Den 17.12.2025 08:50, skrev Thomas Heger:
Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part
needed for a fast breeding reactor???
You didn't answer my question.
The "apparatus for producing refrigeration" is described in detail in
the patent application.
Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:
But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's
and Szillard's patent?
The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of
other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with
no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here:
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf
The refigerator is described in detail.
You only think they did, because Electrolux spent money.
But actually there are all sorts of reasons thinkable, why some company
would like to give somebody money and declare that as spending for patents.
So why do you think that Electrolux gave Einstein money?
the Einstine misundrestood the patent he "applied" for. He was busy with
his cosine, who was a man. It was allowed to be a man. A man to marry another man
Den 17.12.2025 08:50, skrev Thomas Heger:
Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:
Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Do you never read the posts you are responding to?
Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company
Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators.
In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought
an Electrolux absorption refrigerator.
I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges
based on Einstein and Szilard's patent.
No, because this is a 'non sequitur'.
Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux.
Sure!
But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were
based upon Einstein's patent?
My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared.
Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality?
This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'.
I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this
fridge was build according to Einstein's patent.
Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money.
But that's all we could safely assume.
Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but
wanted to keep that secret.
But how could we today possibly know????
So, we have a few facts:
Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge
Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money
Electrolux sold tons of fridges
... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent.
But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's and Szillard's patent?
The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of
other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with
no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here:
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf
The refrigerator is described in detail.
Why don't you read it and see for yourself? Can't you read?
No sane person can read a detailed descripion of a refrigerator
and believe that it is anything but a refrigerator.
Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part
needed for a fast breeding reactor???
You didn't answer my question.
The "apparatus for producing refrigeration" is described in detail
in the patent application.
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf
This isn't a scientific text you have to be a physicist to understand.
An engineer should be qualified to read it.
Why can't you read it an see for yourself what kind of apparatus its is?
We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein'spatent and check whether or not it cools.>
But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering
students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did
NOT cool.
Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast
breeding reactors.
SIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-D and ROFL
The endresult:
two points for fast breeding reactor
zero points for 'fridge'.
Can you point out where in the detailed description it
is clear that the apparatus is a part of a fast breeding reactor?
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf
The lines in the text are numbered, so it should be easy to refer to
the relevant section.
Den 17.12.2025 08:50, skrev Thomas Heger:
Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:
Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Do you never read the posts you are responding to?
Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company
Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators.
In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought
an Electrolux absorption refrigerator.
I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges
based on Einstein and Szilard's patent.
No, because this is a 'non sequitur'.
Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux.
Sure!
But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were
based upon Einstein's patent?
My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared.
Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality?
This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'.
I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this
fridge was build according to Einstein's patent.
Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money.
But that's all we could safely assume.
Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but
wanted to keep that secret.
But how could we today possibly know????
So, we have a few facts:
Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge
Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money
Electrolux sold tons of fridges
... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent.
But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's and Szillard's patent?
The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of
other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with
no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here:
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf
The refrigerator is described in detail.
Why don't you read it and see for yourself? Can't you read?
No sane person can read a detailed descripion of a refrigerator
and believe that it is anything but a refrigerator.
Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part
needed for a fast breeding reactor???
You didn't answer my question.
The "apparatus for producing refrigeration" is described in detail
in the patent application.
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf
This isn't a scientific text you have to be a physicist to understand.
An engineer should be qualified to read it.
Why can't you read it an see for yourself what kind of apparatus its is?
We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein'spatent and check whether or not it cools.>
But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering
students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did
NOT cool.
Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast
breeding reactors.
SIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-D and ROFL
The endresult:
two points for fast breeding reactor
zero points for 'fridge'.
Can you point out where in the detailed description it
is clear that the apparatus is a part of a fast breeding reactor?
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf
The lines in the text are numbered, so it should be easy to refer to
the relevant section
Einstein and Szillard patented a device, which is commonly called 'Einstein's fridge'.
The 'nym-shifting troll demonstrated their mindbogging stupidity once
again:
the Einstine misundrestood the patent he "applied" for. He was busy
with his cosine, who was a man. It was allowed to be a man. A man to
marry another man
*facepalm*
Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:
Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Do you never read the posts you are responding to?
Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company
Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators.
In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought
an Electrolux absorption refrigerator.
I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges
based on Einstein and Szilard's patent.
No, because this is a 'non sequitur'.
Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux.
Sure!
But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were
based upon Einstein's patent?
My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared.
Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality?
This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'.
I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this
fridge was build according to Einstein's patent.
Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money.
But that's all we could safely assume.
Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but >wanted to keep that secret.
But how could we today possibly know????
So, we have a few facts:
Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge
Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money
Electrolux sold tons of fridges
... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent.
THAT was actually the question.
Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part
needed for a fast breeding reactor????
We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein's
patent and check whether or not it cools.
But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering >students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did
NOT cool.
Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast >breeding reactors.
The endresult:
two points for fast breeding reactor
zero points for 'fridge'.
TH
...
On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 08:50:10 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:
Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:
Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Do you never read the posts you are responding to?
Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company
Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators.
In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought
an Electrolux absorption refrigerator.
I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges
based on Einstein and Szilard's patent.
No, because this is a 'non sequitur'.
Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux.
Sure!
But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were
based upon Einstein's patent?
My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared.
Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality?
This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'.
I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this
fridge was build according to Einstein's patent.
Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money.
But that's all we could safely assume.
Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but >>wanted to keep that secret.
But how could we today possibly know????
So, we have a few facts:
Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge
Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money
Electrolux sold tons of fridges
... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent.
THAT was actually the question.
Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part >>needed for a fast breeding reactor????
We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein's
patent and check whether or not it cools.
But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering >>students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did
NOT cool.
Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast >>breeding reactors.
The endresult:
two points for fast breeding reactor
zero points for 'fridge'.
TH
...
"common knowledge"??? that is lacking with these people...
"Never used in refrigerators, their pump was later adapted for the >circulation of coolants in the controversial fast-breeder nuclear
reactoruoan irony that would not have been lost on either Einstein or >Szilard.o (Bernard Feld, Einstein and Nuclear Weapons, Holton and
Elkana, p. 391.)"
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (1 / 5) |
| Uptime: | 22:46:59 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
6 files (8,794K bytes) |
| Messages: | 186,546 |
| Posted today: | 1 |