted an identical post from Billy.
On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 11:12:30 +0000, The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com>
wrote:
On 08/11/2025 16:09, Martin Harran wrote:
I note that your reply was to Todall so you possibly just said
something he didn't like.
I didn't reject Billy's post and I would guess that the rejection was a
mistake. Before reading this thread I accepted an identical post from Billy.
Fair eniough - after all, he didn't highlight bullshit made up by you.
On 09/11/2025 11:43, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 11:12:30 +0000, The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com>
wrote:
On 08/11/2025 16:09, Martin Harran wrote:
I note that your reply was to Todall so you possibly just said
something he didn't like.
I didn't reject Billy's post and I would guess that the rejection was a
mistake. Before reading this thread I accepted an identical post from Billy.
Fair eniough - after all, he didn't highlight bullshit made up by you.
I will pray for you.
On 09/11/2025 11:43, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 11:12:30 +0000, The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com>
wrote:
On 08/11/2025 16:09, Martin Harran wrote:Fair eniough - after all, he didn't highlight bullshit made up by you.
I note that your reply was to Todall so you possibly just said >>>>something he didn't like.
I didn't reject Billy's post and I would guess that the rejection was a >>>mistake. Before reading this thread I accepted an identical post from >>>Billy.
I will pray for you.
On 08/11/2025 16:09, Martin Harran wrote:
I note that your reply was to Todall so you possibly just said
something he didn't like.
I didn't reject Billy's post and I would guess that the rejection was a mistake. Before
reading this thread I accepted an identical post from Billy.
I note that your reply was to Todall so you possibly just said
something he didn't like.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 12:22:31 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (2,024K bytes) |
| Messages: | 183,175 |
| Posted today: | 1 |