• Go ahead and meet someone!

    From ram@ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) to sci.physics.relativity on Sun Mar 1 21:17:15 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    You can dive into a black hole and another person can dive
    into another black hole way off, and you wind up meeting inside
    (does not work with Schwarzschild black holes), provided both
    black holes came out of particles that are each entangled with
    a particle the other black hole came out of.

    This was what I remember after having watched "The Quantum Origins
    of Gravity" (Oscar Klein Memorial Lecture 2018) by Leonard Susskind.


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn@PointedEars@web.de to sci.physics.relativity on Mon Mar 2 00:38:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Stefan Ram wrote:
    You can dive into a black hole and another person can dive
    into another black hole way off, and you wind up meeting inside

    [_Fall_, not "dive". "Dive" implies that you go below some surface, and
    that you can come back to that surface ;-)]

    Yes.

    (does not work with Schwarzschild black holes),

    False. The maximally extended Schwarzschild solution includes the
    possibility of another (perhaps mirror or parallel) universe. The
    respective Penrose diagram looks like this:

    time (e.g. the T-coordinate of Kruskal--Szekeres coordinates)
    ^
    : .-------------------. <-- singularity (r = 0)
    : `. .'
    : `. black .'<-- outer event horizon (r = R_S)
    : `. hole .'
    : `. .'
    : other `.' our universe
    : universe .' `.
    : .` `.
    : .' white `.
    : .' hole `.
    : ' `
    '---------------------------> space (e.g. the X-coordinate of K.--Sz.)

    If a person in our universe falls into a black hole, and a person in the
    other universe falls into the same black hole, then, in theory, both can
    meet inside, and can tell each other about their respective universes:

    time
    ^
    : .-------------------. <-- singularity (r = 0)
    : `. black hole .'
    : `. -. .- .'<-- outer event horizon (r = R_S)
    : `.': :`.'
    : .' `. .' `.
    : other `.' our universe
    : universe .' `.
    : .` `.
    : .' `.
    : .' `.
    : ' `
    '---------------------------> space

    Unfortunately, though, they cannot tell anyone else because (classically)
    still no information gets out the black hole (in a Penrose diagram, lines at
    an angle of +-45-# to the horizontal indicate lightlike geodesics, so the information would have to be faster than c to get out). And unless it is
    not actually a Schwarzschild black hole, both will die together at some
    point on their way falling together towards the singularity; at the latest
    at the singularity.

    [In fact, to learn of other universes inside a black hole is even
    possible without a second person. But you would still not be able
    to tell anyone about it if it is a Schwarzschild black hole.]

    See also:

    Thomas Lahn: General Relativity (public playlist)
    Veritasium: Something Strange Happens When You Follow Einstein's Math <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6akmv1bsz1M&list=PL41EYJuJ5YuDn3d13ryZwpzGBXewXa9AH&index=11>

    [The way the coordinate transformations from Schwarzschild to
    Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates etc. are demonstrated there by morphing the coordinate grid is just beautiful :)

    The video is quite good, but unfortunately it repeats the common
    misconception of "not even light can escape". While that is true in a
    sense, it does not have anything to do with that the "escape velocity" (actually: escape speed) would be c at the outer event horizon. See also Andrew J. S. Hamilton's "Inside Black Holes", <https://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/insidebh/index.html>, from which some of
    the Penrose diagrams in the video are taken, for details. See also the many references in the video description.]

    However, there is an interesting fact: When the person in our universe falls into the black hole, that increases its mass, which increases the radius of
    its event horizon, i.e. causes the black hole to grow; and that could
    *cause* the person in the other universe to fall into it as well (if their speed is not fast enough), or simply *be* in it, even *retroactively*:

    time
    ^
    : .-------------------. <-- singularity (r = 0)
    : `. black .'
    : `. hole .'<-- outer event horizon (r = R_S)
    : '-. .^'
    : person -->*. .' :
    : in other .'. *<-- person in
    : universe .' `. our universe
    : .` `.
    : .' `.
    :
    '---------------------------> space

    provided both black holes came out of particles that are each
    entangled with a particle the other black hole came out of.

    Nonsense, or at least highly speculative.

    This was what I remember after having watched "The Quantum Origins
    of Gravity" (Oscar Klein Memorial Lecture 2018) by Leonard Susskind.

    I suggest that you watch it again because you might misremember.
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity on Mon Mar 2 22:07:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Stefan Ram wrote:

    You can dive into a black hole and another person can dive
    into another black hole way off, and you wind up meeting inside
    (does not work with Schwarzschild black holes), provided both
    black holes came out of particles that are each entangled with
    a particle the other black hole came out of.

    This was what I remember after having watched "The Quantum Origins
    of Gravity" (Oscar Klein Memorial Lecture 2018) by Leonard Susskind.

    But science got it all backwards..

    if you take a shovel
    and dig a hole
    on the ground...
    you first have to
    take out the dirt...
    outwards, in order to
    make a hole.

    A black hole in space
    works by the same priciple.

    Things have to come out FIRST
    of a black hole in space...
    and really...nothing goes in.

    All this talk that nothin
    escapes a black hole is wrong.

    WHY do you think
    THEY showed you a photo
    of a black hole..and then
    they BLURRED IT ALL?

    Cause they don't want you
    to see the Truth.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4f/Black_hole_-_Messier_87_crop_max_res.jpg
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2