https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/federal-testing- improves-detection-h5n1-avian-flu-us-dairy-herds
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/32/2/25-1332_article
The report was published in the same CDC newsletter that published the
study that H5N1 could survive the most common method of pasteurization.
The FDA claimed that they were going to test that observation in order
to insure a safe milk supply, but the testing was never started.-a No processing plants producing virus containing milk products was ever
tested to see if the virus could survive pasteurization.-a The Missouri patient and one of the California children that was infected only had
the pasteurized dairy products that they consumed to link them to the
dairy virus that infected them.-a Both Missouri infections consumed the
same batch of dairy products before becoming ill (they lived in the same household).
For this report the Ohio researchers reanalyzed the FDAs original
testing of milk products, and have come to the conclusion that I came to
at the time.-a 13 states were producing infected milk products, but 5 of them were not reporting infected dairy cattle at the time, and only 29
herds had been verified to be infected across the nation.-a The
researchers conclude that the dairy infection was more wide spread than
was being reported at the time, but the CDC and USDA never acted on FDA data, and did not start testing cattle in those states at that time.-a It
is just part of the stupidity of the CDC and USDA attempts to contain
the infection and prevent the next pandemic.-a They were just lucky that
the dairy virus was not very pathogenic in humans.-a It was lethal to
other mammals, but the humans infected showed only mild or no symptoms, while it infected the brains of cats and killed them.-a If it had been infecting the brains of dairy workers we would have likely seen a very different response instead of the political pussy footing and denial of reality that was observed.
Ron Okimoto
On 2/6/2026 9:57 AM, RonO wrote:
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/federal-testing-https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/more-avian-flu- outbreaks-pennsylvania-colorado
improves-detection-h5n1-avian-flu-us-dairy-herds
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/32/2/25-1332_article
The report was published in the same CDC newsletter that published the
study that H5N1 could survive the most common method of
pasteurization. The FDA claimed that they were going to test that
observation in order to insure a safe milk supply, but the testing was
never started.-a No processing plants producing virus containing milk
products was ever tested to see if the virus could survive
pasteurization.-a The Missouri patient and one of the California
children that was infected only had the pasteurized dairy products
that they consumed to link them to the dairy virus that infected
them.-a Both Missouri infections consumed the same batch of dairy
products before becoming ill (they lived in the same household).
For this report the Ohio researchers reanalyzed the FDAs original
testing of milk products, and have come to the conclusion that I came
to at the time.-a 13 states were producing infected milk products, but
5 of them were not reporting infected dairy cattle at the time, and
only 29 herds had been verified to be infected across the nation.-a The
researchers conclude that the dairy infection was more wide spread
than was being reported at the time, but the CDC and USDA never acted
on FDA data, and did not start testing cattle in those states at that
time.-a It is just part of the stupidity of the CDC and USDA attempts
to contain the infection and prevent the next pandemic.-a They were
just lucky that the dairy virus was not very pathogenic in humans.-a It
was lethal to other mammals, but the humans infected showed only mild
or no symptoms, while it infected the brains of cats and killed them.
If it had been infecting the brains of dairy workers we would have
likely seen a very different response instead of the political pussy
footing and denial of reality that was observed.
Ron Okimoto
They are not releasing the genotypes, so we do not know how these
infections are related.-a The 1.3 million layer flock in Colorado should
be investigated because Colorado is one of the states that started to
get reinfected dairy herds, but the USDA is not listing reinfected herds
as being currently infected, so we don't know where the reinfected herds
are nor how many there are.
Ron Okimoto
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/federal-testing- improves-detection-h5n1-avian-flu-us-dairy-herds
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/32/2/25-1332_article
The report was published in the same CDC newsletter that published the
study that H5N1 could survive the most common method of pasteurization.
The FDA claimed that they were going to test that observation in order
to insure a safe milk supply, but the testing was never started.-a No processing plants producing virus containing milk products was ever
tested to see if the virus could survive pasteurization.-a The Missouri patient and one of the California children that was infected only had
the pasteurized dairy products that they consumed to link them to the
dairy virus that infected them.-a Both Missouri infections consumed the
same batch of dairy products before becoming ill (they lived in the same household).
For this report the Ohio researchers reanalyzed the FDAs original
testing of milk products, and have come to the conclusion that I came to
at the time.-a 13 states were producing infected milk products, but 5 of them were not reporting infected dairy cattle at the time, and only 29
herds had been verified to be infected across the nation.-a The
researchers conclude that the dairy infection was more wide spread than
was being reported at the time, but the CDC and USDA never acted on FDA data, and did not start testing cattle in those states at that time.-a It
is just part of the stupidity of the CDC and USDA attempts to contain
the infection and prevent the next pandemic.-a They were just lucky that
the dairy virus was not very pathogenic in humans.-a It was lethal to
other mammals, but the humans infected showed only mild or no symptoms, while it infected the brains of cats and killed them.-a If it had been infecting the brains of dairy workers we would have likely seen a very different response instead of the political pussy footing and denial of reality that was observed.
Ron Okimoto
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/federal-testing- improves-detection-h5n1-avian-flu-us-dairy-herds
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/32/2/25-1332_article
The report was published in the same CDC newsletter that published the
study that H5N1 could survive the most common method of pasteurization.
The FDA claimed that they were going to test that observation in order
to insure a safe milk supply, but the testing was never started.-a No processing plants producing virus containing milk products was ever
tested to see if the virus could survive pasteurization.-a The Missouri patient and one of the California children that was infected only had
the pasteurized dairy products that they consumed to link them to the
dairy virus that infected them.-a Both Missouri infections consumed the
same batch of dairy products before becoming ill (they lived in the same household).
For this report the Ohio researchers reanalyzed the FDAs original
testing of milk products, and have come to the conclusion that I came to
at the time.-a 13 states were producing infected milk products, but 5 of them were not reporting infected dairy cattle at the time, and only 29
herds had been verified to be infected across the nation.-a The
researchers conclude that the dairy infection was more wide spread than
was being reported at the time, but the CDC and USDA never acted on FDA data, and did not start testing cattle in those states at that time.-a It
is just part of the stupidity of the CDC and USDA attempts to contain
the infection and prevent the next pandemic.-a They were just lucky that
the dairy virus was not very pathogenic in humans.-a It was lethal to
other mammals, but the humans infected showed only mild or no symptoms, while it infected the brains of cats and killed them.-a If it had been infecting the brains of dairy workers we would have likely seen a very different response instead of the political pussy footing and denial of reality that was observed.
Ron Okimoto
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/federal-testing- improves-detection-h5n1-avian-flu-us-dairy-herds
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/32/2/25-1332_article
The report was published in the same CDC newsletter that published the
study that H5N1 could survive the most common method of pasteurization.
The FDA claimed that they were going to test that observation in order
to insure a safe milk supply, but the testing was never started.-a No processing plants producing virus containing milk products was ever
tested to see if the virus could survive pasteurization.-a The Missouri patient and one of the California children that was infected only had
the pasteurized dairy products that they consumed to link them to the
dairy virus that infected them.-a Both Missouri infections consumed the
same batch of dairy products before becoming ill (they lived in the same household).
For this report the Ohio researchers reanalyzed the FDAs original
testing of milk products, and have come to the conclusion that I came to
at the time.-a 13 states were producing infected milk products, but 5 of them were not reporting infected dairy cattle at the time, and only 29
herds had been verified to be infected across the nation.-a The
researchers conclude that the dairy infection was more wide spread than
was being reported at the time, but the CDC and USDA never acted on FDA data, and did not start testing cattle in those states at that time.-a It
is just part of the stupidity of the CDC and USDA attempts to contain
the infection and prevent the next pandemic.-a They were just lucky that
the dairy virus was not very pathogenic in humans.-a It was lethal to
other mammals, but the humans infected showed only mild or no symptoms, while it infected the brains of cats and killed them.-a If it had been infecting the brains of dairy workers we would have likely seen a very different response instead of the political pussy footing and denial of reality that was observed.
Ron Okimoto
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/federal-testing- improves-detection-h5n1-avian-flu-us-dairy-herds
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/32/2/25-1332_article
The report was published in the same CDC newsletter that published the
study that H5N1 could survive the most common method of pasteurization.
The FDA claimed that they were going to test that observation in order
to insure a safe milk supply, but the testing was never started.-a No processing plants producing virus containing milk products was ever
tested to see if the virus could survive pasteurization.-a The Missouri patient and one of the California children that was infected only had
the pasteurized dairy products that they consumed to link them to the
dairy virus that infected them.-a Both Missouri infections consumed the
same batch of dairy products before becoming ill (they lived in the same household).
For this report the Ohio researchers reanalyzed the FDAs original
testing of milk products, and have come to the conclusion that I came to
at the time.-a 13 states were producing infected milk products, but 5 of them were not reporting infected dairy cattle at the time, and only 29
herds had been verified to be infected across the nation.-a The
researchers conclude that the dairy infection was more wide spread than
was being reported at the time, but the CDC and USDA never acted on FDA data, and did not start testing cattle in those states at that time.-a It
is just part of the stupidity of the CDC and USDA attempts to contain
the infection and prevent the next pandemic.-a They were just lucky that
the dairy virus was not very pathogenic in humans.-a It was lethal to
other mammals, but the humans infected showed only mild or no symptoms, while it infected the brains of cats and killed them.-a If it had been infecting the brains of dairy workers we would have likely seen a very different response instead of the political pussy footing and denial of reality that was observed.
Ron Okimoto
The report was published in the same CDC newsletter that
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 22:57:38 |
| Calls: | 810 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| D/L today: |
12 files (21,036K bytes) |
| Messages: | 195,759 |