• makes no sense

    From john larkin@jl@glen--canyon.com to sci.electronics.design on Tue Dec 30 16:45:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design


    https://www.edn.com/guard-circuit-provides-impedance-matching/


    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Edward Rawde@invalid@invalid.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Tue Dec 30 21:47:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:lfs8lkp9ot9ivtq47o8dmq9rgriemr08fp@4ax.com...

    https://www.edn.com/guard-circuit-provides-impedance-matching/


    Well it uses a 555.
    The comments at the end suggest that there may be a few errors.


    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bill Sloman@bill.sloman@ieee.org to sci.electronics.design on Wed Dec 31 17:11:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 31/12/2025 11:45 am, john larkin wrote:

    https://www.edn.com/guard-circuit-provides-impedance-matching/

    The concept is perfectly sensible. The execution is about what you'd
    expect from EDN.

    https://www.wiley.com/en-be/Grounding+and+Shielding%3A+Circuits+and+Interference%2C+6th+Edition-p-9781119183747

    I was very fond of the first 1967 edition, and when I ran out of
    employers to buy it for me I bought the 4th 1998 edition.

    Driven shields have been around forever.
    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to sci.electronics.design on Wed Dec 31 09:31:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
    [...]

    Driven shields have been around forever.

    Since the mid 1930s, invented by Blumlein.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From john larkin@jl@glen--canyon.com to sci.electronics.design on Wed Dec 31 02:43:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 21:47:04 -0500, "Edward Rawde"
    <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:lfs8lkp9ot9ivtq47o8dmq9rgriemr08fp@4ax.com...

    https://www.edn.com/guard-circuit-provides-impedance-matching/


    Well it uses a 555.
    The comments at the end suggest that there may be a few errors.


    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    The Aspencore group bought Electronic Products and EE Times and EDN
    and some others and wrecked them. They repeat the same junk across
    multiple sites.

    EndeavorB2B owns Electronic Design and Microwaves&RF and some others.
    It's not as bad.


    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bill Sloman@bill.sloman@ieee.org to sci.electronics.design on Thu Jan 1 00:28:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 31/12/2025 8:31 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
    [...]

    Driven shields have been around forever.

    Since the mid 1930s, invented by Blumlein.

    I worked at EMI Central Research for a couple of years (1976-1979), but
    I'd heard of the Blumlein bridge even before that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Blumlein

    He died at age 38, and had his name on 128 patents. The IET has
    published a biography, but it doesn't do him justice.

    "The Life and Times of A.D. Blumlein" by Russel Burns ISBN 0 85296 773 X
    and 978-0-85296-773-7
    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to sci.electronics.design on Wed Dec 31 13:39:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 31/12/2025 8:31 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
    [...]

    Driven shields have been around forever.

    Since the mid 1930s, invented by Blumlein.

    I worked at EMI Central Research for a couple of years (1976-1979), but
    I'd heard of the Blumlein bridge even before that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Blumlein

    He died at age 38, and had his name on 128 patents. The IET has
    published a biography, but it doesn't do him justice.

    "The Life and Times of A.D. Blumlein" by Russel Burns ISBN 0 85296 773 X
    and 978-0-85296-773-7

    That is an excellent book - but be aware there is another book with a
    very similar title which is a complete load of rubbish.

    I was priviledged to have met Alan Blumlein's son, Simon, on several
    occasions and chatted to him about his father. Simon died about a year
    ago; he was a lovely character with a similar sense of humour to his
    dad.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bill Sloman@bill.sloman@ieee.org to sci.electronics.design on Thu Jan 1 03:15:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 1/01/2026 12:39 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 31/12/2025 8:31 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
    [...]

    Driven shields have been around forever.

    Since the mid 1930s, invented by Blumlein.

    I worked at EMI Central Research for a couple of years (1976-1979), but
    I'd heard of the Blumlein bridge even before that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Blumlein

    He died at age 38, and had his name on 128 patents. The IET has
    published a biography, but it doesn't do him justice.

    "The Life and Times of A.D. Blumlein" by Russel Burns ISBN 0 85296 773 X
    and 978-0-85296-773-7

    That is an excellent book - but be aware there is another book with a
    very similar title which is a complete load of rubbish.

    I was priviledged to have met Alan Blumlein's son, Simon, on several occasions and chatted to him about his father. Simon died about a year
    ago; he was a lovely character with a similar sense of humour to his
    dad.

    I envy you the personal acquaintance. I wasn't all that impressed by the
    book. I don't think the author knew much about the electronics that
    Blumlein worked on (few people do - he worked in a lot of different
    areas) and it struck me as rather superficial in consequence.
    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to sci.electronics.design on Wed Dec 31 17:35:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 1/01/2026 12:39 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 31/12/2025 8:31 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
    [...]

    Driven shields have been around forever.

    Since the mid 1930s, invented by Blumlein.

    I worked at EMI Central Research for a couple of years (1976-1979), but
    I'd heard of the Blumlein bridge even before that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Blumlein

    He died at age 38, and had his name on 128 patents. The IET has
    published a biography, but it doesn't do him justice.

    "The Life and Times of A.D. Blumlein" by Russel Burns ISBN 0 85296 773 X >> and 978-0-85296-773-7

    That is an excellent book - but be aware there is another book with a
    very similar title which is a complete load of rubbish.

    I was priviledged to have met Alan Blumlein's son, Simon, on several occasions and chatted to him about his father. Simon died about a year ago; he was a lovely character with a similar sense of humour to his
    dad.

    I envy you the personal acquaintance.

    I was very lucky. Simon Blumlein was a patron of the City of London
    Phonograph and Gramophone Society and he attended their AGMs (and spoke
    at some of them). I happened to see him killing time before the evening
    meal and we fell into conversation. After that, we often had a quick
    chat when time permitted.

    I managed to record two of his talks, one on his researches into his
    father's life and the other on his own life (he was deeply involved in
    optical design, loved a wide range of music and was also a ballet dancer
    in his spare time!).


    I wasn't all that impressed by the
    book. I don't think the author knew much about the electronics that
    Blumlein worked on (few people do - he worked in a lot of different
    areas) and it struck me as rather superficial in consequence.

    I thought the IET book wasn't too bad, are you sure that was the book
    you read?

    The other Book (whose name I have forgotten) was much much worse. The
    author knew less than nothing about electronics or anything remotely
    scientific i.e. he thought he understood but obviously didn't have a
    clue. For the benefit of less expert readers than himself, he provided explanations of the technical details in pseudo-scientific gobbledeygook
    using technical terms he had read in the source material but clearly
    failed to understand.

    It is one of the few books I have read where the author has added
    negative value to his source material.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bill Sloman@bill.sloman@ieee.org to sci.electronics.design on Fri Jan 2 17:06:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 1/01/2026 4:35 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 1/01/2026 12:39 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 31/12/2025 8:31 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
    [...]

    Driven shields have been around forever.

    Since the mid 1930s, invented by Blumlein.

    I worked at EMI Central Research for a couple of years (1976-1979), but >>>> I'd heard of the Blumlein bridge even before that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Blumlein

    He died at age 38, and had his name on 128 patents. The IET has
    published a biography, but it doesn't do him justice.

    "The Life and Times of A.D. Blumlein" by Russel Burns ISBN 0 85296 773 X >>>> and 978-0-85296-773-7

    That is an excellent book - but be aware there is another book with a
    very similar title which is a complete load of rubbish.

    I was priviledged to have met Alan Blumlein's son, Simon, on several
    occasions and chatted to him about his father. Simon died about a year
    ago; he was a lovely character with a similar sense of humour to his
    dad.

    I envy you the personal acquaintance.

    I was very lucky. Simon Blumlein was a patron of the City of London Phonograph and Gramophone Society and he attended their AGMs (and spoke
    at some of them). I happened to see him killing time before the evening
    meal and we fell into conversation. After that, we often had a quick
    chat when time permitted.

    I managed to record two of his talks, one on his researches into his
    father's life and the other on his own life (he was deeply involved in optical design, loved a wide range of music and was also a ballet dancer
    in his spare time!).


    I wasn't all that impressed by the
    book. I don't think the author knew much about the electronics that
    Blumlein worked on (few people do - he worked in a lot of different
    areas) and it struck me as rather superficial in consequence.

    I thought the IET book wasn't too bad, are you sure that was the book
    you read?

    It's on my booKshelf and I posted both it's 10 and 13 digit ISBN numbers.

    The other Book (whose name I have forgotten) was much much worse. The
    author knew less than nothing about electronics or anything remotely scientific i.e. he thought he understood but obviously didn't have a
    clue. For the benefit of less expert readers than himself, he provided explanations of the technical details in pseudo-scientific gobbledeygook using technical terms he had read in the source material but clearly
    failed to understand.

    It is one of the few books I have read where the author has added
    negative value to his source material.

    The Russel Burns book wasn't that bad - it was just weak on the
    technical content.

    I've just re-read the last chapter, on the H2S radar whose flight trial
    killed Blumlein, and the technical analysis doesn't go deeper than distinguishing between klystons and magnetrons. It's remarkably superficial.
    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to sci.electronics.design on Fri Jan 2 08:53:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 1/01/2026 4:35 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 1/01/2026 12:39 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 31/12/2025 8:31 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
    [...]

    Driven shields have been around forever.

    Since the mid 1930s, invented by Blumlein.

    I worked at EMI Central Research for a couple of years (1976-1979), but >>>> I'd heard of the Blumlein bridge even before that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Blumlein

    He died at age 38, and had his name on 128 patents. The IET has
    published a biography, but it doesn't do him justice.

    "The Life and Times of A.D. Blumlein" by Russel Burns ISBN 0 85296 773 X >>>> and 978-0-85296-773-7

    That is an excellent book - but be aware there is another book with a
    very similar title which is a complete load of rubbish.

    I was priviledged to have met Alan Blumlein's son, Simon, on several
    occasions and chatted to him about his father. Simon died about a year >>> ago; he was a lovely character with a similar sense of humour to his
    dad.

    I envy you the personal acquaintance.

    I was very lucky. Simon Blumlein was a patron of the City of London Phonograph and Gramophone Society and he attended their AGMs (and spoke
    at some of them). I happened to see him killing time before the evening meal and we fell into conversation. After that, we often had a quick
    chat when time permitted.

    I managed to record two of his talks, one on his researches into his father's life and the other on his own life (he was deeply involved in optical design, loved a wide range of music and was also a ballet dancer
    in his spare time!).


    I wasn't all that impressed by the
    book. I don't think the author knew much about the electronics that
    Blumlein worked on (few people do - he worked in a lot of different
    areas) and it struck me as rather superficial in consequence.

    I thought the IET book wasn't too bad, are you sure that was the book
    you read?

    It's on my booKshelf and I posted both it's 10 and 13 digit ISBN numbers.

    The other Book (whose name I have forgotten) was much much worse. The author knew less than nothing about electronics or anything remotely scientific i.e. he thought he understood but obviously didn't have a
    clue. For the benefit of less expert readers than himself, he provided explanations of the technical details in pseudo-scientific gobbledeygook using technical terms he had read in the source material but clearly
    failed to understand.

    It is one of the few books I have read where the author has added
    negative value to his source material.

    The Russel Burns book wasn't that bad - it was just weak on the
    technical content.

    Yes, the technical content in Russel Burns' book wasn't too deep but it
    was accurate and logical - unlike the other book which went into great
    detail and got it wrong.

    I've just re-read the last chapter, on the H2S radar whose flight trial killed Blumlein, and the technical analysis doesn't go deeper than distinguishing between klystons and magnetrons. It's remarkably superficial.

    Similarly the section on Blumlein's improved recorder isn't very deep.
    In fact almost any book which attempted to cover all of Blumlein's
    inventions would have to draw a line somewhere, otherwise it would
    become completely unwieldy.

    I have read his notes (elsewhere) on the design of the cutterhead
    equaliser, it took me several days to understand the way he was thinking
    about it. He eventually gave up the detailed analysis and basically
    said "I'm not sure exactly why, but it just works".
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bill Sloman@bill.sloman@ieee.org to sci.electronics.design on Sat Jan 3 00:38:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 2/01/2026 7:53 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 1/01/2026 4:35 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 1/01/2026 12:39 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 31/12/2025 8:31 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
    [...]

    Driven shields have been around forever.

    Since the mid 1930s, invented by Blumlein.

    I worked at EMI Central Research for a couple of years (1976-1979), but >>>>>> I'd heard of the Blumlein bridge even before that.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Blumlein

    He died at age 38, and had his name on 128 patents. The IET has
    published a biography, but it doesn't do him justice.

    "The Life and Times of A.D. Blumlein" by Russel Burns ISBN 0 85296 773 X >>>>>> and 978-0-85296-773-7

    That is an excellent book - but be aware there is another book with a >>>>> very similar title which is a complete load of rubbish.

    I was priviledged to have met Alan Blumlein's son, Simon, on several >>>>> occasions and chatted to him about his father. Simon died about a year >>>>> ago; he was a lovely character with a similar sense of humour to his >>>>> dad.

    I envy you the personal acquaintance.

    I was very lucky. Simon Blumlein was a patron of the City of London
    Phonograph and Gramophone Society and he attended their AGMs (and spoke
    at some of them). I happened to see him killing time before the evening >>> meal and we fell into conversation. After that, we often had a quick
    chat when time permitted.

    I managed to record two of his talks, one on his researches into his
    father's life and the other on his own life (he was deeply involved in
    optical design, loved a wide range of music and was also a ballet dancer >>> in his spare time!).


    I wasn't all that impressed by the
    book. I don't think the author knew much about the electronics that
    Blumlein worked on (few people do - he worked in a lot of different
    areas) and it struck me as rather superficial in consequence.

    I thought the IET book wasn't too bad, are you sure that was the book
    you read?

    It's on my booKshelf and I posted both it's 10 and 13 digit ISBN numbers.

    The other Book (whose name I have forgotten) was much much worse. The
    author knew less than nothing about electronics or anything remotely
    scientific i.e. he thought he understood but obviously didn't have a
    clue. For the benefit of less expert readers than himself, he provided
    explanations of the technical details in pseudo-scientific gobbledeygook >>> using technical terms he had read in the source material but clearly
    failed to understand.

    It is one of the few books I have read where the author has added
    negative value to his source material.

    The Russel Burns book wasn't that bad - it was just weak on the
    technical content.

    Yes, the technical content in Russel Burns' book wasn't too deep but it
    was accurate and logical - unlike the other book which went into great
    detail and got it wrong.

    I've just re-read the last chapter, on the H2S radar whose flight trial
    killed Blumlein, and the technical analysis doesn't go deeper than
    distinguishing between klystons and magnetrons. It's remarkably superficial.

    Similarly the section on Blumlein's improved recorder isn't very deep.
    In fact almost any book which attempted to cover all of Blumlein's
    inventions would have to draw a line somewhere, otherwise it would
    become completely unwieldy.

    That's where you need an author like Tracy Kidder, who can capture some
    of the complexity without losing the reader's attention.

    I have read his notes (elsewhere) on the design of the cutterhead
    equaliser, it took me several days to understand the way he was thinking about it. He eventually gave up the detailed analysis and basically
    said "I'm not sure exactly why, but it just works".

    Empirical assertions, backed up by thorough analysis, can be convincing. Before modern computers, numerical analysis ran out of puff pretty quickly.

    Well constructed experimental tests can explore the edges of the
    performance limits in an informative way.
    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney




    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2