• Re: Prisoner number 3764552: formerly The Andrew previously known as Prince

    From billy bookcase@billy@anon.com to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Feb 20 17:53:59 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated


    "Max Demian" <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:10n9p63$df7b$1@dont-email.me...
    On 19/02/2026 20:50, billy bookcase wrote:
    "Max Demian" <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
    news:10n7hr3$3mule$1@dont-email.me...

    The King said, "the law must take its course." I think I detect a certain >>> amount of sibling rivalry, due to Andrew being their mother's favourite.

    But then what would one have his Majesty say instead ?

    Its a fit up ! The boy's innocent OK ? You slags !

    He could have defended his flesh and blood. After all, all it's *really* about
    is Andrews sexual naughtiness, and the King hasn't an unblemished reputation in this regard - remember tampon-gate?

    Er no. Perhaps totally unexpectedly the "investigation" has now
    branched into at least three separate strands.

    And all because the Democrats, quite wrongly as it seems to have turned
    out thought they could dish up some real dirt, on Donald Trump.

    Of whom it was known, right from the outset, employed 17 year old girls
    as "locker room attendants" in his Mar E Largo Club.

    You have people like Chomsky who while not expecting any sexual or
    financial favours nevertheless thought it a good idea to associate
    with Epstein

    When the Wayback machine throws up Wiki pages from 2008, detailing
    all the under-age accusations being levelled against Epstein.

    Then you have people like Mandelson who while clearly not interested in
    sexual favours, thought it might be to their social and financial
    advantage to maintain links with Epstein. As did many others

    Then you have Andy and Fergy both skint; and both thick as short planks;
    who were east prey for a wily social climber like Epstein

    As a prince of the blood royal, Andrew still had his pick of all the well
    bred nymphos in London, if not the UK. All up for it at the drop of
    a hat. . The idea that he could be seduced by the prospect of some
    scrawny looking 17 yr old being specially flown in from the US is
    quite frankly the biggest load of old cobblers, ever. And no he
    didn't remember her; just as he didn't remember any of other hundreds
    of "ordinary people" queuing up to have their picture taken
    with him, every year

    Still its nice to see that Andrew hasn't denied himself the chance
    of yet another "golden" photo-opportunity

    It's almost as if Epstein is directing him from beyond the grave

    "That's it Andy; lie back and look as though you're being restrained"



    bb





    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Todal@the_todal@icloud.com to uk.legal.moderated on Sun Feb 22 09:31:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 20/02/2026 17:53, billy bookcase wrote:
    "Max Demian" <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:10n9p63$df7b$1@dont-email.me...
    On 19/02/2026 20:50, billy bookcase wrote:
    "Max Demian" <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
    news:10n7hr3$3mule$1@dont-email.me...

    The King said, "the law must take its course." I think I detect a certain >>>> amount of sibling rivalry, due to Andrew being their mother's favourite. >>>
    But then what would one have his Majesty say instead ?

    Its a fit up ! The boy's innocent OK ? You slags !

    He could have defended his flesh and blood. After all, all it's *really* about
    is Andrews sexual naughtiness, and the King hasn't an unblemished reputation >> in this regard - remember tampon-gate?

    Er no. Perhaps totally unexpectedly the "investigation" has now
    branched into at least three separate strands.

    And all because the Democrats, quite wrongly as it seems to have turned
    out thought they could dish up some real dirt, on Donald Trump.

    Of whom it was known, right from the outset, employed 17 year old girls
    as "locker room attendants" in his Mar E Largo Club.

    You have people like Chomsky who while not expecting any sexual or
    financial favours nevertheless thought it a good idea to associate
    with Epstein

    When the Wayback machine throws up Wiki pages from 2008, detailing
    all the under-age accusations being levelled against Epstein.

    Then you have people like Mandelson who while clearly not interested in sexual favours, thought it might be to their social and financial
    advantage to maintain links with Epstein. As did many others

    Then you have Andy and Fergy both skint; and both thick as short planks;
    who were east prey for a wily social climber like Epstein

    As a prince of the blood royal, Andrew still had his pick of all the well bred nymphos in London, if not the UK. All up for it at the drop of
    a hat. . The idea that he could be seduced by the prospect of some
    scrawny looking 17 yr old being specially flown in from the US is
    quite frankly the biggest load of old cobblers, ever. And no he
    didn't remember her; just as he didn't remember any of other hundreds
    of "ordinary people" queuing up to have their picture taken
    with him, every year

    Still its nice to see that Andrew hasn't denied himself the chance
    of yet another "golden" photo-opportunity

    It's almost as if Epstein is directing him from beyond the grave

    "That's it Andy; lie back and look as though you're being restrained"


    In relation to your final point: a lucky photographer managed to sneak a
    flash photograph through tinted windows, and it's obvious that Andrew
    was not posing for the cameras. He was probably startled by all the
    flashes going off. If he'd had any sense, or had been properly advised
    by the officers, he would have covered his face just in case it might
    have been visible to photographers.



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Sun Feb 22 16:04:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-02-22, The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> wrote:
    On 20/02/2026 17:53, billy bookcase wrote:
    Still its nice to see that Andrew hasn't denied himself the chance
    of yet another "golden" photo-opportunity

    It's almost as if Epstein is directing him from beyond the grave

    "That's it Andy; lie back and look as though you're being restrained"

    In relation to your final point: a lucky photographer managed to sneak a flash photograph through tinted windows, and it's obvious that Andrew
    was not posing for the cameras. He was probably startled by all the
    flashes going off. If he'd had any sense, or had been properly advised
    by the officers, he would have covered his face just in case it might
    have been visible to photographers.

    I'm not sure a photo of Andrew with a bag over his head or
    shame-facedly peering between his fingers would have been better.

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2