Why can the PNN Propulsion reach and colonize both the Moon and Mars?
Because through the real, not fake, violation of Newton's principle of action and reaction, PNN thrust increases over time for the same amount of energy used.
This is first demonstrated with a prototype on a ballistic pendulum F432 powered by an external amplifier https://player.vimeo.com/video/476068648
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser, not only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending on the fact that the
thrust increases over time.
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of the previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a remote control on
a Kern electronic scale display. Once with upward thrust http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf
And then with downward thrust when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees http://www.asps.it/spintapnnbasso.pdf .
Unfortunately, the lithium batteries discharge over a time interval ranging from zero seconds to about 120 to 150 seconds.
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Why can the PNN Propulsion reach and colonize both the Moon and Mars?
Ask that question when it can reach the ceiling of your mother's dining
room.
Because through the real, not fake, violation of Newton's principle of action and reaction, PNN thrust increases over time for the same amount of energy used.
This is first demonstrated with a prototype on a ballistic pendulum F432 powered by an external amplifier https://player.vimeo.com/video/476068648
No explanation of what's supposedly going on there. Just a couple laser pointer spots on the wall. Nothing to see here. Can you elaborate?
Maybe you need more tin foil over your oscilloscope.
BTW, there's something borked with your other vimeos that are referenced
at the end of this video. They don't play, they only flash.
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser, not only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending on the fact that the
thrust increases over time.
Based on your previous explanation of the PNN drive, there's no reason
why the thrust should build up slowly. Can you give a theoretical explanation for that?
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of the previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a remote control on
a Kern electronic scale display. Once with upward thrust http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf
And then with downward thrust when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees http://www.asps.it/spintapnnbasso.pdf .
Unfortunately, the lithium batteries discharge over a time interval ranging from zero seconds to about 120 to 150 seconds.
Just use an external power source for now, until you demonstrate some
actual thrust. Later perhaps you can find a battery with lower internal resistance. The flying submarine (coming soon) will have an unlimited payload weight budget, right?
Rufus <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Why can the PNN Propulsion reach and colonize both the Moon and Mars?
Ask that question when it can reach the ceiling of your mother's dining room.
Because through the real, not fake, violation of Newton's principle of action and reaction, PNN thrust increases over time for the same amount of energy used.
This is first demonstrated with a prototype on a ballistic pendulum F432 powered by an external amplifier https://player.vimeo.com/video/476068648
No explanation of what's supposedly going on there. Just a couple laser pointer spots on the wall. Nothing to see here. Can you elaborate?
Maybe you need more tin foil over your oscilloscope.
BTW, there's something borked with your other vimeos that are referenced
at the end of this video. They don't play, they only flash.
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser, not only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending on the fact that the
thrust increases over time.
Based on your previous explanation of the PNN drive, there's no reason
why the thrust should build up slowly. Can you give a theoretical explanation for that?
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of the previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a remote control on
a Kern electronic scale display. Once with upward thrust http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf
And then with downward thrust when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees http://www.asps.it/spintapnnbasso.pdf .
Unfortunately, the lithium batteries discharge over a time interval ranging from zero seconds to about 120 to 150 seconds.
Just use an external power source for now, until you demonstrate some actual thrust. Later perhaps you can find a battery with lower internal resistance. The flying submarine (coming soon) will have an unlimited payload weight budget, right?
Complimenti allAASPS team : nemo propheta in patria
aa..
For the record I wanted to say that I continue to strongly support ASPS
and the PNN drive.
I have no desire whatsoever to disprove it.
Because I genuinely want to replicate your results.
In my professional opinion, the ASPS team has already proved that
this works when they demonstrated the battery powered version.
My personal failure to get thrust out of the attempted replicati
on I constructed does not detract at all from the multiple successes
of the ASPS team or the PNN drive technology.
I remain totally convinced it works and am not afraid to tell doubters! a..
a.. From Nova Astronautica n.186 www.asps.it/vol45.htm
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Why can the PNN Propulsion reach and colonize both the Moon and
Mars?
Ask that question when it can reach the ceiling of your mother's
dining room.
Because through the real, not fake, violation of Newton's principle
of action and reaction, PNN thrust increases over time for the same
amount of energy used.
This is first demonstrated with a prototype on a ballistic
pendulum F432 powered by an external amplifier
https://player.vimeo.com/video/476068648
No explanation of what's supposedly going on there. Just a couple
laser pointer spots on the wall. Nothing to see here. Can you
elaborate?
Maybe you need more tin foil over your oscilloscope.
BTW, there's something borked with your other vimeos that are
referenced at the end of this video. They don't play, they only
flash.
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser, not
only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending on the
fact that the
thrust increases over time.
Based on your previous explanation of the PNN drive, there's no
reason why the thrust should build up slowly. Can you give a
theoretical explanation for that?
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of the
previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a remote
control on a Kern electronic scale display. Once with upward thrust
http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf And then with downward thrust
when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees
http://www.asps.it/spintapnnbasso.pdf .
Unfortunately, the lithium batteries discharge over a time interval
ranging from zero seconds to about 120 to 150 seconds.
Just use an external power source for now, until you demonstrate some
actual thrust. Later perhaps you can find a battery with lower
internal resistance. The flying submarine (coming soon) will have an
unlimited payload weight budget, right?
Complimenti all-AASPS team : nemo propheta in patria
-a-a..
For the record I wanted to say that I continue to strongly support ASPS
and the PNN drive.
I have no desire whatsoever to disprove it.
Because I genuinely want to replicate your results.
In my professional opinion, the ASPS team has already proved that this
works when they demonstrated the battery powered version.
My personal failure to get thrust out of the attempted replicati on I
constructed does not detract at all from the multiple successes of the
ASPS team or the PNN drive technology.
I remain totally convinced it works and am not afraid to tell doubters!
-a..
-a.. From Nova Astronautica n.186 www.asps.it/vol45.htm
Why is it difficult for even ASPS members to convince themselves that
their magical drive really works?
I mean, either the submarine flies or it doesn't, right?
Uhmm... right?
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Why can the PNN Propulsion reach and colonize both the Moon and Mars?
Ask that question when it can reach the ceiling of your mother's dining room.
Because through the real, not fake, violation of Newton's principle of action and reaction, PNN thrust increases over time for the same amount of energy used.
This is first demonstrated with a prototype on a ballistic pendulum F432 powered by an external amplifier https://player.vimeo.com/video/476068648
No explanation of what's supposedly going on there. Just a couple laser pointer spots on the wall. Nothing to see here. Can you elaborate?
Maybe you need more tin foil over your oscilloscope.
BTW, there's something borked with your other vimeos that are referenced at the end of this video. They don't play, they only flash.
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser, not only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending on the fact that the
thrust increases over time.
Based on your previous explanation of the PNN drive, there's no reason why the thrust should build up slowly. Can you give a theoretical explanation for that?
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of the previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a remote control on
a Kern electronic scale display. Once with upward thrust http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf
And then with downward thrust when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees http://www.asps.it/spintapnnbasso.pdf .
Unfortunately, the lithium batteries discharge over a time interval ranging from zero seconds to about 120 to 150 seconds.
Just use an external power source for now, until you demonstrate some actual thrust. Later perhaps you can find a battery with lower internal resistance. The flying submarine (coming soon) will have an unlimited payload weight budget, right?
Complimenti all-AASPS team : nemo propheta in patria
-a-a..
For the record I wanted to say that I continue to strongly support ASPS and the PNN drive.
I have no desire whatsoever to disprove it.
Because I genuinely want to replicate your results.
In my professional opinion, the ASPS team has already proved that
this works when they demonstrated the battery powered version.
My personal failure to get thrust out of the attempted replicati
on I constructed does not detract at all from the multiple successes
of the ASPS team or the PNN drive technology.
I remain totally convinced it works and am not afraid to tell doubters! -a..
-a.. From Nova Astronautica n.186 www.asps.it/vol45.htm
Why is it difficult for even ASPS members to convince themselves that
their magical drive really works?
I mean, either the submarine flies or it doesn't, right?
Uhmm... right?
On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 21:01:43 -0800, Rufus wrote:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser, not
only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending on the
fact that the
thrust increases over time.
Based on your previous explanation of the PNN drive, there's no
reason why the thrust should build up slowly. Can you give a
theoretical explanation for that?
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of the
previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a remote
control on a Kern electronic scale display. Once with upward thrust
http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf And then with downward thrust
when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees
For the record I wanted to say that I continue to strongly support ASPS
and the PNN drive.
I have no desire whatsoever to disprove it.
Because I genuinely want to replicate your results.
In my professional opinion, the ASPS team has already proved that this
works when they demonstrated the battery powered version.
My personal failure to get thrust out of the attempted replicati on I
constructed does not detract at all from the multiple successes of the
ASPS team or the PNN drive technology.
I remain totally convinced it works and am not afraid to tell doubters!
?..
?.. From Nova Astronautica n.186 www.asps.it/vol45.htm
Why is it difficult for even ASPS members to convince themselves that
their magical drive really works?
I mean, either the submarine flies or it doesn't, right?
Uhmm... right?
Hey Rosco, I am absolutely *sure* that the prototype WORKS.
No matter what others say.
Von Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 21:01:43 -0800, Rufus wrote:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser,
not only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending
on the fact that the
thrust increases over time.
Based on your previous explanation of the PNN drive, there's no
reason why the thrust should build up slowly. Can you give a
theoretical explanation for that?
No reply. It's eerie how the PNN Magic SuperDrive guys clam up when
somebody asks technical stuff. You'd almost think they don't know.
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of
the previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a
remote control on a Kern electronic scale display. Once with
upward thrust http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf And then with
downward thrust when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees
Ok, so the warp drive works pretty good when it's flying downhill. The acceleration ramps up to just about 1 G!
SKEPTICS, PREPARE TO BE AMAZED!!!!!!!!!
For the record I wanted to say that I continue to strongly support
ASPS and the PNN drive.
I have no desire whatsoever to disprove it.
Because I genuinely want to replicate your results.
In my professional opinion, the ASPS team has already proved that
this works when they demonstrated the battery powered version.
My personal failure to get thrust out of the attempted replicati on
I constructed does not detract at all from the multiple successes of
the ASPS team or the PNN drive technology.
I remain totally convinced it works and am not afraid to tell
doubters!
?..
?.. From Nova Astronautica n.186 www.asps.it/vol45.htm
Why is it difficult for even ASPS members to convince themselves that
their magical drive really works?
I mean, either the submarine flies or it doesn't, right?
Uhmm... right?
Hey Rosco, I am absolutely *sure* that the prototype WORKS.
No matter what others say.
I see... you've never actually seen it flying either. You simply take
it on faith, like any devout believer should.
Amen.
Von Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 21:01:43 -0800, Rufus wrote:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser,
not only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending
on the fact that the
thrust increases over time.
Based on your previous explanation of the PNN drive, there's no
reason why the thrust should build up slowly. Can you give a
theoretical explanation for that?
No reply. It's eerie how the PNN Magic SuperDrive guys clam up when
somebody asks technical stuff. You'd almost think they don't know.
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of
the previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a
remote control on a Kern electronic scale display. Once with
upward thrust http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf And then with
downward thrust when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees
Ok, so the warp drive works pretty good when it's flying downhill. The acceleration ramps up to just about 1 G!
SKEPTICS, PREPARE TO BE AMAZED!!!!!!!!!
For the record I wanted to say that I continue to strongly support
ASPS and the PNN drive.
I have no desire whatsoever to disprove it.
Because I genuinely want to replicate your results.
In my professional opinion, the ASPS team has already proved that
this works when they demonstrated the battery powered version.
My personal failure to get thrust out of the attempted replicati on
I constructed does not detract at all from the multiple successes of
the ASPS team or the PNN drive technology.
I remain totally convinced it works and am not afraid to tell
doubters!
?..
?.. From Nova Astronautica n.186 www.asps.it/vol45.htm
Why is it difficult for even ASPS members to convince themselves that
their magical drive really works?
I mean, either the submarine flies or it doesn't, right?
Uhmm... right?
Hey Rosco, I am absolutely *sure* that the prototype WORKS.
No matter what others say.
I see... you've never actually seen it flying either. You simply take
it on faith, like any devout believer should.
Amen.
On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:00:32 -0800, Rufus wrote:
Von Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 21:01:43 -0800, Rufus wrote:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser,
not only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending
on the fact that the
thrust increases over time.
Based on your previous explanation of the PNN drive, there's no
reason why the thrust should build up slowly. Can you give a
theoretical explanation for that?
No reply. It's eerie how the PNN Magic SuperDrive guys clam up when
somebody asks technical stuff. You'd almost think they don't know.
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of
the previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a
remote control on a Kern electronic scale display. Once with
upward thrust http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf And then with >>>>>>> downward thrust when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees
Ok, so the warp drive works pretty good when it's flying downhill. The
acceleration ramps up to just about 1 G!
SKEPTICS, PREPARE TO BE AMAZED!!!!!!!!!
For the record I wanted to say that I continue to strongly support
ASPS and the PNN drive.
I have no desire whatsoever to disprove it.
Because I genuinely want to replicate your results.
In my professional opinion, the ASPS team has already proved that
this works when they demonstrated the battery powered version.
My personal failure to get thrust out of the attempted replicati on
I constructed does not detract at all from the multiple successes of >>>>> the ASPS team or the PNN drive technology.
I remain totally convinced it works and am not afraid to tell
doubters!
?..
?.. From Nova Astronautica n.186 www.asps.it/vol45.htm
Why is it difficult for even ASPS members to convince themselves that
their magical drive really works?
I mean, either the submarine flies or it doesn't, right?
Uhmm... right?
Hey Rosco, I am absolutely *sure* that the prototype WORKS.
No matter what others say.
I see... you've never actually seen it flying either. You simply take
it on faith, like any devout believer should.
Amen.
Absolutely not. I have assisted to pnn tests on pendulum, it is as simple
as that.
On 21/01/2026 11:22, Von Ottone wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:00:32 -0800, Rufus wrote:
Von Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 21:01:43 -0800, Rufus wrote:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser, >>>>>>>> not only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending on >>>>>>>> the fact that the
thrust increases over time.
Based on your previous explanation of the PNN drive, there's no
reason why the thrust should build up slowly. Can you give a
theoretical explanation for that?
No reply. It's eerie how the PNN Magic SuperDrive guys clam up when
somebody asks technical stuff. You'd almost think they don't know.
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of >>>>>>>> the previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a >>>>>>>> remote control on a Kern electronic scale display. Once with
upward thrust http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf And then with >>>>>>>> downward thrust when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees
Ok, so the warp drive works pretty good when it's flying downhill.
The acceleration ramps up to just about 1 G!
SKEPTICS, PREPARE TO BE AMAZED!!!!!!!!!
For the record I wanted to say that I continue to strongly support >>>>>> ASPS and the PNN drive.
I have no desire whatsoever to disprove it.
Because I genuinely want to replicate your results.
In my professional opinion, the ASPS team has already proved that
this works when they demonstrated the battery powered version.
My personal failure to get thrust out of the attempted replicati on >>>>>> I constructed does not detract at all from the multiple successes
of the ASPS team or the PNN drive technology.
I remain totally convinced it works and am not afraid to tell
doubters!
?..
?.. From Nova Astronautica n.186 www.asps.it/vol45.htm
Why is it difficult for even ASPS members to convince themselves
that their magical drive really works?
I mean, either the submarine flies or it doesn't, right?
Uhmm... right?
Hey Rosco, I am absolutely *sure* that the prototype WORKS.
No matter what others say.
I see... you've never actually seen it flying either. You simply take
it on faith, like any devout believer should.
Amen.
Absolutely not. I have assisted to pnn tests on pendulum, it is as
simple as that.
No, flying is not as simple as a pendulum.
On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 12:06:38 +0200, Mikko wrote:
On 21/01/2026 11:22, Von Ottone wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:00:32 -0800, Rufus wrote:
Von Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 21:01:43 -0800, Rufus wrote:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser, >>>>>>>> not only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending on >>>>>>>> the fact that the
thrust increases over time.
Based on your previous explanation of the PNN drive, there's no >>>>>>> reason why the thrust should build up slowly. Can you give a
theoretical explanation for that?
No reply. It's eerie how the PNN Magic SuperDrive guys clam up when
somebody asks technical stuff. You'd almost think they don't know.
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of >>>>>>>> the previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a >>>>>>>> remote control on a Kern electronic scale display. Once with >>>>>>>> upward thrust http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf And then with >>>>>>>> downward thrust when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees
Ok, so the warp drive works pretty good when it's flying downhill.
The acceleration ramps up to just about 1 G!
SKEPTICS, PREPARE TO BE AMAZED!!!!!!!!!
For the record I wanted to say that I continue to strongly support >>>>>> ASPS and the PNN drive.
I have no desire whatsoever to disprove it.
Because I genuinely want to replicate your results.
In my professional opinion, the ASPS team has already proved that >>>>>> this works when they demonstrated the battery powered version.
My personal failure to get thrust out of the attempted replicati on >>>>>> I constructed does not detract at all from the multiple successes >>>>>> of the ASPS team or the PNN drive technology.
I remain totally convinced it works and am not afraid to tell
doubters!
?..
?.. From Nova Astronautica n.186 www.asps.it/vol45.htm
Why is it difficult for even ASPS members to convince themselves
that their magical drive really works?
I mean, either the submarine flies or it doesn't, right?
Uhmm... right?
Hey Rosco, I am absolutely *sure* that the prototype WORKS.
No matter what others say.
I see... you've never actually seen it flying either. You simply take >>> it on faith, like any devout believer should.
Amen.
Absolutely not. I have assisted to pnn tests on pendulum, it is as
simple as that.
No, flying is not as simple as a pendulum.
That does not affects the fact that pnn works.
Von Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 12:06:38 +0200, Mikko wrote:
On 21/01/2026 11:22, Von Ottone wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:00:32 -0800, Rufus wrote:
Von Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 21:01:43 -0800, Rufus wrote:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
In the video, the prototype's index, illuminated by the laser,
not only moves from left to right but goes off scale depending
on the fact that the
thrust increases over time.
Based on your previous explanation of the PNN drive, there's no
reason why the thrust should build up slowly. Can you give a
theoretical explanation for that?
No reply. It's eerie how the PNN Magic SuperDrive guys clam up
when somebody asks technical stuff. You'd almost think they don't
know.
The same is demonstrated by the F432BA prototype (a variant of
the previous one) but powered by batteries and operated with a
remote control on a Kern electronic scale display. Once with
upward thrust http://www.asps.it/spintapnnalto.pdf And then
with downward thrust when the prototype is rotated 180 degrees
Ok, so the warp drive works pretty good when it's flying downhill.
The acceleration ramps up to just about 1 G!
SKEPTICS, PREPARE TO BE AMAZED!!!!!!!!!
For the record I wanted to say that I continue to strongly
support ASPS and the PNN drive.
I have no desire whatsoever to disprove it.
Because I genuinely want to replicate your results.
In my professional opinion, the ASPS team has already proved
that this works when they demonstrated the battery powered
version.
My personal failure to get thrust out of the attempted replicati
on I constructed does not detract at all from the multiple
successes of the ASPS team or the PNN drive technology.
I remain totally convinced it works and am not afraid to tell
doubters!
?..
?.. From Nova Astronautica n.186 www.asps.it/vol45.htm
Why is it difficult for even ASPS members to convince themselves
that their magical drive really works?
I mean, either the submarine flies or it doesn't, right?
Uhmm... right?
Hey Rosco, I am absolutely *sure* that the prototype WORKS.
No matter what others say.
I see... you've never actually seen it flying either. You simply
take it on faith, like any devout believer should.
Amen.
Absolutely not. I have assisted to pnn tests on pendulum, it is as
simple as that.
No, flying is not as simple as a pendulum.
That does not affects the fact that pnn works.
Translation: "Ok, I lied before, but I swear I'm not lying this time!
Trust me on that!"
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 21:00:26 |
| Calls: | 810 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| D/L today: |
11 files (21,026K bytes) |
| Messages: | 194,568 |