Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 27 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 37:59:45 |
Calls: | 631 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 1,187 |
D/L today: |
22 files (29,767K bytes) |
Messages: | 173,681 |
Today, by contrast, is "Queen's Birthday" in Thailand -- actual birthday
of the actual reigning Queen ("former air hostess"),
On 2025-06-03, Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
Today, by contrast, is "Queen's Birthday" in Thailand -- actual birthday
of the actual reigning Queen ("former air hostess"),
Hmm. So a "reigning queen" is not a "queen regnant"?
[...] Monarchs, then, can have spouses who do not reign. Could two people be co-regnant? Wiliam III and Mary II, apparently, were co-monarchs (1689-1694). I can't remember how that was worked out, though we heard about it in high school. Or how William got to be "William III and II", as I just read somewhere.