• Re: Sorry re history of Fortran, good post on LinkedIn

    From George Neuner@gneuner2@comcast.net to sci.electronics.design,comp.arch.embedded on Thu Feb 19 22:28:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 23:20:52 -0000 (UTC), Niocl|is P||l Caile|in de
    Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> wrote:

    In sci.electronics.design John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: >|---------------------------------------------------------------------| >|"Here's the index for December 2004. Looks OK to me. |
    | |
    | https://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/index/2004-12 |
    |" | >|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

    Dear Dr. Levine:

    It may be OK, but December-2004 articles with the sequence numbers
    that are
    001
    002
    003
    040
    126
    127
    128
    129
    130
    131
    132
    133
    134
    135
    136
    137
    138
    139
    140
    141
    142
    143
    144
    do not exist but e.g.
    HTTPS://compilers.IECC.com/comparch/article/04-12-182
    does exist. I feel that these numbers hint at very many suspiciously >inexistent articles. I confess that this does not prove anything.

    You are aware that NNTP (the Usenet protocol) allows:

    - messages not yet posted to be canceled
    - posted messages to be explicitly deleted
    - messages to contain an expiration date header
    (after which the server may auto-delete them)

    Deleted messages leave holes in the sequence.

    Not all NNTP servers honor all (or even any) these operations - but
    some do, and although 2004 is relatively recent, you should note that
    in the past servers tended to be more permissive because many fewer
    people were deliberately abusing them attempting to cause problems.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2