• Re: Lies of relativistic scum have short legs

    From Joda Christakos@idd@aschsas.gr to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Fri Feb 27 17:23:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    Den 26.02.2026 08:42, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:
    On 11/2/2025 12:27 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    The orbital time of a GPS satellite is half a sidereal day,
    or 43082.04525 UTC seconds (measured on the geoid).

    The orbital time of a GPS satellite measured by a clock in the
    satellite is 43082.04525(1 + 4.4647e-10) SI seconds.
    Quite correct!

    This measurement confirms the prediction of GR.

    Thanks for reminding us!

    you may thank all you want, since is wrong. That's a combination of both
    SR and GR, one of which is subtracted. Try again. Better luck next time
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn@PointedEars@web.de to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Fri Feb 27 21:41:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    The 'nym-shifting troll trolled as "Joda Christakos":
    Paul B. Andersen wrote:
    Den 26.02.2026 08:42, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:
    On 11/2/2025 12:27 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    The orbital time of a GPS satellite is half a sidereal day,
    or 43082.04525 UTC seconds (measured on the geoid).

    The orbital time of a GPS satellite measured by a clock in the
    satellite is 43082.04525(1 + 4.4647e-10) SI seconds.
    Quite correct!

    This measurement confirms the prediction of GR.

    Thanks for reminding us!

    you may thank all you want, since is wrong. That's a combination of both
    SR and GR, one of which is subtracted.

    This is an approximation that works for small masses, but it does not give
    the exact result. General relativity is not some addition to special relativity, it is a *generalization* of the former to a curved and dynamic a spacetime.

    Both the so-called "special-relativistic" and "general-relativistic" contribution can be derived from the Schwarzschild metric assuming different conditions.
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Toney Guckenberger@ggy@nktbyt.us to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Fri Feb 27 21:37:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    cretinoid it-supporter Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn illucid once again:

    The 'nym-shifting troll trolled as "Joda Christakos":
    Paul B. Andersen wrote:
    Den 26.02.2026 08:42, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:
    On 11/2/2025 12:27 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    The orbital time of a GPS satellite is half a sidereal day, or
    43082.04525 UTC seconds (measured on the geoid).

    The orbital time of a GPS satellite measured by a clock in the
    satellite is 43082.04525(1 + 4.4647e-10) SI seconds.
    Quite correct!

    This measurement confirms the prediction of GR.

    Thanks for reminding us!

    you may thank all you want, since is wrong. That's a combination of
    both SR and GR, one of which is subtracted.

    This is an approximation that works for small masses, but it does not
    give the exact result. General relativity is not some addition to
    special relativity, it is a *generalization* of the former to a curved
    and dynamic a spacetime.

    get yourself an education before opening your shitty mouth, it's the SR effects subtracted not the other way around. Piss off, you are
    insignificant, a waste of time and incapable to learn around here.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Barbaro Dovlatov@adar@ooaob.ru to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Sun Mar 1 17:18:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Python wrote:

    Le 01/03/2026 |a 13:42, "Paul B. Andersen" a |-crit :
    https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf See 1.2.2.

    So now you know what "coordinate time" is, and understand why a clock
    in GPS orbit has to be adjusted down by the factor (1-4.4647e-10)
    to stay in sync with UTC.
    Right? :-D

    You are very optimistic in assuming Wozniak could learn anything.

    You are not charitable also, but he doesn't deserve that anyway. I tried
    once to teach him SQL, in vain.

    yet another unemployed it-supporter, indeed, making it clearer.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2