• UTM, anyone?

    From Another John@lalaw44@hotmail.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Sat Dec 6 17:47:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Has anyone here used UTM?

    I had a sudden yen to play a few of the ancient games I used to play under OS9 and Snow Leopard, so I assumed that on asking Google the question, I'd be proplelled towards Sheepshaver or the like - names I've seen many times in the past, but never dipped my toe.

    This time, Google returned "UTM" as an alternative - up front, it looks incredibly simple to use, with the emphasis on "incredibly". Is anyone here familiar with it?

    Cheers
    Another John
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan B@alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Sat Dec 6 17:58:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 6 Dec 2025 at 17:47:24 GMT, "Another John" <lalaw44@hotmail.com> wrote:

    Has anyone here used UTM?

    I had a sudden yen to play a few of the ancient games I used to play under OS9
    and Snow Leopard, so I assumed that on asking Google the question, I'd be proplelled towards Sheepshaver or the like - names I've seen many times in the
    past, but never dipped my toe.

    This time, Google returned "UTM" as an alternative - up front, it looks incredibly simple to use, with the emphasis on "incredibly". Is anyone here familiar with it?

    I have SheepShaver running Mac OS 9 emulation on my M1 Mac (it will aso run on Intel Mac of course). But SheepShaver can't emulate Mac OS newer than 9.

    I've just recently created an Alpine Linux VM using UTM on my intel Mac and it runs very nicely. You should be able to create OSX VMs using it. Alternatively you could also use the free version of VMware Fusion, Parallels and
    VirtualBox. I've got a Mojave VM running using VMware Fusion on my Intel Mac. --
    Cheers, Alan
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan B@alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Sat Dec 6 18:11:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 6 Dec 2025 at 17:58:45 GMT, "Alan B" <alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid> wrote:

    On 6 Dec 2025 at 17:47:24 GMT, "Another John" <lalaw44@hotmail.com> wrote:

    Has anyone here used UTM?

    I had a sudden yen to play a few of the ancient games I used to play under OS9
    and Snow Leopard, so I assumed that on asking Google the question, I'd be
    proplelled towards Sheepshaver or the like - names I've seen many times in the
    past, but never dipped my toe.

    This time, Google returned "UTM" as an alternative - up front, it looks
    incredibly simple to use, with the emphasis on "incredibly". Is anyone here >> familiar with it?

    I have SheepShaver running Mac OS 9 emulation on my M1 Mac (it will aso run on
    Intel Mac of course). But SheepShaver can't emulate Mac OS newer than 9.

    I've just recently created an Alpine Linux VM using UTM on my intel Mac and it
    runs very nicely. You should be able to create OSX VMs using it. Alternatively
    you could also use the free version of VMware Fusion, Parallels and VirtualBox. I've got a Mojave VM running using VMware Fusion on my Intel Mac.

    You probably know this but Parallels is subscription based but has a 14 day free trial.
    --
    Cheers, Alan
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris@ithinkiam@gmail.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Sat Dec 6 21:02:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Another John <lalaw44@hotmail.com> wrote:
    Has anyone here used UTM?

    I had a sudden yen to play a few of the ancient games I used to play under OS9
    and Snow Leopard, so I assumed that on asking Google the question, I'd be proplelled towards Sheepshaver or the like - names I've seen many times in the
    past, but never dipped my toe.

    This time, Google returned "UTM" as an alternative - up front, it looks incredibly simple to use, with the emphasis on "incredibly". Is anyone here familiar with it?


    I use it quite a lot for linux VMs and it's really fast and very light
    weight. Not used it for any macOS or OS9 emulation

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Theo@theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk to uk.comp.sys.mac on Sun Dec 7 10:26:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Another John <lalaw44@hotmail.com> wrote:
    Has anyone here used UTM?

    I had a sudden yen to play a few of the ancient games I used to play under OS9
    and Snow Leopard, so I assumed that on asking Google the question, I'd be proplelled towards Sheepshaver or the like - names I've seen many times in the
    past, but never dipped my toe.

    This time, Google returned "UTM" as an alternative - up front, it looks incredibly simple to use, with the emphasis on "incredibly". Is anyone here familiar with it?

    It's pretty nice. I made a one-click download link like this:

    utm://downloadVM?url=https://example.com/My-UTM-VM.zip

    People can click the link in their browser, and it downloads the VM image
    and loads it into UTM and starts it. From experience with a few hundred
    users it's a lot smoother than the equivalent setup on Windows using VirtualBox.


    UTM uses QEMU under the hood. QEMU is very powerful but getting it to
    emulate specific hardware (like older PowerPC needed for OS9) can require
    some tweaking of settings. However it seems like that's already been done:

    https://appleinsider.com/inside/macos/tips/how-to-run-mac-os-9-on-apple-silicon-using-utm

    and so you can just use their pre-built OS images.

    For other MacOS versions it looks like somebody has pre-built the configs: https://github.com/adespoton/utmconfigs

    but you have to supply your own MacOS installer and do the install in the VM like you would when installing a new hard drive in the Mac.

    Theo
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan B@alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Sun Dec 7 11:14:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
    Another John <lalaw44@hotmail.com> wrote:
    Has anyone here used UTM?

    I had a sudden yen to play a few of the ancient games I used to play under OS9
    and Snow Leopard, so I assumed that on asking Google the question, I'd be
    proplelled towards Sheepshaver or the like - names I've seen many times in the
    past, but never dipped my toe.

    This time, Google returned "UTM" as an alternative - up front, it looks
    incredibly simple to use, with the emphasis on "incredibly". Is anyone here >> familiar with it?

    It's pretty nice. I made a one-click download link like this:

    utm://downloadVM?url=https://example.com/My-UTM-VM.zip

    People can click the link in their browser, and it downloads the VM image
    and loads it into UTM and starts it. From experience with a few hundred users it's a lot smoother than the equivalent setup on Windows using VirtualBox.


    UTM uses QEMU under the hood. QEMU is very powerful but getting it to emulate specific hardware (like older PowerPC needed for OS9) can require some tweaking of settings. However it seems like that's already been done:

    https://appleinsider.com/inside/macos/tips/how-to-run-mac-os-9-on-apple-silicon-using-utm

    and so you can just use their pre-built OS images.

    For other MacOS versions it looks like somebody has pre-built the configs: https://github.com/adespoton/utmconfigs

    but you have to supply your own MacOS installer and do the install in the VM like you would when installing a new hard drive in the Mac.

    UTM used to have an option to download a prebuilt Mac OS 9 VM on their
    website but it disappeared a while ago. However the AppleInsider article
    you referenced looks interesting especially as my SheepShaver setup crashes frequently.
    --
    Cheers, Alan
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TimH@thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Sun Dec 7 11:28:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 7 Dec 2025 at 11:14:41rC>am GMT, "Alan B" <alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid> wrote:

    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
    Another John <lalaw44@hotmail.com> wrote:
    Has anyone here used UTM?

    I had a sudden yen to play a few of the ancient games I used to play under OS9
    and Snow Leopard, so I assumed that on asking Google the question, I'd be >>> proplelled towards Sheepshaver or the like - names I've seen many times in the
    past, but never dipped my toe.

    This time, Google returned "UTM" as an alternative - up front, it looks
    incredibly simple to use, with the emphasis on "incredibly". Is anyone here >>> familiar with it?

    It's pretty nice. I made a one-click download link like this:

    utm://downloadVM?url=https://example.com/My-UTM-VM.zip

    People can click the link in their browser, and it downloads the VM image
    and loads it into UTM and starts it. From experience with a few hundred
    users it's a lot smoother than the equivalent setup on Windows using
    VirtualBox.


    UTM uses QEMU under the hood. QEMU is very powerful but getting it to
    emulate specific hardware (like older PowerPC needed for OS9) can require
    some tweaking of settings. However it seems like that's already been done: >>
    https://appleinsider.com/inside/macos/tips/how-to-run-mac-os-9-on-apple-silicon-using-utm

    and so you can just use their pre-built OS images.

    For other MacOS versions it looks like somebody has pre-built the configs: >> https://github.com/adespoton/utmconfigs

    but you have to supply your own MacOS installer and do the install in the VM >> like you would when installing a new hard drive in the Mac.

    UTM used to have an option to download a prebuilt Mac OS 9 VM on their website but it disappeared a while ago. However the AppleInsider article
    you referenced looks interesting especially as my SheepShaver setup crashes frequently.

    I've also used the links Theo gave; I have MacOS 9.2 and several shades of OSX all running fine. Must give System 7 a go.
    Obligatory old fart observation: got to say those old versions look increasingly well-designed in the context of recent Mac OS's.
    --
    TimH
    pull tooth to reply by email
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From alanrichardbarker@alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid (Alan B) to uk.comp.sys.mac on Sun Dec 7 15:20:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:

    [snip]

    I've also used the links Theo gave; I have MacOS 9.2 and several shades of OSX
    all running fine. Must give System 7 a go.
    Obligatory old fart observation: got to say those old versions look increasingly well-designed in the context of recent Mac OS's.

    OS 9.22 up and running via UTM :) Ah, the nostalgia ;-)
    --
    Cheers, Alan
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris@ithinkiam@gmail.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Sun Dec 7 15:25:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
    Another John <lalaw44@hotmail.com> wrote:
    Has anyone here used UTM?

    I had a sudden yen to play a few of the ancient games I used to play under OS9
    and Snow Leopard, so I assumed that on asking Google the question, I'd be
    proplelled towards Sheepshaver or the like - names I've seen many times in the
    past, but never dipped my toe.

    This time, Google returned "UTM" as an alternative - up front, it looks
    incredibly simple to use, with the emphasis on "incredibly". Is anyone here >> familiar with it?

    It's pretty nice. I made a one-click download link like this:

    utm://downloadVM?url=https://example.com/My-UTM-VM.zip

    People can click the link in their browser, and it downloads the VM image
    and loads it into UTM and starts it. From experience with a few hundred users it's a lot smoother than the equivalent setup on Windows using VirtualBox.

    That's a useful trick. Does the VM need configuring somehow to make this
    work seamlessly?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan B@alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Dec 8 09:04:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:

    [snip]

    Must give System 7 a go.
    Obligatory old fart observation: got to say those old versions look increasingly well-designed in the context of recent Mac OS's.

    Not sure you can do that with UTM? Basilisk II might be best for 7.
    --
    Cheers, Alan
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TimH@thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Dec 8 09:26:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 8 Dec 2025 at 9:04:10rC>am GMT, "Alan B" <alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid> wrote:

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:

    [snip]

    Must give System 7 a go.
    Obligatory old fart observation: got to say those old versions look
    increasingly well-designed in the context of recent Mac OS's.

    Not sure you can do that with UTM? Basilisk II might be best for 7.

    Ah, thanks. Will investigate.
    --
    TimH
    pull tooth to reply by email
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan B@alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Dec 8 09:34:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 8 Dec 2025 at 9:04:10rC>am GMT, "Alan B" <alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid> wrote:

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:

    [snip]

    Must give System 7 a go.
    Obligatory old fart observation: got to say those old versions look
    increasingly well-designed in the context of recent Mac OS's.

    Not sure you can do that with UTM? Basilisk II might be best for 7.

    Ah, thanks. Will investigate.

    You can always have a play with this:

    <https://infinitemac.org>

    I think it was Jaimie who pointed out that site some years ago.
    --
    Cheers, Alan
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TimH@thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Dec 8 09:52:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 8 Dec 2025 at 9:34:47rC>am GMT, "Alan B" <alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid> wrote:

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 8 Dec 2025 at 9:04:10rC>am GMT, "Alan B"
    <alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid> wrote:

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:

    [snip]

    Must give System 7 a go.
    Obligatory old fart observation: got to say those old versions look
    increasingly well-designed in the context of recent Mac OS's.

    Not sure you can do that with UTM? Basilisk II might be best for 7.

    Ah, thanks. Will investigate.

    You can always have a play with this:

    <https://infinitemac.org>

    I think it was Jaimie who pointed out that site some years ago.

    I'd forgotten about that! Quite an amazing feat. And Oscar the Grouch is there waiting to be installed :)
    --
    TimH
    pull tooth to reply by email
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Theo@theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Dec 8 15:38:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    It's pretty nice. I made a one-click download link like this:

    utm://downloadVM?url=https://example.com/My-UTM-VM.zip

    People can click the link in their browser, and it downloads the VM image and loads it into UTM and starts it. From experience with a few hundred users it's a lot smoother than the equivalent setup on Windows using VirtualBox.

    That's a useful trick. Does the VM need configuring somehow to make this
    work seamlessly?

    No, you just zip up the .utm directory (found in ~/Library/somewhere where
    UTM puts its saved VMs), put it on a website and make up the link.

    A recent example:

    $ zipinfo ECAD-UTM-20240917.zip
    Archive: ECAD-UTM-20240917.zip
    Zip file size: 13190505748 bytes, number of entries: 6
    drwxr-xr-x 3.0 unx 0 bx stor 24-Sep-17 14:30 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/ -rw-r--r-- 3.0 unx 61038 bx defX 24-Sep-17 14:55 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/screenshot.png
    -rw-r--r-- 3.0 unx 2777 tx defX 24-Sep-17 14:17 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/config.plist
    drwxr-xr-x 3.0 unx 0 bx stor 24-Sep-17 14:51 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/Data/
    -rw-r--r-- 3.0 unx 13426884608 bx defX 24-Sep-17 14:55 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/Data/ecad-ubuntu.qcow2
    -rw-r--r-- 3.0 unx 655360 bx defX 24-Sep-17 14:53 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/Data/efi_vars.fd
    6 files, 13427603783 bytes uncompressed, 13190504440 bytes compressed: 1.8%

    Theo
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@hugybear@gmx.net to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Dec 8 17:42:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 06.12.25 18:47, Another John wrote:
    Has anyone here used UTM?

    I had a sudden yen to play a few of the ancient games I used to play under OS9
    and Snow Leopard, so I assumed that on asking Google the question, I'd be proplelled towards Sheepshaver or the like - names I've seen many times in the
    past, but never dipped my toe.

    This time, Google returned "UTM" as an alternative - up front, it looks incredibly simple to use, with the emphasis on "incredibly". Is anyone here familiar with it?

    What is UTM?
    UTM is a security solution that combines multiple security features into
    a single platform or device. It is designed to simplify network security management by integrating various protective functions, such as:

    Firewall: Filters incoming and outgoing network traffic.
    Intrusion Prevention System (IPS): Detects and blocks attacks in real time. Antivirus/Anti-Malware: Protects against malicious software.
    VPN Support: Enables secure remote connections.
    Content Filtering: Blocks access to unwanted or dangerous websites.
    Spam Filtering: Filters out unwanted emails.
    Why Use UTM?

    Centralized Management: All security functions are controlled through a
    single interface.
    Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for multiple standalone security
    devices or solutions.
    Ease of Maintenance: Updates and configurations can be managed centrally.
    UTM solutions are particularly popular among small and medium-sized
    businesses (SMBs) because they provide comprehensive security without
    requiring complex infrastructure. If you have more specific questions
    about UTM or a particular product, let me know!

    Cheers
    Another John

    CU, J||rg
    --
    "De gustibus non est disputandum."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris@ithinkiam@gmail.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Dec 8 18:36:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    It's pretty nice. I made a one-click download link like this:

    utm://downloadVM?url=https://example.com/My-UTM-VM.zip

    People can click the link in their browser, and it downloads the VM image >>> and loads it into UTM and starts it. From experience with a few hundred >>> users it's a lot smoother than the equivalent setup on Windows using
    VirtualBox.

    That's a useful trick. Does the VM need configuring somehow to make this
    work seamlessly?

    No, you just zip up the .utm directory (found in ~/Library/somewhere where UTM puts its saved VMs), put it on a website and make up the link.

    A recent example:

    $ zipinfo ECAD-UTM-20240917.zip
    Archive: ECAD-UTM-20240917.zip
    Zip file size: 13190505748 bytes, number of entries: 6
    drwxr-xr-x 3.0 unx 0 bx stor 24-Sep-17 14:30 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/ -rw-r--r-- 3.0 unx 61038 bx defX 24-Sep-17 14:55 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/screenshot.png
    -rw-r--r-- 3.0 unx 2777 tx defX 24-Sep-17 14:17 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/config.plist
    drwxr-xr-x 3.0 unx 0 bx stor 24-Sep-17 14:51 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/Data/
    -rw-r--r-- 3.0 unx 13426884608 bx defX 24-Sep-17 14:55 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/Data/ecad-ubuntu.qcow2
    -rw-r--r-- 3.0 unx 655360 bx defX 24-Sep-17 14:53 ECAD Ubuntu 2204.utm/Data/efi_vars.fd
    6 files, 13427603783 bytes uncompressed, 13190504440 bytes compressed: 1.8%

    Theo

    Thanks!

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan B@alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Fri Dec 12 09:35:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 2025-12-08, TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 8 Dec 2025 at 9:04:10rC>am GMT, "Alan B"
    <alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid> wrote:

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:

    [snip]

    Must give System 7 a go.
    Obligatory old fart observation: got to say those old versions look
    increasingly well-designed in the context of recent Mac OS's.

    Not sure you can do that with UTM? Basilisk II might be best for 7.

    Ah, thanks. Will investigate.

    I eventually got an OS 7.5.3 emulation running via Basilisk II on my
    M1 Mac. It's just the basic OS currently but worth having a play with
    on those wet, windy winter days when I've nothing better to do!
    --
    Cheers, Alan
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2