From Newsgroup: sci.physics


Your real name isn't "Dawn" so you don't actually have to worry
about anyone rolling you in flour & looking for the wet spot...

Okay, so I cited the Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement
experiment as an example of what people are calling
Retrocausality.

And...

And I pointed out how there's another view. That, from the
perspective of a photon time doesn't even exist, so there is
no Retrocausality.

But...

But according to Einstein, *Both* perspectives are correct!

We are correct in that we are witnessing Retrocausality. From
the perspective of the photon though, the correct observation
is no Retrocausality.

"Time is relative."
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On 11/3/2025 12:18 PM, JTEM wrote:

Your real name isn't "Dawn" so you don't actually have to worry
about anyone rolling you in flour & looking for the wet spot...

Okay, so I cited the Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement
experiment as an example of what people are calling
Retrocausality.

And...

And I pointed out how there's another view. That, from the
perspective of a photon time doesn't even exist, so there is
no Retrocausality.

But...

But according to Einstein, *Both* perspectives are correct!

We are correct in that we are witnessing Retrocausality. From
the perspective of the photon though, the correct observation
is no Retrocausality.

"Time is relative."

Feel better now??
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On 11/3/25 6:28 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Feel better now??

Why do you hit reply when you have nothing to say?

The best way to avoid looking like you, um, looking
like an idiot is to NOT say something when you have
nothing to say.

Anyway, according to Einstein our observations, our
perspective is correct. So Retrocausality is real.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:18:07 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

Your real name isn't "Dawn" so you don't actually have to worry

That may be her real name. We can't actually know. We can KNOW
your real name is not JTEM. It's John.
No, I will not post the rest of what I was sent regarding you.
Well, ok. "Watch This."
Don't freak out. I have no idea how much, if anything, I was sent
is really about you. I can't be bothered to try to find out.

[...]

"Time is relative."

I recall Richard O'Brien, as Riff Raff, saying, "Time is
fleeting." :)
--
Kenito Benito
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 22:42:09 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

The best way to avoid looking like you, um, looking
like an idiot is to NOT say something when you have
nothing to say.

A better description of your posts I've yet to see.
Now divert from your self spank. You will because I command you
to do so.
--
Kenito Benito
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

Kenito Benito wrote:

On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:18:07 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

Your real name isn't "Dawn" so you don't actually have to worry

That may be her real name. We can't actually know. We can KNOW
your real name is not JTEM. It's John.
No, I will not post the rest of what I was sent regarding you.
Well, ok. "Watch This."
Don't freak out. I have no idea how much, if anything, I was sent
is really about you. I can't be bothered to try to find out.

[...]

"Time is relative."

I recall Richard O'Brien, as Riff Raff, saying, "Time is
fleeting." :)

you get mails from usenet people?

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On 11/6/25 11:18 AM, jojo wrote:

you get mails from usenet people?

One of the hidden benefits of a D.I.D. system, I suppose.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

JTEM wrote:

On 11/6/25 11:18 AM, jojo wrote:

you get mails from usenet people?

One of the hidden benefits of a D.I.D. system, I suppose.

i am not familiar with that system.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On 11/6/25 4:15 PM, jojo wrote:

JTEM wrote:

On 11/6/25 11:18 AM, jojo wrote:

you get mails from usenet people?

One of the hidden benefits of a D.I.D. system, I suppose.

i am not familiar with that system.

D.I.D. used to be known as a "Multiple Personality Disorder."

A "D.I.D. system" would be all the various alters.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 16:18:59 +0000, jojo <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:

Kenito Benito wrote:

On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:18:07 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

Your real name isn't "Dawn" so you don't actually have to worry

That may be her real name. We can't actually know. We can KNOW
your real name is not JTEM. It's John.
No, I will not post the rest of what I was sent regarding you.
Well, ok. "Watch This."
Don't freak out. I have no idea how much, if anything, I was sent
is really about you. I can't be bothered to try to find out.

[...]

"Time is relative."

I recall Richard O'Brien, as Riff Raff, saying, "Time is
fleeting." :)

you get mails from usenet people?

Some. But it wasn't JTEM who sent me the information. He doesn't
have a valid E-mail for me. So it's someone who has known of me for a
while.
--
Kenito Benito
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:54:15 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

On 11/6/25 11:18 AM, jojo wrote:

you get mails from usenet people?

One of the hidden benefits of a D.I.D. system, I suppose.

You have Dissociative Identity Disorder? Suddenly your posts make
much more sense.
--
Kenito Benito
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 21:15:31 +0000, jojo <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:

JTEM wrote:

On 11/6/25 11:18 AM, jojo wrote:

you get mails from usenet people?

One of the hidden benefits of a D.I.D. system, I suppose.

i am not familiar with that system.

John, if that is his real name, is telling the readers he has
Dissociative Identity Disorder.
--
Kenito Benito
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:54:15 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

On 11/6/25 11:18 AM, jojo wrote:

you get mails from usenet people?

One of the hidden benefits of a D.I.D. system, I suppose.

You have Dissociative Identity Disorder? Suddenly your posts make
much more sense.
--
Kenito Benito
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

JTEM wrote:

Your real name isn't "Dawn" so you don't actually have to worry
about anyone rolling you in flour & looking for the wet spot...

Speaking of real names: What is yours?

Okay, so I cited the Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement
experiment as an example of what people are calling
Retrocausality.

It is impossible to know to what citation you are referring as your message appears to be broken as it does not contain a References header field.

However, know that the (outcome of the) Delayed Choice Quantum _Eraser_ experiment is frequently misinterpreted even by some physicists. There is actually no retrocausality.

One example of a clarification comes from Sean Carroll (who does research in string theory):

https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2019/09/21/the-notorious-delayed-choice-quantum-eraser

HTH.

F'up2 sci.physics
--
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 15:28:11 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

JTEM wrote:

Your real name isn't "Dawn" so you don't actually have to worry
about anyone rolling you in flour & looking for the wet spot...

Speaking of real names: What is yours?

It's been reported it's John.

Okay, so I cited the Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement
experiment as an example of what people are calling
Retrocausality.

It is impossible to know to what citation you are referring as your message >appears to be broken as it does not contain a References header field.

However, know that the (outcome of the) Delayed Choice Quantum _Eraser_ >experiment is frequently misinterpreted even by some physicists. There is >actually no retrocausality.

One example of a clarification comes from Sean Carroll (who does research in >string theory):

https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2019/09/21/the-notorious-delayed-choice-quantum-eraser

HTH.

F'up2 sci.physics

John doesn't want to be right. He wants people to agree with him.
He is consistently proved wrong. He removes that which proves him
wrong when he replies and goes on to use ad homs.
I don't KNOW John's age range, but he did once claim he's not 10
years old yet. He may have been lying. But his posts are consistent
with the maturity level of seven to nine year olds. So it is certainly possible.
--
Kenito Benito
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On 11/23/2025 8:28 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

JTEM wrote:

Your real name isn't "Dawn" so you don't actually have to worry
about anyone rolling you in flour & looking for the wet spot...

Speaking of real names: What is yours?

Okay, so I cited the Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement
experiment as an example of what people are calling
Retrocausality.

It is impossible to know to what citation you are referring as your message appears to be broken as it does not contain a References header field.

However, know that the (outcome of the) Delayed Choice Quantum _Eraser_ experiment is frequently misinterpreted even by some physicists. There is actually no retrocausality.

One example of a clarification comes from Sean Carroll (who does research in string theory):

https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2019/09/21/the-notorious-delayed-choice-quantum-eraser

HTH.

F'up2 sci.physics

Thank you for posting Professor Carroll's blog post. Such is a gentle reminder that Quantum Field Theory is really, really hard!!

Dawn
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

Kenito Benito wrote:

On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 15:28:11 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

F'up2 sci.physics

i have sci physics in my subscribed list, but havent checked it
almost since i added it.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On 11/23/25 09:56, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 11/23/2025 8:28 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

JTEM wrote:

Your real name isn't "Dawn" so you don't actually have to worry
about anyone rolling you in flour & looking for the wet spot...

Speaking of real names: What is yours?

Okay, so I cited the Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement
experiment as an example of what people are calling
Retrocausality.

It is impossible to know to what citation you are referring as your
message
appears to be broken as it does not contain a References header field.

However, know that the (outcome of the) Delayed Choice Quantum _Eraser_
experiment is frequently misinterpreted even by some physicists.
There is
actually no retrocausality.

One example of a clarification comes from Sean Carroll (who does
research in
string theory):

https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2019/09/21/the-notorious-delayed-choice-quantum-eraser

HTH.

F'up2 sci.physics

Thank you for posting Professor Carroll's blog post.-a Such is a gentle reminder that Quantum Field Theory is really, really hard!!

Dawn

The basic problem with what is sometimes called 'Quantum Field
Theory' is that in mathematics there are coherent terms called
'point and curve' and those are different from the ill defined
gibberish called 'particle and wave'. The term 'particle' makes
people imagine magically created and destroyed marbles. There
is no evidence that momentum or energy is transferred until a
waveform collapses. If you stop imagining appearing and
disappearing marbles an interference pattern makes sense
from the two slit experiment.

This is all derived from the ill defined term 'particle' which
tends to make people think of magically appearing and disappearing
marbles at time and distance scales where those macroscopic
objects are questionable representations of what actually happens.


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2