• no ID ?

    From Dale@dalekellytoo@gmail.com to talk-origins on Thu Dec 18 06:52:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins


    does this mean non-intelligence does it ?
    --
    Mystery? -> https://www.dalekelly.org/

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonO@rokimoto557@gmail.com to talk-origins on Thu Dec 18 08:26:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 12/18/2025 5:52 AM, Dale wrote:

    does this mean non-intelligence does it ?

    What you are witnessing on TO is the fact that ID has been a bogus and dishonest creationist scam for decades, and that the proponents were
    fully aware of that, but continue to support the scam for religious reasons.

    Just because the ID creationist scam turned out to be bogus does not
    mean that there is no god or gods in existence. What the ID scam has demonstrated is that if some god exists that the Bible does not describe
    this god's achievments very accurately. The Bible has been known to be
    wrong about a lot of things about the creation for centuries. The ID
    scam has demonstrated that the Bible cannot be taken as a science
    textbook. Things just did not happen the way that they are described in
    the Bible.

    Most of the IDiots quit the ID scam on TO when they came to realize that
    the designer that fills the ID perp's gaps is not the designer described
    in the Bible. MarkE is the last of the IDiots because he can still lie
    to himself about reality.

    Ron Okimoto

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dale@dalekellytoo@gmail.com to talk-origins on Fri Dec 19 10:16:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 12/18/2025 9:26 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 5:52 AM, Dale wrote:

    does this mean non-intelligence does it ?

    What you are witnessing on TO is the fact that ID has been a bogus and dishonest creationist scam for decades, and that the proponents were
    fully aware of that, but continue to support the scam for religious
    reasons.

    Just because the ID creationist scam turned out to be bogus does not
    mean that there is no god or gods in existence.-a What the ID scam has demonstrated is that if some god exists that the Bible does not describe this god's achievments very accurately.-a The Bible has been known to be wrong about a lot of things about the creation for centuries.-a The ID
    scam has demonstrated that the Bible cannot be taken as a science textbook.-a Things just did not happen the way that they are described in the Bible.

    Most of the IDiots quit the ID scam on TO when they came to realize that
    the designer that fills the ID perp's gaps is not the designer described
    in the Bible.-a MarkE is the last of the IDiots because he can still lie
    to himself about reality.

    Ron Okimoto


    I seem to see requests to prove the Bible when the debate sought is just whether there is ID
    --
    Mystery? -> https://www.dalekelly.org/

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonO@rokimoto557@gmail.com to talk-origins on Fri Dec 19 10:35:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 12/19/2025 9:16 AM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 9:26 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 5:52 AM, Dale wrote:

    does this mean non-intelligence does it ?

    What you are witnessing on TO is the fact that ID has been a bogus and
    dishonest creationist scam for decades, and that the proponents were
    fully aware of that, but continue to support the scam for religious
    reasons.

    Just because the ID creationist scam turned out to be bogus does not
    mean that there is no god or gods in existence.-a What the ID scam has
    demonstrated is that if some god exists that the Bible does not
    describe this god's achievments very accurately.-a The Bible has been
    known to be wrong about a lot of things about the creation for
    centuries.-a The ID scam has demonstrated that the Bible cannot be
    taken as a science textbook.-a Things just did not happen the way that
    they are described in the Bible.

    Most of the IDiots quit the ID scam on TO when they came to realize
    that the designer that fills the ID perp's gaps is not the designer
    described in the Bible.-a MarkE is the last of the IDiots because he
    can still lie to himself about reality.

    Ron Okimoto


    I seem to see requests to prove the Bible when the debate sought is just whether there is ID

    There have been no request to prove or disprove the Bible in any way
    except from the creationists. That is known to be a lost cause for
    centuries and really isn't any topic worthy of discussion except for
    those that still believe that it can be done.

    There has not been any attempts to falsify the ID perp's god of the gaps denial stupidity. What has occurred on TO is that the IDiotic
    creationist rubes that fell for the ID scam were only supporting the creationist scam for dishonest religious reasons, and when they had
    their faces rubbed in the fact that they had never wanted the ID perps
    to produce any valid ID science (any valid ID science would just mean
    that the Bible was wrong about the creation) they quit supporting the ID
    scam. Only MarkE wants to keep wallowing in the gap denial so that he
    can keep lying to himself about reality.

    The fact is that just the existence of the ID scam Top Six gaps means
    that nature is not Biblical, and that the Bible is wrong about what the creator is supposed to have done. The Top Six gaps exist within the
    context of what we already understand about nature, and for Biblical creationists that believe that nature is the creation, it means that the creation is not Biblical. Any designer that the ID perps could
    demonstrate could fill those gaps would not be the designer described in
    the Bible. The reason to believe old earth creationists no longer claim
    to support the ID scam because they understand that ID does not support
    their Biblical creation model that they have up on their web page. The
    Top Six gaps do not fit into their creation model in the order in which
    they must have occurred in this universe. MarkE understands that fact
    because he refuses to acknowledge how filling the origin of life gap
    with some non Biblical god would affect his religious Biblical beliefs.

    Ron Okimoto

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dale@dalekellytoo@gmail.com to talk-origins on Fri Dec 19 13:20:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 12/19/2025 11:35 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 9:16 AM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 9:26 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 5:52 AM, Dale wrote:

    does this mean non-intelligence does it ?

    What you are witnessing on TO is the fact that ID has been a bogus
    and dishonest creationist scam for decades, and that the proponents
    were fully aware of that, but continue to support the scam for
    religious reasons.

    Just because the ID creationist scam turned out to be bogus does not
    mean that there is no god or gods in existence.-a What the ID scam has
    demonstrated is that if some god exists that the Bible does not
    describe this god's achievments very accurately.-a The Bible has been
    known to be wrong about a lot of things about the creation for
    centuries.-a The ID scam has demonstrated that the Bible cannot be
    taken as a science textbook.-a Things just did not happen the way that
    they are described in the Bible.

    Most of the IDiots quit the ID scam on TO when they came to realize
    that the designer that fills the ID perp's gaps is not the designer
    described in the Bible.-a MarkE is the last of the IDiots because he
    can still lie to himself about reality.

    Ron Okimoto


    I seem to see requests to prove the Bible when the debate sought is
    just whether there is ID




    There have been no request to prove or disprove the Bible in any way
    except from the creationists.

    seen it happen here
    --
    Mystery? -> https://www.dalekelly.org/

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonO@rokimoto557@gmail.com to talk-origins on Fri Dec 19 15:40:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 12/19/2025 12:20 PM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 11:35 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 9:16 AM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 9:26 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 5:52 AM, Dale wrote:

    does this mean non-intelligence does it ?

    What you are witnessing on TO is the fact that ID has been a bogus
    and dishonest creationist scam for decades, and that the proponents
    were fully aware of that, but continue to support the scam for
    religious reasons.

    Just because the ID creationist scam turned out to be bogus does not
    mean that there is no god or gods in existence.-a What the ID scam
    has demonstrated is that if some god exists that the Bible does not
    describe this god's achievments very accurately.-a The Bible has been >>>> known to be wrong about a lot of things about the creation for
    centuries.-a The ID scam has demonstrated that the Bible cannot be
    taken as a science textbook.-a Things just did not happen the way
    that they are described in the Bible.

    Most of the IDiots quit the ID scam on TO when they came to realize
    that the designer that fills the ID perp's gaps is not the designer
    described in the Bible.-a MarkE is the last of the IDiots because he
    can still lie to himself about reality.

    Ron Okimoto


    I seem to see requests to prove the Bible when the debate sought is
    just whether there is ID




    There have been no request to prove or disprove the Bible in any way
    except from the creationists.

    seen it happen here

    Your powers of observation seem to be the cause of a lot of your posts
    never amounting to much of anything. The whole point of the creationist attempts to make their scientific creationist claims and their renaming
    that effort intelligent design was because the creationists claimed that
    they could do the same science as everyone else and support their
    Biblical creationist beliefs. The creationists are the ones that want
    to use science to support their Biblical beliefs. Science doesn't care
    what their Biblical beliefs are. The plain and simple facts are that it
    has always been up to the creationists to demonstrate that they can
    support their religious beliefs with science. The scientific
    creationist effort ended in abject failure, and the intelligent design
    scam pretty much ended with the ID perps running a bait and switch scam instead of put up their junk for evaluation like the scientific
    creationists had done before them. Their junk was only publically
    evaluated where it mattered when their bait and switch efforts failed
    and the creationist rubes tried to teach the nonexistant science anyway.
    If this had not happened the ID perps would have never had, had to demonstrate how worthless their scam junk was.

    It has always been the scientific and intelligent design creationists
    that have wanted to use science to support their Biblical beliefs. The
    fact that they failed is their problem and not anyone elses.

    Ron Okimoto


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dale@dalekellytoo@gmail.com to talk-origins on Fri Dec 19 18:18:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 12/19/2025 4:40 PM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 12:20 PM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 11:35 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 9:16 AM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 9:26 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 5:52 AM, Dale wrote:

    does this mean non-intelligence does it ?

    What you are witnessing on TO is the fact that ID has been a bogus
    and dishonest creationist scam for decades, and that the proponents >>>>> were fully aware of that, but continue to support the scam for
    religious reasons.

    Just because the ID creationist scam turned out to be bogus does
    not mean that there is no god or gods in existence.-a What the ID
    scam has demonstrated is that if some god exists that the Bible
    does not describe this god's achievments very accurately.-a The
    Bible has been known to be wrong about a lot of things about the
    creation for centuries.-a The ID scam has demonstrated that the
    Bible cannot be taken as a science textbook.-a Things just did not
    happen the way that they are described in the Bible.

    Most of the IDiots quit the ID scam on TO when they came to realize >>>>> that the designer that fills the ID perp's gaps is not the designer >>>>> described in the Bible.-a MarkE is the last of the IDiots because he >>>>> can still lie to himself about reality.

    Ron Okimoto


    I seem to see requests to prove the Bible when the debate sought is
    just whether there is ID




    There have been no request to prove or disprove the Bible in any way
    except from the creationists.

    seen it happen here

    Your powers of observation seem to be the cause of a lot of your posts
    never amounting to much of anything.-a The whole point of the creationist attempts to make their scientific creationist claims and their renaming
    that effort intelligent design was because the creationists claimed that they could do the same science as everyone else and support their
    Biblical creationist beliefs.-a The creationists are the ones that want
    to use science to support their Biblical beliefs.-a Science doesn't care what their Biblical beliefs are.-a The plain and simple facts are that it has always been up to the creationists to demonstrate that they can
    support their religious beliefs with science.-a The scientific
    creationist effort ended in abject failure, and the intelligent design
    scam pretty much ended with the ID perps running a bait and switch scam instead of put up their junk for evaluation like the scientific
    creationists had done before them.-a Their junk was only publically evaluated where it mattered when their bait and switch efforts failed
    and the creationist rubes tried to teach the nonexistant science anyway.
    -aIf this had not happened the ID perps would have never had, had to demonstrate how worthless their scam junk was.

    It has always been the scientific and intelligent design creationists
    that have wanted to use science to support their Biblical beliefs.-a The fact that they failed is their problem and not anyone elses.

    Ron Okimoto




    There are some good things in the Bible ?

    The tree of life is a mother's womb ?

    The garden of Eden is planting/harvesting by family relations ?

    Leaving Eden completely to plant/sow/harvest ones own garden is the
    "human condition"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_condition
    --
    Mystery? -> https://www.dalekelly.org/

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dale@dalekellytoo@gmail.com to talk-origins on Mon Dec 22 20:54:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 12/19/2025 6:18 PM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 4:40 PM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 12:20 PM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 11:35 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 9:16 AM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 9:26 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 5:52 AM, Dale wrote:

    does this mean non-intelligence does it ?

    What you are witnessing on TO is the fact that ID has been a bogus >>>>>> and dishonest creationist scam for decades, and that the
    proponents were fully aware of that, but continue to support the
    scam for religious reasons.

    Just because the ID creationist scam turned out to be bogus does
    not mean that there is no god or gods in existence.-a What the ID >>>>>> scam has demonstrated is that if some god exists that the Bible
    does not describe this god's achievments very accurately.-a The
    Bible has been known to be wrong about a lot of things about the
    creation for centuries.-a The ID scam has demonstrated that the
    Bible cannot be taken as a science textbook.-a Things just did not >>>>>> happen the way that they are described in the Bible.

    Most of the IDiots quit the ID scam on TO when they came to
    realize that the designer that fills the ID perp's gaps is not the >>>>>> designer described in the Bible.-a MarkE is the last of the IDiots >>>>>> because he can still lie to himself about reality.

    Ron Okimoto


    I seem to see requests to prove the Bible when the debate sought is >>>>> just whether there is ID




    There have been no request to prove or disprove the Bible in any way
    except from the creationists.

    seen it happen here

    Your powers of observation seem to be the cause of a lot of your posts
    never amounting to much of anything.-a The whole point of the
    creationist attempts to make their scientific creationist claims and
    their renaming that effort intelligent design was because the
    creationists claimed that they could do the same science as everyone
    else and support their Biblical creationist beliefs.-a The creationists
    are the ones that want to use science to support their Biblical
    beliefs.-a Science doesn't care what their Biblical beliefs are.-a The
    plain and simple facts are that it has always been up to the
    creationists to demonstrate that they can support their religious
    beliefs with science.-a The scientific creationist effort ended in
    abject failure, and the intelligent design scam pretty much ended with
    the ID perps running a bait and switch scam instead of put up their
    junk for evaluation like the scientific creationists had done before
    them.-a Their junk was only publically evaluated where it mattered when
    their bait and switch efforts failed and the creationist rubes tried
    to teach the nonexistant science anyway. -a-aIf this had not happened
    the ID perps would have never had, had to demonstrate how worthless
    their scam junk was.

    It has always been the scientific and intelligent design creationists
    that have wanted to use science to support their Biblical beliefs.
    The fact that they failed is their problem and not anyone elses.

    Ron Okimoto




    There are some good things in the Bible ?

    The tree of life is a mother's womb ?

    The garden of Eden is planting/harvesting by family relations ?

    Leaving Eden completely to plant/sow/harvest ones own garden is the
    "human condition"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_condition


    More good Bible thoughts around Christmas ?

    I have some simple new thinking of mine I put on my Website.

    "Garden of Eden"
    "Christmas"

    On the HOME selection of my Site there are links to thoughts.

    On the BLOG selection of my my Site the thoughts can be found.

    https://www.dalekelly.org/
    --
    Mystery? -> https://www.dalekelly.org/

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonO@rokimoto557@gmail.com to talk-origins on Tue Dec 23 10:58:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 12/22/2025 7:54 PM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 6:18 PM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 4:40 PM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 12:20 PM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 11:35 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 9:16 AM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 9:26 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 5:52 AM, Dale wrote:

    does this mean non-intelligence does it ?

    What you are witnessing on TO is the fact that ID has been a
    bogus and dishonest creationist scam for decades, and that the
    proponents were fully aware of that, but continue to support the >>>>>>> scam for religious reasons.

    Just because the ID creationist scam turned out to be bogus does >>>>>>> not mean that there is no god or gods in existence.-a What the ID >>>>>>> scam has demonstrated is that if some god exists that the Bible >>>>>>> does not describe this god's achievments very accurately.-a The >>>>>>> Bible has been known to be wrong about a lot of things about the >>>>>>> creation for centuries.-a The ID scam has demonstrated that the >>>>>>> Bible cannot be taken as a science textbook.-a Things just did not >>>>>>> happen the way that they are described in the Bible.

    Most of the IDiots quit the ID scam on TO when they came to
    realize that the designer that fills the ID perp's gaps is not
    the designer described in the Bible.-a MarkE is the last of the >>>>>>> IDiots because he can still lie to himself about reality.

    Ron Okimoto


    I seem to see requests to prove the Bible when the debate sought
    is just whether there is ID




    There have been no request to prove or disprove the Bible in any
    way except from the creationists.

    seen it happen here

    Your powers of observation seem to be the cause of a lot of your
    posts never amounting to much of anything.-a The whole point of the
    creationist attempts to make their scientific creationist claims and
    their renaming that effort intelligent design was because the
    creationists claimed that they could do the same science as everyone
    else and support their Biblical creationist beliefs.-a The
    creationists are the ones that want to use science to support their
    Biblical beliefs.-a Science doesn't care what their Biblical beliefs
    are.-a The plain and simple facts are that it has always been up to
    the creationists to demonstrate that they can support their religious
    beliefs with science.-a The scientific creationist effort ended in
    abject failure, and the intelligent design scam pretty much ended
    with the ID perps running a bait and switch scam instead of put up
    their junk for evaluation like the scientific creationists had done
    before them.-a Their junk was only publically evaluated where it
    mattered when their bait and switch efforts failed and the
    creationist rubes tried to teach the nonexistant science anyway. -a-aIf >>> this had not happened the ID perps would have never had, had to
    demonstrate how worthless their scam junk was.

    It has always been the scientific and intelligent design creationists
    that have wanted to use science to support their Biblical beliefs.
    The fact that they failed is their problem and not anyone elses.

    Ron Okimoto




    There are some good things in the Bible ?

    The tree of life is a mother's womb ?

    The garden of Eden is planting/harvesting by family relations ?

    Leaving Eden completely to plant/sow/harvest ones own garden is the
    "human condition"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_condition


    More good Bible thoughts around Christmas ?

    I have some simple new thinking of mine I put on my Website.

    "Garden of Eden"
    "Christmas"

    On the HOME selection of my Site there are links to thoughts.

    On the BLOG selection of my my Site the thoughts can be found.

    https://www.dalekelly.org/


    You are an example of people finding what ever they want to find in the
    Bible, and you are also an example of why that isn't a desirable aspect
    of the Bible.

    Ron Okimoto

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dale@dalekellytoo@gmail.com to talk-origins on Tue Dec 23 22:27:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 12/23/2025 11:58 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/22/2025 7:54 PM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 6:18 PM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 4:40 PM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 12:20 PM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 11:35 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/19/2025 9:16 AM, Dale wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 9:26 AM, RonO wrote:
    On 12/18/2025 5:52 AM, Dale wrote:

    does this mean non-intelligence does it ?

    What you are witnessing on TO is the fact that ID has been a
    bogus and dishonest creationist scam for decades, and that the >>>>>>>> proponents were fully aware of that, but continue to support the >>>>>>>> scam for religious reasons.

    Just because the ID creationist scam turned out to be bogus does >>>>>>>> not mean that there is no god or gods in existence.-a What the ID >>>>>>>> scam has demonstrated is that if some god exists that the Bible >>>>>>>> does not describe this god's achievments very accurately.-a The >>>>>>>> Bible has been known to be wrong about a lot of things about the >>>>>>>> creation for centuries.-a The ID scam has demonstrated that the >>>>>>>> Bible cannot be taken as a science textbook.-a Things just did >>>>>>>> not happen the way that they are described in the Bible.

    Most of the IDiots quit the ID scam on TO when they came to
    realize that the designer that fills the ID perp's gaps is not >>>>>>>> the designer described in the Bible.-a MarkE is the last of the >>>>>>>> IDiots because he can still lie to himself about reality.

    Ron Okimoto


    I seem to see requests to prove the Bible when the debate sought >>>>>>> is just whether there is ID




    There have been no request to prove or disprove the Bible in any
    way except from the creationists.

    seen it happen here

    Your powers of observation seem to be the cause of a lot of your
    posts never amounting to much of anything.-a The whole point of the
    creationist attempts to make their scientific creationist claims and
    their renaming that effort intelligent design was because the
    creationists claimed that they could do the same science as everyone
    else and support their Biblical creationist beliefs.-a The
    creationists are the ones that want to use science to support their
    Biblical beliefs.-a Science doesn't care what their Biblical beliefs
    are.-a The plain and simple facts are that it has always been up to
    the creationists to demonstrate that they can support their
    religious beliefs with science.-a The scientific creationist effort
    ended in abject failure, and the intelligent design scam pretty much
    ended with the ID perps running a bait and switch scam instead of
    put up their junk for evaluation like the scientific creationists
    had done before them.-a Their junk was only publically evaluated
    where it mattered when their bait and switch efforts failed and the
    creationist rubes tried to teach the nonexistant science anyway.
    -a-aIf this had not happened the ID perps would have never had, had to >>>> demonstrate how worthless their scam junk was.

    It has always been the scientific and intelligent design
    creationists that have wanted to use science to support their
    Biblical beliefs. The fact that they failed is their problem and not
    anyone elses.

    Ron Okimoto




    There are some good things in the Bible ?

    The tree of life is a mother's womb ?

    The garden of Eden is planting/harvesting by family relations ?

    Leaving Eden completely to plant/sow/harvest ones own garden is the
    "human condition"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_condition


    More good Bible thoughts around Christmas ?

    I have some simple new thinking of mine I put on my Website.

    "Garden of Eden"
    "Christmas"

    On the HOME selection of my Site there are links to thoughts.

    On the BLOG selection of my my Site the thoughts can be found.

    https://www.dalekelly.org/


    You are an example of people finding what ever they want to find in the Bible, and you are also an example of why that isn't a desirable aspect
    of the Bible.

    Ron Okimoto



    Bible is Bad ?

    Bi ble ?

    Buy Bull ?

    Buy a Bull Market ?

    Without Market Volatility ?

    Old Test a Meant ?
    (Testament)

    New Test a Meant ?
    (Testament)
    --
    Mystery? -> https://www.dalekelly.org/

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2