• AI most hated by formal verification (Re: Fuzzy Alert: Boris the Loris on the Dancefloor)

    From Mild Shock@janburse@fastmail.fm to sci.physics on Wed Nov 26 17:03:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics

    Hi,

    So Boris the Loris and Nazi Retartd Julio are
    not alone. There is now a mobilization of the
    kind of rage against the machine,

    fighting for methods without randomness. Its
    almost like Albert Einstein ascendet from his
    grave and is now preaching,

    "God does not play dice"

    So how it started:

    PIVOT was an interactive program verifier designed by
    L. Peter Deutsch for his Ph.D. dissertation.
    Posted here by permission of L. Peter Deutsch. https://softwarepreservation.computerhistory.org/pivot/

    How its going:

    Formal Methods: Whence and Whither?
    The text also highlights the evolving role of formal
    methods amidst technological advancements, such as
    AI, and explores educational and standardization issues
    related to their adoption. https://de.slideshare.net/slideshow/formal-methods-whence-and-whither-keynote/273708245

    Can the Don Quijotes win, and fight the AI windmills?

    LoL

    Bye

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    Boris the Loris and Julio Di Egidio the Nazi Retard,
    are going for an afterwork beer. They are still
    highly confused by Fuzzy Testing:

    Star Trek - The 70's Disco Generation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=505zvAvnreg

    The favorite hangout is Spock's Logic Dancefloor,
    which is known for its sharp unfuzzy wit. They
    have-a a chat with Data about Disco Math,

    the only Math which has no Fuzzy Logic in it.

    Bye

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    Candidate Recommendation Draft - 30 September 2025
    https://www.w3.org/TR/webnn

    WebNN samples by Ningxin Hu, Intel, Shanghai
    https://github.com/webmachinelearning/webnn-samples

    Bye

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    It seems I am having problems pacing with
    all the new fancy toys. Wasn't able to really
    benchmark my NPU from a Desktop AI machine,

    picked the wrong driver. Need to try again.
    What worked was benchmarking Mobile AI machines.
    I just grabbed Geekbench AI and some devices:

    USA Fab, M4:

    -a-a-a-a sANN-a-a-a hANN-a-a-a qANN
    iPad CPU-a-a-a 4848-a-a-a 7947-a-a-a 6353
    iPad GPU-a-a-a 9752-a-a-a 11383-a-a-a 10051
    iPad NPU-a-a-a 4873-a-a-a 36544-a-a-a *51634*

    China Fab, Snapdragon:

    -a-a-a-a sANN-a-a-a hANN-a-a-a qANN
    Redmi CPU-a-a-a 1044-a-a-a 950-a-a-a 1723
    Redmi GPU-a-a-a 480-a-a-a 905-a-a-a 737
    Redmi NNAPI-a-a-a 205-a-a-a 205-a-a-a 469
    Redmi QNN-a-a-a 226-a-a-a 226-a-a-a *10221*

    Speed-Up via NPU is factor 10x. See the column
    qANN which means quantizised artificial neural
    networks, when NPU or QNN is picked.

    The mobile AI NPUs are optimized using
    mimimal amounts of energy, and minimal amounts
    of space squeezing (distilling) everything

    into INT8 and INT4.

    Bye



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2