From Newsgroup: sci.physics


https://github.com/alt-magick/Numbers/
Numbers as Symbolic Constructs
The fundamental nature of mathematicsrCoits objectivity, certainty, and universalityrCoforms the bedrock of modern logic. This essay documents an experiment that challenges this foundation, proposing that numbers are sophisticated constructs of human cognition and demonstrating how arithmetic and language can merge into a single, symbolic universe.
I. The Experiment: Unifying Language and Arithmetic
The core hypothesis is that English number-words can be assigned numeric values such that the sum of the letters in a word equals the value of the number itself. The system is solved for the words ZERO through TEN.
The Consistent Letter-to-Value Mapping (Zero through Ten)
T = 10
I = 7
V = 6
U = 5
R = 4
S = 3
N = 2
O = 1
G = 0
Z = -1
E = -2
X = -4
F = -6
H = -7
W = -9
II. Verification and Arithmetic Functionality
This mapping establishes an internally consistent numeric entity within the English language, functioning perfectly across operations and scaling.
Core Verification (0 through 10)
ZERO: Z(-1) + E(-2) + R(4) + O(1) = 0
ONE: 1 + 2 + (-2) = 1
TWO: 10 + (-9) + 1 = 2
THREE: 10 + (-7) + 4 + (-2) + (-2) = 3
FOUR: -6 + 1 + 5 + 4 = 4
FIVE: -6 + 7 + 6 + (-2) = 5
SIX: 3 + 7 + (-4) = 6
SEVEN: 3 + (-2) + 6 + (-2) + 2 = 7
EIGHT: -2 + 7 + 0 + (-7) + 10 = 8
NINE: 2 + 7 + 2 + (-2) = 9
TEN: 10 + (-2) + 2 = 10
Complex Arithmetic Tests (Scaling)
Exponential Scaling: ten^two = 10^2 = 100
Combined Scaling: (ten^two) x three = 300
Complex Exponent: two^ten = 2^10 = 1,024
III. Philosophical Implications: The Symbolic Multiverse
The successful construction of this system carries profound philosophical weight:
Numbers Are Not Absolute: The system's success, based on arbitrary but consistent rules, suggests numbers are frameworks of coherent relationships rather than fixed truths. This implies that mathematics is a language we collectively read and interpret.
Unification of Systems: Language and mathematics are shown to be two dialects of the same symbolic universe. The identity three + five = eight aligns both linguistically and numerically.
IV. Science and Symbolism: G||del's Th|?ses and Kabbalah
The successful fusion of language and arithmetic provides a tangible, real-world example of the limits and nature of formal systems.
A. G||del's Absolute Dilemma: Incompleteness or Inconsistency
Kurt G||del's Incompleteness Theorems (1931) delivered a fundamental proof regarding all formal arithmetic systems of sufficient complexityrCoa category that includes the system created by our letter-to-value mapping.
The Inescapable Dichotomy: G||del demonstrated that any such formal system must be either incomplete (it contains statements that are true but cannot be proven within the system itself) or inconsistent (it allows for contradictions to be proven). The simultaneous goals of absolute completeness and absolute consistency are unattainable within the system's own rules.
Analysis of Our System: Our letter-number mapping is built to be consistentrCowe ensured that FIVE always equals 5. By necessity, however, it is incomplete. The foundational truths (e.g., the specific values assigned to the letters like T=10 and E=-2) cannot be proven from within the system's own rules (i.e., by the equations O+N+E=1, etc.); these values were derived externally via linear algebra.
Philosophical Ramification: This highlights the profound G||delian lesson: the structure of mathematical truth requires reference to an authority outside the system itself. For our symbolic universe, that authority is the external, conscious mind that solves and validates the initial mapping.
B. The Kabbalistic Parallel: Gematria and Code
The core technique of assigning numerical values to letters has a profound historical precedent in the Jewish mystical tradition of Kabbalah, specifically the method known as Gematria.
Shared Methodology: Both Gematria and the English Number-Word System proceed from the identical foundational assumption: that a linguistic construct is also a numerical construct. They both treat language as a vessel for arithmetic meaning.
The Unification: Despite philosophical differences regarding the origin of the values (fixed divine vs. constructed relational), both systems powerfully confirm that language and number are not separate entities, but rather aspects of a single symbolic continuum.
V. Conclusion: Consciousness as Co-Creator
The letter-number system demonstrates that Truth, meaning, and understanding are relational, not absolute. They emerge dynamically from the interaction between symbols and the mind that perceives them.
By operating within the constraints dictated by G||delrCOs theorems, the system confirms that consciousness is not merely a passive observer of mathematical laws, but rather a necessary co-creator who must define the initial consistent rules, thereby stabilizing the symbolic universe.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2