• Re: Miraculous button makes things work again.

    From Ed P@esp@snet.xxx to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sat Feb 1 00:27:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On 1/31/2025 11:58 PM, micky wrote:
    In sci.electronics.repair, on Fri, 31 Jan 2025 16:24:16 -0800, john
    larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:



    HP sells printers cheap with half-filled cartriges, and charges as
    much as a new printer for a new set, which don't last long. If their
    printers came with full cartriges, people would throw away the printer
    when it ran out of toner.

    Our Brother B-size inkjet printer/copier/scanner is great, and ink
    refills are cheap. We do B-size schematics. They have a giant black
    cartrige too; we mostly use black.

    What does B-size mean? Is it bigger than 8 1/2 x 14?

    What are the Brother design defects?


    11 x 17 Often used fro engineering drawings
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Liebermann@jeffl@cruzio.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Fri Jan 31 22:02:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 16:24:16 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    What are the Brother design defects?

    Brother MFC-L2740DW printer: <https://www.google.com/search?q=brother%20mfc%20L2740dw&udm=2>
    The problem appears on many similar Brother laser printers.

    If the owner pulls out the paper tray while it's printing, the printer
    does not stop printing. Instead, it cracks the tiny feed gear. I
    have some photos I took of the damage and subsequent repair, but I
    can't find them right now.

    In the front center of the paper tray, there is a translucent roller
    that is part of the paper feed mechanism. Static electricity causes
    this roller to be packed with paper dust and eventually stop turning,
    causing a paper jam or other paper feed failure. The paper dust hides
    UNDER the translucent roller and is easily cleaned out if you can
    figure out how it's done. I can take a few photos showing how if you
    want them.

    Near the translucent roller in the paper tray is a friction pap. The
    pad and the feed roller above its position in the paper tray tend to
    develop a smooth polish. The loss of friction causes feed failures.
    Brother's idea of repair parts are toner carts and drums: <https://www.brother-usa.com/supplies-and-accessories-search-result#q=MFC-L2740dw>
    A trick the works on some printers is to remove the rubber roller or
    pad, flip it over, and reinstall it. Fortunately, 3rd party vendors
    carry suck parts.

    The paper stop near the back of the paper tray is fragile. Push too
    hard inserting a stack of paper and it will break. This should work
    as a replacement: <https://www.parts-distribution.com/collections/brother/products/new-oem-brother-250-page-rear-paper-guide-for-mfcl2700dw-mfc-l2700dw>

    The main PCB in the printer uses a super capacitor instead of the
    usual lithium coin cell to provide power to the circuitry that stores
    the printer settings. When it fails, printer won't turn on. Replacing
    the super capacitor involves disassembly and soldering. YouTube video
    on how to replace the super cap:
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgkHv1c01tQ> <https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Brother+MFC-J4420DW+Capacitor+Replacement/74271> The caps are 5.5VDC 0.22Farads. <https://www.google.com/search?q=KR-5r5V224-R>

    That should be enough for now...
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cursitor Doom@cd@notformail.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sat Feb 1 13:32:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 21:19:24 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:23:06 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> >>wrote:

    On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:09:22 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>wrote:

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:41:08 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> >>>>wrote:

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:38:40 -0800, Bob F >>>>><bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper >>>>>>clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers, >>>>>One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing. >>>>>I wonder how it decides when to break?

    Several ways to determine when to self-destruct:

    1. Warranty timer. The timer records how many elapsed days between >>>>when power was first applied and the current date. When the timer >>>>shows 110% of the warranty period, it declares a fault or failure. The >>>>extra 10% is to deal with errors in the timer.

    2. Predicted use. The "chip" in many inkjet printer cartridges is a >>>>good example. The manufacturer decrees that the inkjet cartridge >>>>should last 1,000 pages. When the chip counts 1,001 printed pages, it >>>>ceases printing and produces a difficult to decode error message. It's >>>>much the same with laser toner carts and drums. With older iPhone >>>>batteries, the clock was slowed down to simulate the effects of an >>>>aging battery.

    Don't buy HP printers. They are in the theft business.

    Brother is a much better deal, both laser and inkjet.


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are
    why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots> ><https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007) ><https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html>

    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I
    had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the
    transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not >recommended.

    Thanks, Jeff. You're a mine of useful information as ever.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sat Feb 1 11:29:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:02:09 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> wrote:

    With email copy to Ed. Remove NONONO to email.

    The "Ed" referred to here wrote me in reply,
    "Yeah, depending on which of a few thousand engineering shops designed
    the DVDR, there could be some Reset Button hidden in the middle of
    nowhere that brings it back to life

    by possibly deleting a bloated task-log/calendar that was not given
    enough memory/disc-space for the unforeseen service life of ~15 years."

    I don't think that would apply to my DVDR, since afaik there is no
    reason for it to keep a log. What do you all think?

    But at least in some cases, the switch would be curing a real problem.
    Of course they could arrange for the display, instead of saying play or
    rewiund to see "E3, see manual" and if there is no room for that, or
    they forgot to code it, they could just put it in the printed owners
    manual. Still, it molifies me a tiny bit that there could be a real
    problem that the switch cures.

    I posted in another thread about my philips DVDR3575H dvdr with
    harddrive that stopped working 2 or 3 months ago. (I've had medical
    problems since Dec 11, so I've not gotten much done. They are scheduled
    to end or be permanent by March 11. I'm optimistic.)

    But I did buy another identical dvdr from ebay for 180 dollars (they had
    much cheaper, but the first one lasted me 15 years, and even though the
    one I just bought is also already 15 years old, I still think it will
    last 15 years. See, I'm optimistic.) And he was the only one who
    showed a tv with a picture on it in his photos.

    I put it in and it worked fine for 2 of the 3 tv's I'm using now, but
    one 14" crt tv has much more static when text or commercials come on the >screen than it did before. That is another topic. Anyone have any
    ideas? I'll post details if you do.

    The topic here is what happened when I took apart the broken one. Since
    it was totally dead, I expected to find a problem with the power supply.
    I didnt' see anything burned out, and before I got out my meter, I
    looked around and in the middle of another board, iirc the tuner board,
    I found a little switch that looks like the middle ones in the back row
    here: >https://www.google.com/imgres?q=mini%20push%20button%20switch&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FMTYwMFgxNjAw%2Fz%2F~CQAAOSwg-NiIKR4%2F%24_57.JPG%3Fset_id%3D8800005007&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fitm%2F402506084854&docid=lTwHaPMd2PG4uM&tbnid=IkOz4CNcM5iAZM&vet=12ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA..i&w=1600&h=1600&hcb=2&ved=2ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA
    The little black sticks sticking up in the middle are made of plastic or >rubber, so like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland, I
    pushed it down. And the DVDR started working again!!!

    How come they don't mention this in the owners manual for my model, and
    I found a service manual for a similar DVDR that doesn't say a word
    about it either. The switch is labeled Reset
    Sw.50
    I can post the urls for the manuals if you want.

    I haven't connected the output yet because I'd have to connect a RF >modulator, but it shows On, Play, Rewind, none of which it did before.
    I'm 95% convinced it works as good as before. Unless it fails again?
    Likely? Why do they have this button if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sat Feb 1 21:06:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are
    why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:

    Are they still doing this? :-o

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots> <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007) <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html>

    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I
    had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the
    transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not recommended.

    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find anything.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Liebermann@jeffl@cruzio.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sat Feb 1 14:02:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are
    why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:

    Are they still doing this? :-o

    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web
    sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html>

    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I
    had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the
    transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not
    recommended.

    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >anything.

    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was
    looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots
    require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sat Feb 1 17:34:01 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff
    Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:


    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer.

    I have days like that too. As long as it's not weeks, I'm not too
    worried.


    Yellow dots
    require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From danny burstein@dannyb@panix.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sat Feb 1 22:48:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    [lots snipped]

    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >>looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer.

    I have days like that too. As long as it's not weeks, I'm not too
    worried.

    here's an old series of articles by the kind folk at EFF
    describing the issue.

    https://www.eff.org/issues/printers
    --
    _____________________________________________________
    Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
    dannyb@panix.com
    [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Liebermann@jeffl@cruzio.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sat Feb 1 15:29:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are
    why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:

    Are they still doing this? :-o

    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web
    sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html>

    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I
    had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the
    transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not
    recommended.

    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >>anything.

    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots
    require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.

    I found the yellow dots, but it wasn't easy. As usual, I did
    everything wrong the first time I tried it.

    1. Use a magnifier. I found that a folding jewelers 30x loupe, with
    a built in white LED, worked well. This what I used: <https://www.ebay.com/itm/116331398465>
    Both loupes were low quality, but the price was right. The UV light
    didn't do anything useful. I could try using one of my microscopes,
    but the kitchen table is currently occupied.

    2. Don't use paper with a rough or textured (linen, felt, laid, etc)
    surface. Try to find paper with a smooth surface. If it looks like
    the surface of the moon with a magnifier, find some other paper.

    3. Some articles suggest using UV illumination. I have a wide
    variety of UV lights in both LED and fluorescent in various
    wavelengths. However, yellow toner is not phosphorescent, so it must
    be the phosphors they add to paper to make them appear "bright". Sure
    enough, UV illumination worked best with 96 bright paper. I didn't
    have any 100 bright. However, UV illumination didn't improve
    visibility much.

    4. The tiny dots seem unevenly spread over the surface of the paper.
    You'll need to move the magnifying glass around the page to find the
    yellow dots. At 30x the depth of field is small. That means put the
    printed page on something flat.

    5. When I first started looking for the dots, I almost instantly saw
    them. About 1 minute later, the dots disappeared. What happened is
    that I had cataract surgery about 1 year ago. The problem was that it
    wasn't totally successful. As soon as I was able to rest my eyes a
    little, the dots re-appeared.

    6. I guessed that the designers did not include a feature where the
    dots moved around the page after each printed page. Therefore,
    over-printing the same page multiple times should improve visibility. Unfortunately, my laser printer has a registration problem causing the overprinted dots and text on the page to move. However, I have more
    dots to view. I found more barely visible yellow dots, but also a few
    very bright yellow dots.

    It's my understanding that the yellow dots also appear when "printing"
    to a file. I suspect that printing on dark paper will improve the
    contrast and make the yellow dots more visible. I would guess(tm)
    that a yellow filter might also help improve contrast. I haven't
    tried any of these (yet).

    Good luck.
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From john larkin@JL@gct.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sat Feb 1 15:45:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:29:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are
    why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:

    Are they still doing this? :-o

    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web >>sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html>

    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I >>>> had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the
    transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not
    recommended.

    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >>>anything.

    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >>looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots >>require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.

    I found the yellow dots, but it wasn't easy. As usual, I did
    everything wrong the first time I tried it.

    1. Use a magnifier. I found that a folding jewelers 30x loupe, with
    a built in white LED, worked well. This what I used: ><https://www.ebay.com/itm/116331398465>
    Both loupes were low quality, but the price was right. The UV light
    didn't do anything useful. I could try using one of my microscopes,
    but the kitchen table is currently occupied.

    2. Don't use paper with a rough or textured (linen, felt, laid, etc) >surface. Try to find paper with a smooth surface. If it looks like
    the surface of the moon with a magnifier, find some other paper.

    3. Some articles suggest using UV illumination. I have a wide
    variety of UV lights in both LED and fluorescent in various
    wavelengths. However, yellow toner is not phosphorescent, so it must
    be the phosphors they add to paper to make them appear "bright". Sure >enough, UV illumination worked best with 96 bright paper. I didn't
    have any 100 bright. However, UV illumination didn't improve
    visibility much.

    4. The tiny dots seem unevenly spread over the surface of the paper.
    You'll need to move the magnifying glass around the page to find the
    yellow dots. At 30x the depth of field is small. That means put the
    printed page on something flat.

    5. When I first started looking for the dots, I almost instantly saw
    them. About 1 minute later, the dots disappeared. What happened is
    that I had cataract surgery about 1 year ago. The problem was that it
    wasn't totally successful. As soon as I was able to rest my eyes a
    little, the dots re-appeared.

    6. I guessed that the designers did not include a feature where the
    dots moved around the page after each printed page. Therefore,
    over-printing the same page multiple times should improve visibility. >Unfortunately, my laser printer has a registration problem causing the >overprinted dots and text on the page to move. However, I have more
    dots to view. I found more barely visible yellow dots, but also a few
    very bright yellow dots.

    It's my understanding that the yellow dots also appear when "printing"
    to a file. I suspect that printing on dark paper will improve the
    contrast and make the yellow dots more visible. I would guess(tm)
    that a yellow filter might also help improve contrast. I haven't
    tried any of these (yet).

    Good luck.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Liebermann@jeffl@cruzio.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sat Feb 1 17:07:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:45:36 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:29:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R." >>><robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>> wrote:


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow >>>>>> pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some >>>>>> such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are >>>>> why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:

    Are they still doing this? :-o

    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web >>>sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html> >>>>>
    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I >>>>> had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the >>>>> transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not
    recommended.

    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >>>>anything.

    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >>>looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots >>>require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.

    I found the yellow dots, but it wasn't easy. As usual, I did
    everything wrong the first time I tried it.

    1. Use a magnifier. I found that a folding jewelers 30x loupe, with
    a built in white LED, worked well. This what I used: >><https://www.ebay.com/itm/116331398465>
    Both loupes were low quality, but the price was right. The UV light
    didn't do anything useful. I could try using one of my microscopes,
    but the kitchen table is currently occupied.

    2. Don't use paper with a rough or textured (linen, felt, laid, etc) >>surface. Try to find paper with a smooth surface. If it looks like
    the surface of the moon with a magnifier, find some other paper.

    3. Some articles suggest using UV illumination. I have a wide
    variety of UV lights in both LED and fluorescent in various
    wavelengths. However, yellow toner is not phosphorescent, so it must
    be the phosphors they add to paper to make them appear "bright". Sure >>enough, UV illumination worked best with 96 bright paper. I didn't
    have any 100 bright. However, UV illumination didn't improve
    visibility much.

    4. The tiny dots seem unevenly spread over the surface of the paper. >>You'll need to move the magnifying glass around the page to find the
    yellow dots. At 30x the depth of field is small. That means put the >>printed page on something flat.

    5. When I first started looking for the dots, I almost instantly saw
    them. About 1 minute later, the dots disappeared. What happened is
    that I had cataract surgery about 1 year ago. The problem was that it >>wasn't totally successful. As soon as I was able to rest my eyes a
    little, the dots re-appeared.

    6. I guessed that the designers did not include a feature where the
    dots moved around the page after each printed page. Therefore, >>over-printing the same page multiple times should improve visibility. >>Unfortunately, my laser printer has a registration problem causing the >>overprinted dots and text on the page to move. However, I have more
    dots to view. I found more barely visible yellow dots, but also a few
    very bright yellow dots.

    It's my understanding that the yellow dots also appear when "printing"
    to a file. I suspect that printing on dark paper will improve the
    contrast and make the yellow dots more visible. I would guess(tm)
    that a yellow filter might also help improve contrast. I haven't
    tried any of these (yet).

    Good luck.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

    I already posted that link a few messages upstream. It doesn't say
    much about how to best view the dots. So, I went to YouTube (as
    suggested).

    Here's one that features your favorite microscope:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?" <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sit6zUQKpJc>

    and one from EFF:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?" <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izMGMsIZK4U>

    As usual, I was doing it all wrong. I tried illuminating with UV, but
    should have used a blue LED and turned off the room lights.

    Dots all folks.
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lizard Cheney@lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sun Feb 2 11:31:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:45:36 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:29:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow >>>>>>> pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some >>>>>>> such claim.
    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom >>>>>> notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are >>>>>> why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:
    Are they still doing this? :-o
    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web
    sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off. >>>>
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html> >>>>>>
    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I >>>>>> had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old >>>>>> yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the >>>>>> transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not
    recommended.
    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >>>>> anything.
    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >>>> looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots
    require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.
    I found the yellow dots, but it wasn't easy. As usual, I did
    everything wrong the first time I tried it.

    1. Use a magnifier. I found that a folding jewelers 30x loupe, with
    a built in white LED, worked well. This what I used:
    <https://www.ebay.com/itm/116331398465>
    Both loupes were low quality, but the price was right. The UV light
    didn't do anything useful. I could try using one of my microscopes,
    but the kitchen table is currently occupied.

    2. Don't use paper with a rough or textured (linen, felt, laid, etc)
    surface. Try to find paper with a smooth surface. If it looks like
    the surface of the moon with a magnifier, find some other paper.

    3. Some articles suggest using UV illumination. I have a wide
    variety of UV lights in both LED and fluorescent in various
    wavelengths. However, yellow toner is not phosphorescent, so it must
    be the phosphors they add to paper to make them appear "bright". Sure
    enough, UV illumination worked best with 96 bright paper. I didn't
    have any 100 bright. However, UV illumination didn't improve
    visibility much.

    4. The tiny dots seem unevenly spread over the surface of the paper.
    You'll need to move the magnifying glass around the page to find the
    yellow dots. At 30x the depth of field is small. That means put the
    printed page on something flat.

    5. When I first started looking for the dots, I almost instantly saw
    them. About 1 minute later, the dots disappeared. What happened is
    that I had cataract surgery about 1 year ago. The problem was that it
    wasn't totally successful. As soon as I was able to rest my eyes a
    little, the dots re-appeared.

    6. I guessed that the designers did not include a feature where the
    dots moved around the page after each printed page. Therefore,
    over-printing the same page multiple times should improve visibility.
    Unfortunately, my laser printer has a registration problem causing the
    overprinted dots and text on the page to move. However, I have more
    dots to view. I found more barely visible yellow dots, but also a few
    very bright yellow dots.

    It's my understanding that the yellow dots also appear when "printing"
    to a file. I suspect that printing on dark paper will improve the
    contrast and make the yellow dots more visible. I would guess(tm)
    that a yellow filter might also help improve contrast. I haven't
    tried any of these (yet).

    Good luck.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots
    I already posted that link a few messages upstream. It doesn't say
    much about how to best view the dots. So, I went to YouTube (as
    suggested).

    Here's one that features your favorite microscope:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?" <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sit6zUQKpJc>

    and one from EFF:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?" <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izMGMsIZK4U>

    As usual, I was doing it all wrong. I tried illuminating with UV, but
    should have used a blue LED and turned off the room lights.

    Dots all folks.

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Liebermann@jeffl@cruzio.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sun Feb 2 09:48:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On Sun, 02 Feb 25 11:31:29 UTC, Lizard Cheney <lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept> wrote:

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    Dots all folks.

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FHEeG_uq5Y>

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.

    Nope. It was printed using a monochrome typewriter. We didn't have
    color laser printers in 1961: <https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf>
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cursitor Doom@cd@notformail.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Sun Feb 2 18:25:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On Sun, 02 Feb 2025 09:48:56 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 02 Feb 25 11:31:29 UTC, Lizard Cheney ><lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept> wrote:

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    Dots all folks.

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FHEeG_uq5Y>

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.

    Nope. It was printed using a monochrome typewriter. We didn't have
    color laser printers in 1961: ><https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf>

    That's not the same certificate that was originally posted on the
    White House website and caused all the furore around the forgery
    accusations, though.
    The original image was a clumsy composite paste-up job and a clear and
    obvious forgery. This is a different image altogether (but at least
    this time they've remembered to flatten it!)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lizard Cheney@lizard.cheney@insurrection.dept.j6 to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Mon Feb 3 10:59:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sun, 02 Feb 25 11:31:29 UTC, Lizard Cheney <lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept> wrote:

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    Dots all folks.
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FHEeG_uq5Y>

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.
    Nope. It was printed using a monochrome typewriter. We didn't have
    color laser printers in 1961: <https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf>


    I suspect Barry's original certificate was printed in Kenya.

    Obammy's fake certificate was printed on some Deep State laser printer.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Mon Feb 3 15:28:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On 2025-02-01 23:48, danny burstein wrote:
    [lots snipped]

    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was
    looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer.

    I have days like that too. As long as it's not weeks, I'm not too
    worried.

    here's an old series of articles by the kind folk at EFF
    describing the issue.

    https://www.eff.org/issues/printers

    I probably have read that long ago.

    Hum. Is this an USA thing? I think the EU privacy laws should make this illegal in the EU.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Liebermann@jeffl@cruzio.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Mon Feb 3 10:23:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:28:57 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 23:48, danny burstein wrote:
    [lots snipped]

    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >>>> looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer.

    I have days like that too. As long as it's not weeks, I'm not too
    worried.

    here's an old series of articles by the kind folk at EFF
    describing the issue.

    https://www.eff.org/issues/printers

    I probably have read that long ago.

    Hum. Is this an USA thing? I think the EU privacy laws should make this >illegal in the EU.

    I found very little on the topic for UK or EU printers:

    "EU: Printer Tracking Dots May Violate Human Rights" (Feb 18, 2008) <https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/02/eu-printer-tracking-dots-may-violate-human-rights>

    "Why printers add secret tracking dots" (Jun 3, 2020) <https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20170607-why-printers-add-secret-tracking-dots>

    "German researchers defeat printers' doc-tracking dots" (Jun 27, 2018) <https://www.theregister.com/2018/06/27/german_researchers_defeat_printer_tracking_dots/>
    <https://github.com/dfd-tud/deda>
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Mon Feb 3 14:01:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    Please don't pollute a technical thread with political nonsense.
    Especially obsolete allegations, especially my thread.

    If you continue to do this, I won't include AHR in technical posts and
    you'll be an even bigger blight on AHR.


    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sun, 02 Feb 25 11:31:29 UTC, Lizard Cheney <lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept> wrote:

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:45:36 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:29:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>> wrote:

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:

    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow >>>>>>>> pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some >>>>>>>> such claim.
    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom >>>>>>> notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are >>>>>>> why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other >>>>>>> toner colors. See:
    Are they still doing this? :-o
    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web >>>>> sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off. >>>>>
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html> >>>>>>>
    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I >>>>>>> had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old >>>>>>> yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the >>>>>>> transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not >>>>>>> recommended.
    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >>>>>> anything.
    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >>>>> looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots >>>>> require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.
    I found the yellow dots, but it wasn't easy. As usual, I did
    everything wrong the first time I tried it.

    1. Use a magnifier. I found that a folding jewelers 30x loupe, with
    a built in white LED, worked well. This what I used:
    <https://www.ebay.com/itm/116331398465>
    Both loupes were low quality, but the price was right. The UV light
    didn't do anything useful. I could try using one of my microscopes,
    but the kitchen table is currently occupied.

    2. Don't use paper with a rough or textured (linen, felt, laid, etc)
    surface. Try to find paper with a smooth surface. If it looks like
    the surface of the moon with a magnifier, find some other paper.

    3. Some articles suggest using UV illumination. I have a wide
    variety of UV lights in both LED and fluorescent in various
    wavelengths. However, yellow toner is not phosphorescent, so it must
    be the phosphors they add to paper to make them appear "bright". Sure >>>> enough, UV illumination worked best with 96 bright paper. I didn't
    have any 100 bright. However, UV illumination didn't improve
    visibility much.

    4. The tiny dots seem unevenly spread over the surface of the paper.
    You'll need to move the magnifying glass around the page to find the
    yellow dots. At 30x the depth of field is small. That means put the
    printed page on something flat.

    5. When I first started looking for the dots, I almost instantly saw
    them. About 1 minute later, the dots disappeared. What happened is
    that I had cataract surgery about 1 year ago. The problem was that it >>>> wasn't totally successful. As soon as I was able to rest my eyes a
    little, the dots re-appeared.

    6. I guessed that the designers did not include a feature where the
    dots moved around the page after each printed page. Therefore,
    over-printing the same page multiple times should improve visibility.
    Unfortunately, my laser printer has a registration problem causing the >>>> overprinted dots and text on the page to move. However, I have more
    dots to view. I found more barely visible yellow dots, but also a few >>>> very bright yellow dots.

    It's my understanding that the yellow dots also appear when "printing" >>>> to a file. I suspect that printing on dark paper will improve the
    contrast and make the yellow dots more visible. I would guess(tm)
    that a yellow filter might also help improve contrast. I haven't
    tried any of these (yet).

    Good luck.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots
    I already posted that link a few messages upstream. It doesn't say
    much about how to best view the dots. So, I went to YouTube (as
    suggested).

    Here's one that features your favorite microscope:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?"
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sit6zUQKpJc>

    and one from EFF:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?"
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izMGMsIZK4U>

    As usual, I was doing it all wrong. I tried illuminating with UV, but
    should have used a blue LED and turned off the room lights.

    Dots all folks.

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lizard Cheney@lizard.cheney@insurrection.dept.j6 to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,alt.home.repair on Tue Feb 4 11:02:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.repair

    micky wrote:
    Please don't pollute a technical thread with political nonsense.
    Especially obsolete allegations, especially my thread.

    If you continue to do this, I won't include AHR in technical posts and
    you'll be an even bigger blight on AHR.


    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sun, 02 Feb 25 11:31:29 UTC, Lizard Cheney <lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept> wrote:

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.

    Please don't top post. Top posting destroys the flow of the thread.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2