• Re: THE ONLY REAL counter to Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser

    From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,sci.physics,alt.conspiracy on Wed Dec 17 20:30:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics

    On 10/28/25 2:30 PM, JTEM wrote:

    REMEMBER EVERYTHING YOU'VE BEEN TAUGHT!!!!


    Time doesn't exist for a photon. it's essentially everywhere
    in the universe, or everywhere it can potentially reach,
    because time isn't a factor. Ever. Space isn't a factor.
    There's no traveling between two points -- there's no time
    for it to travel -- so it reaches everywhere... it's already
    there!

    Okay, so entangled photons aren't in different places, not
    from the perspective of the photon. And they aren't in
    different time intervals either. It's always the same place
    and the same time for both of them.

    Okay, from THIS point of view, based on everything you have
    always been taught about physics, no information is traveling
    through time FOR THE PHOTONS. Only us. From our perspective
    it is, information is traveling backwards through time but,
    from the perspective of the photon it isn't.

    Wow. It's almost as if time is relative!

    Travel close to the speed of light and time will move very
    differently for you than for me. You always knew this. Time
    is not uniform for everyone and everything across the universe.

    So this is the explanation for the Delayed Choice Quantum
    Eraser experiment that doesn't require any backwards time
    travel. It's the only real counter to Retrocausality.

    There's but three people on this earth who can claim to
    understand time, and I'm pretty sure at least two of them are
    lying.


    i kinda came to this conclusion myself around 8 years ago watching pbs spacetime videos, eh?

    no idea how to further prove or do anything with it tho, so it's just
    been on the back burner while i pursue other ideas i kinda know what to
    do with
    --
    a burnt out swe investigating into why our tooling doesn't involve
    basic semantic proofs like total halting analysis

    please excuse my pseudo-pyscript,

    ~ nick
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2