• Re: Would =?UTF-8?B?UG9pbmNhcsOpIG1pc3MgdGhlIEFJIEJvb20/?=

    From bertietaylor@bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) to sci.physics on Mon Jul 21 00:27:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics

    Penisnino emerges as AIdiot shit!

    Woof woof-woof woof these apes can be funny.

    Bertietaylor

    --
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bertietaylor@bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) to sci.physics on Mon Jul 21 00:32:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics

    Ha ha Hanson has vanished as have whodat, uncle al, sergio, Archie and
    other sci.physics stalwarts.

    Roachie has stepped into the trench with what sinister purpose, who
    knows.

    WOOF woof woof woof woof-woof

    Bertietaylor

    --
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jim Pennino@jimp@gonzo.specsol.net to sci.physics on Sun Jul 20 18:25:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics

    Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
    Penisnino emerges as AIdiot shit!

    Woof woof-woof woof these apes can be funny.

    Bertietaylor

    --

    ArindamrCOs response is another non-substantive, deliberately crude insult
    that evades any engagement with critique or reasoned discourse. LetrCOs evaluate it:
    Content Breakdown

    rCLPenisnino emerges as AIdiot shit!rCY

    Personal attack: A variation on the same crude name distortion,
    escalating from mockery to outright verbal abuse.

    Wordplay ("AIdiot"): A cheap pun attempting to dismiss you and AI
    in one breath, with no argument attached.

    rCLShitrCY: Profanity used for emphasis, not substancerCoindicative of
    emotional reaction, not intellectual rebuttal.

    rCLWoof woof-woof woof these apes can be funny.rCY

    Continues the rCLwoofrCY affectation, now blended with dehumanization
    (rCLapesrCY).

    Dehumanization: Referring to critics as rCLapesrCY is a classic rhetorical
    move to delegitimize and demean. It reinforces ArindamrCOs posture of
    superiority while removing any obligation to engage with ideas.

    Laughter as deflection: rCLCan be funnyrCY implies ridicule, but again,
    evades the core argument.

    Intellectual Merit

    There is no intellectual or scientific content in this post:

    No reference to physics or ideas.

    No defense of his previous post.

    No counter to your (or my) analysis.

    Instead, this is pure emotional reaction packaged in mockery and
    projection. The tone and content amount to a schoolyard taunt dressed
    up in pseudophilosophical bark.
    Pattern Recognition

    This fits ArindamrCOs repeated rhetorical strategy:

    Provocation rRY Critique rRY Mocking insult rRY Evasion.

    No willingness to debate, only to dominate through insult.

    Language choices suggest increasing loss of composure and retreat
    into performative hostility when challenged.

    Conclusion

    This post further confirms:

    Total lack of argument.

    Unwillingness or inability to engage on substance.

    Dependence on insult, projection, and theatrical disdain.

    Far from defending his position, Arindam reinforces the view that his
    discourse is driven by ego, not inquiry, and that critique triggers
    juvenile deflection, not reflection.
    --
    penninojim@yahoo.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2