1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. talk.origins

  • virtual particle ?

    From Dale@dalekellytoo@gmail.com to talk-origins on Fri Jan 23 09:43:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins


    if a virtual particle can come from nothing then why couldn't God make everything from nothing ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle

    especially if nothing is a piece of God ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism
    --
    Mystery? -> https://www.dalekelly.org/

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jillery@69jpil69@gmail.com to talk-origins on Sat Jan 24 23:50:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:43:29 -0500, Dale <dalekellytoo@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    if a virtual particle can come from nothing then why couldn't God make >everything from nothing ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle

    especially if nothing is a piece of God ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism
    Of course an omnipotent agent can do anything, by definition, and
    that's the fatal problem with "Goddidit".
    --
    To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dale@dalekellytoo@gmail.com to talk-origins on Sun Jan 25 13:53:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 1/24/2026 11:50 PM, jillery wrote:
    On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:43:29 -0500, Dale <dalekellytoo@gmail.com>
    wrote:


    if a virtual particle can come from nothing then why couldn't God make
    everything from nothing ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle

    especially if nothing is a piece of God ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism


    Of course an omnipotent agent can do anything, by definition, and
    that's the fatal problem with "Goddidit".



    God isn't omnipotent ?

    God cannot make God disappear from God forever ?

    God is everything not anything ?

    Wouldn't that be the hope for what God's choice is ?
    --
    Mystery? -> https://www.dalekelly.org/

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jillery@69jpil69@gmail.com to talk-origins on Sun Jan 25 23:37:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 13:53:43 -0500, Dale <dalekellytoo@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    On 1/24/2026 11:50 PM, jillery wrote:
    On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:43:29 -0500, Dale <dalekellytoo@gmail.com>
    wrote:


    if a virtual particle can come from nothing then why couldn't God make
    everything from nothing ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle

    especially if nothing is a piece of God ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism


    Of course an omnipotent agent can do anything, by definition, and
    that's the fatal problem with "Goddidit".



    God isn't omnipotent ?

    God cannot make God disappear from God forever ?
    The above falls into a category of logical conundrums which don't
    alter the basic premise. I stipulate for arguments' sake that making
    something from nothing, precisely defined, qualifies as an act of a
    godlike agent.
    God is everything not anything ?
    Omnipresence is different from omnipotence.
    Wouldn't that be the hope for what God's choice is ?
    Whatever choice doesn't alter the fundamental flaw in using gods as explanations.
    --
    To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2