I think it is possible that posts are not currently reaching the group, whether or not they were from whitelisted posters.
I think it is possible that posts are not currently reaching the group, whether or not they were from whitelisted posters.
On 27/12/2025 10:19 pm, The Todal wrote:
I think it is possible that posts are not currently reaching the
group, whether or not they were from whitelisted posters.
Mine seem to have come through, sometimes within a very few minutes.
On 22:20 27 Dec 2025, JNugent said:
On 27/12/2025 10:19 pm, The Todal wrote:
I think it is possible that posts are not currently reaching the
group, whether or not they were from whitelisted posters.
Mine seem to have come through, sometimes within a very few minutes.
One of my posts approved yesterday (27th Dec at 21:3X hours) has not come through.
Msg-ID: XnsB3C2D9516DE9D1F3QA2@157.180.91.226
It looks like the last post that actually made it through to the group
was JNugent's of yesterday at 19:03, which was approved at 20:2x.
Fourteen posts have been approved since then and none of them have
arrived at the group.
Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:
It looks like the last post that actually made it through to the group
was JNugent's of yesterday at 19:03, which was approved at 20:2x.
Fourteen posts have been approved since then and none of them have
arrived at the group.
<smiley>
Whoever would have thought that JNugent would have played the last post on the group?
</smiley>
On 28/12/2025 22:25, Spike wrote:
Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:Someone should find a bugle and play the Last Post.
It looks like the last post that actually made it through to the group
was JNugent's of yesterday at 19:03, which was approved at 20:2x.
Fourteen posts have been approved since then and none of them have
arrived at the group.
<smiley>
Whoever would have thought that JNugent would have played the last
post on the group?
</smiley>
On 28/12/2025 11:49 pm, The Todal wrote:
On 28/12/2025 22:25, Spike wrote:
Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:Someone should find a bugle and play the Last Post.
It looks like the last post that actually made it through to the group >>>> was JNugent's of yesterday at 19:03, which was approved at 20:2x.
Fourteen posts have been approved since then and none of them have
arrived at the group.
<smiley>
Whoever would have thought that JNugent would have played the last
post on the group?
</smiley>
Oddly, that was also my last post to uk.l.m (as at the present moment).
On 29/12/2025 10:51, JNugent wrote:
On 28/12/2025 11:49 pm, The Todal wrote:
On 28/12/2025 22:25, Spike wrote:
Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:Someone should find a bugle and play the Last Post.
It looks like the last post that actually made it through to the group >>>>> was JNugent's of yesterday at 19:03, which was approved at 20:2x.
Fourteen posts have been approved since then and none of them have
arrived at the group.
<smiley>
Whoever would have thought that JNugent would have played the last
post on the group?
</smiley>
Oddly, that was also my last post to uk.l.m (as at the present moment).
Posts still reach the moderation queue but after being accepted by the
mods those posts still don't reach ULM.-a Currently the queue is empty.
On 29/12/2025 10:51, JNugent wrote:
On 28/12/2025 11:49 pm, The Todal wrote:
On 28/12/2025 22:25, Spike wrote:
Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:Someone should find a bugle and play the Last Post.
It looks like the last post that actually made it through to the
group was JNugent's of yesterday at 19:03, which was approved at
20:2x.
Fourteen posts have been approved since then and none of them
have arrived at the group.
<smiley>
Whoever would have thought that JNugent would have played the last
post on the group?
</smiley>
Oddly, that was also my last post to uk.l.m (as at the present
moment).
Posts still reach the moderation queue but after being accepted by
the mods those posts still don't reach ULM. Currently the queue is
empty.
Posts still reach the moderation queue but after being accepted by the
mods those posts still don't reach ULM. Currently the queue is empty.
The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> writes:
Posts still reach the moderation queue but after being accepted by the
mods those posts still don't reach ULM. Currently the queue is empty.
I think those posts have now propagated correctly. Chiark had an issue
over the weekend, which (inter alia) left the news server in a slightly
odd state; and I've been away myself.
Matthew
The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> writes:
Posts still reach the moderation queue but after being accepted by the
mods those posts still don't reach ULM. Currently the queue is empty.
I think those posts have now propagated correctly. Chiark had an issue
over the weekend, which (inter alia) left the news server in a slightly
odd state; and I've been away myself.
Matthew
The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> writes:
Posts still reach the moderation queue but after being accepted by the
mods those posts still don't reach ULM. Currently the queue is empty.
I think those posts have now propagated correctly. Chiark had an issue
over the weekend, which (inter alia) left the news server in a slightly
odd state; and I've been away myself.
On 2025-12-29, Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> wrote:
The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> writes:
Posts still reach the moderation queue but after being accepted by the
mods those posts still don't reach ULM. Currently the queue is empty.
I think those posts have now propagated correctly. Chiark had an issue
over the weekend, which (inter alia) left the news server in a slightly
odd state; and I've been away myself.
Could you perhaps take a look at the web server as well, or chiark in general? It's been very unreliable for weeks now. (e.g. frequently
getting "connection timed out" on https requests.)
Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes:
On 2025-12-29, Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> wrote:
The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> writes:
Posts still reach the moderation queue but after being accepted by the >>>> mods those posts still don't reach ULM. Currently the queue is empty.
I think those posts have now propagated correctly. Chiark had an issue
over the weekend, which (inter alia) left the news server in a slightly
odd state; and I've been away myself.
Could you perhaps take a look at the web server as well, or chiark in
general? It's been very unreliable for weeks now. (e.g. frequently
getting "connection timed out" on https requests.)
I think like many web-servers, it sometimes gets abusively scraped; but
I've not encountered problems with its web interfaces for a while now...
On 2025-12-30, Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> wrote:
Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes:
Could you perhaps take a look at the web server as well, or chiark in
general? It's been very unreliable for weeks now. (e.g. frequently
getting "connection timed out" on https requests.)
I think like many web-servers, it sometimes gets abusively scraped; but
I've not encountered problems with its web interfaces for a while now...
Nevertheless, it is having problems and has been for some weeks. It must
be affecting all the web services it provides because of course at the 'connection timed out' stage the browser won't yet have identified what
site it's trying to access.
On 30/12/2025 14:11, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On 2025-12-30, Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> wrote:
Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes:
Could you perhaps take a look at the web server as well, or chiark in
general? It's been very unreliable for weeks now. (e.g. frequently
getting "connection timed out" on https requests.)
I think like many web-servers, it sometimes gets abusively scraped; but
I've not encountered problems with its web interfaces for a while now...
Nevertheless, it is having problems and has been for some weeks. It must
be affecting all the web services it provides because of course at the
'connection timed out' stage the browser won't yet have identified what
site it's trying to access.
Before saying anything else, may I take this opportunity to thank you, Matthew, for the work you do behind the scenes to keep things running
for us all.
I can confirm that I could not access the moderation queue for large
periods of Monday evening this week.
As per Jon's description, be connection was timing out.
However, since then, things seem to have been better and I haven't experienced any timeouts when attempting to access / process the
moderation queue
Before saying anything else, may I take this opportunity to thank you, >Matthew, for the work you do behind the scenes to keep things running
for us all.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 14:18:32 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
3 files (2,681K bytes) |
| Messages: | 183,842 |
| Posted today: | 1 |