Some interesting PUblic Service messaging last night:
1. PPE is great for flu - WEAR A MASK !
2. All Pakistanis are lovely people [1] and will go home of their own
accord eventually, but especially if they're made to feel unwelcome on farms.
[1] True in my personal experience
On 10.12.25 13:31, BrritSki wrote:
Some interesting PUblic Service messaging last night:
1. PPE is great for flu - WEAR A MASK !
2. All Pakistanis are lovely people [1] and will go home of their own
accord eventually, but especially if they're made to feel unwelcome on
farms.
[1] True in my personal experience
Where did Leonard obtain the PPE at short notice?-a If it is viral it is
my view that PPE actually prevents very little.
Lily on Saturday given that exposure seems to take two days to develop
(Paul having been OK on Monday unlike the other two?).
On 10/12/2025 15:01, Kosmo wrote:True as far as it goes but the Cochrane review [1] found very little
On 10.12.25 13:31, BrritSki wrote:
Some interesting PUblic Service messaging last night:
1. PPE is great for flu - WEAR A MASK !
2. All Pakistanis are lovely people [1] and will go home of their own
accord eventually, but especially if they're made to feel unwelcome
on farms.
[1] True in my personal experience
Where did Leonard obtain the PPE at short notice?-a If it is viral it
is my view that PPE actually prevents very little.
This is not true, but it is the case that where respiratory illnesses
are concerned PPE (especially masks) are better worn by an infected
person to prevent transmission to a non-infected person.
On 10/12/2025 16:20, john ashby wrote:
On 10/12/2025 15:01, Kosmo wrote:True as far as it goes but the Cochrane review [1] found very little
On 10.12.25 13:31, BrritSki wrote:
Some interesting PUblic Service messaging last night:
1. PPE is great for flu - WEAR A MASK !
2. All Pakistanis are lovely people [1] and will go home of their
own accord eventually, but especially if they're made to feel
unwelcome on farms.
[1] True in my personal experience
Where did Leonard obtain the PPE at short notice?-a If it is viral it
is my view that PPE actually prevents very little.
This is not true, but it is the case that where respiratory illnesses
are concerned PPE (especially masks) are better worn by an infected
person to prevent transmission to a non-infected person.
good evidence to support this.
Even with the best quality masks they have to be fitted properly with no gaps and the (wo)man on the Clapham Omnibus is unlikely to have the best quality and/or fit the mask correctly.
And anyway, if you really had flu you wouldn't be up and about spreading
it.
[1] that was disgracefully treated because it didn't fit the Covid
narrative at the time.
On 12/12/2025 10:13, BrritSki wrote:
On 10/12/2025 16:20, john ashby wrote:
On 10/12/2025 15:01, Kosmo wrote:True as far as it goes but the Cochrane review [1] found very little
On 10.12.25 13:31, BrritSki wrote:
Some interesting PUblic Service messaging last night:
1. PPE is great for flu - WEAR A MASK !
2. All Pakistanis are lovely people [1] and will go home of their
own accord eventually, but especially if they're made to feel
unwelcome on farms.
[1] True in my personal experience
Where did Leonard obtain the PPE at short notice?-a If it is viral it >>>> is my view that PPE actually prevents very little.
This is not true, but it is the case that where respiratory illnesses
are concerned PPE (especially masks) are better worn by an infected
person to prevent transmission to a non-infected person.
good evidence to support this.
Even with the best quality masks they have to be fitted properly with
no gaps and the (wo)man on the Clapham Omnibus is unlikely to have the
best quality and/or fit the mask correctly.
And anyway, if you really had flu you wouldn't be up and about
spreading it.
[1] that was disgracefully treated because it didn't fit the Covid
narrative at the time.
As POI mentioned this week it is so lovely to see that masks are still
being worn below the nose this year.
On 10/12/2025 16:20, john ashby wrote:
On 10/12/2025 15:01, Kosmo wrote:True as far as it goes but the Cochrane review [1] found very little
On 10.12.25 13:31, BrritSki wrote:
Some interesting PUblic Service messaging last night:
1. PPE is great for flu - WEAR A MASK !
2. All Pakistanis are lovely people [1] and will go home of their
own accord eventually, but especially if they're made to feel
unwelcome on farms.
[1] True in my personal experience
Where did Leonard obtain the PPE at short notice?-a If it is viral it
is my view that PPE actually prevents very little.
This is not true, but it is the case that where respiratory illnesses
are concerned PPE (especially masks) are better worn by an infected
person to prevent transmission to a non-infected person.
good evidence to support this.
Even with the best quality masks they have to be fitted properly with no gaps and the (wo)man on the Clapham Omnibus is unlikely to have the best quality and/or fit the mask correctly.
And anyway, if you really had flu you wouldn't be up and about spreading
it.
[1] that was disgracefully treated because it didn't fit the Covid--
narrative at the time.
On 10/12/2025 15:01, Kosmo wrote:
On 10.12.25 13:31, BrritSki wrote:
Some interesting PUblic Service messaging last night:
1. PPE is great for flu - WEAR A MASK !
2. All Pakistanis are lovely people [1] and will go home of their own
accord eventually, but especially if they're made to feel unwelcome on
farms.
[1] True in my personal experience
Where did Leonard obtain the PPE at short notice?-a If it is viral it is
my view that PPE actually prevents very little.
This is not true, but it is the case that where respiratory illnesses
are concerned PPE (especially masks) are better worn by an infected
person to prevent transmission to a non-infected person. With a gastric illness then either frequent change of gloves or frequent and thorough handwashing are probably the most effective.
Where were Josh and
Lily on Saturday given that exposure seems to take two days to develop
(Paul having been OK on Monday unlike the other two?).
Paul was talking about some pet he was dealing with before the weekend
and I missed the detail but wondered if that could be the origin (I
thought I heard Paul say an "Oh" as if he also thought of that).
john
john ashby <johnashby20@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 10/12/2025 15:01, Kosmo wrote:
On 10.12.25 13:31, BrritSki wrote:
Some interesting PUblic Service messaging last night:
1. PPE is great for flu - WEAR A MASK !
2. All Pakistanis are lovely people [1] and will go home of their own
accord eventually, but especially if they're made to feel unwelcome on >>>> farms.
[1] True in my personal experience
Where did Leonard obtain the PPE at short notice?-a If it is viral it is >>> my view that PPE actually prevents very little.
This is not true, but it is the case that where respiratory illnesses
are concerned PPE (especially masks) are better worn by an infected
person to prevent transmission to a non-infected person. With a gastric
illness then either frequent change of gloves or frequent and thorough
handwashing are probably the most effective.
Where were Josh and
Lily on Saturday given that exposure seems to take two days to develop
(Paul having been OK on Monday unlike the other two?).
Paul was talking about some pet he was dealing with before the weekend
and I missed the detail but wondered if that could be the origin (I
thought I heard Paul say an "Oh" as if he also thought of that).
john
Might be - though PaulrCOs now caught it. It might be the virulent flu theyrCOre got mind you.
Kosmo <krw@whitnet.uk> wrote:
On 10.12.25 13:31, BrritSki wrote:
Some interesting PUblic Service messaging last night:
1. PPE is great for flu - WEAR A MASK !
2. All Pakistanis are lovely people [1] and will go home of their own
accord eventually, but especially if they're made to feel unwelcome on
farms.
[1] True in my personal experience
Where did Leonard obtain the PPE at short notice? If it is viral it is
my view that PPE actually prevents very little. Where were Josh and
Lily on Saturday given that exposure seems to take two days to develop
(Paul having been OK on Monday unlike the other two?).
And who is going to make sure the house is fit for inspection
(regrettably a silent visit from Shula on Saturday). And if both Josh
and Lily are b******** off elsewhere can Josh afford to be the sole
tenant? Indeed why are they not already looking for a replacement for
Lily? There are less holes in the good lady wife's colander.
Paul as sole tenant? So if Lily legs it to Australia (does she know of aunty ShularCOs ill fated trip as a student aged farmerrCOs daughter?), it suggests er best friend has better fish to fry? I think the Maliks will
stay Akram will help run Meadow Farm with Khalid and George if he doesnrCOt nugger off after the bust up with his short lived love of his life.
Mrs McT
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:46:23 |
| Calls: | 743 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| Messages: | 187,735 |