From Newsgroup: sci.crypt

Stefan Claas wrote:

Gabx, it is hopeless to educate those litte U.S. Democrats. Good thing
is Eurasia with all its cool people (except Nazi Ukrainians and their
western supporters) are on the rise and BRICS. And that is the reason
why the little Gang anround D can't stand this nor accept this. CIA
is already pretty much pissed off , because their plans, after WW2 no
longer work.

So simply ignore those little U.S. Democrats and let us continue our
work, while ignoring them.

You're right but hold on,
i have still something to say to these useless craps.

It's always the same predictable circus here. A bunch of Winzoz bound "privacy experts" who have never written a line of real code in their life, storming into every discussion like some self-appointed priests of anonymous communication, as long as it runs on their precious winzoz garbage.

You come here not to contribute, but to mock, to derail, and to flaunt tools that are glorified GUI wrappers around black boxes you don't even understand. OmniMix? Please. If it doesn't crash, it leaks. But you love it because it doesn't force you to *think*. It just *feels* safe.

That's not privacy. That's digital Stockholm Syndrome.

The fact that there is people writing software, building infrastructure, and push open standards seems to offend you.
Maybe it's because your mindset is consumerist, not creative. You can't fork a repo. You can't read a log.
You can't even function outside your sandboxed, nanny state OS without pissing your pants.

But you're loud. Always loud. And always American. Doesn't matter if you're red, blue, MAGA, or corporate Democrat, your entitlement stinks the same. You treat the internet like your backyard barbecue and every non WINZOZ project like an alien threat. No wonder your approach to privacy is so paranoid and proprietary you think everything has to be *yours* to be legitimate.

Worse, some of you probably *are* state adjacent. It's not tinfoil to suspect it anymore. When someone spends this much time sabotaging open source discourse while pushing winzoz alternatives, the conclusion isn't far fetched.

You think because your ancestors wiped out entire peoples and built a police state on stolen land that you can roll over this conversation too. You can't. This isn't your reservation to fence off. You're not the arbiters of what "works." You're just loud, clumsy colonizers in a space you neither built nor understand.

So no, we're not trolls. We're the ones doing the hard, ugly, technical work so that maybe *someone* out there gets a little real privacy. Not a Winzoz checkbox. Not a "VPN + remailer = safety" fantasy. Actual, functional anonymity.

You don't like our tools? Fine. But don't confuse your ignorance with our incompetence.

You want a safe space for your OmniMix cult? Start a Facebook group. Otherwise, get used to the idea that your days as gatekeepers are over.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.crypt

On 5/30/2025 10:06 AM, Gabx wrote:

Stefan Claas wrote:

[...]

You want a safe space for your OmniMix cult? Start a Facebook group. Otherwise, get used to the idea that your days as gatekeepers are over.

I am not sure who you are referring to? Using windows is fine, Linux,
fine, ect...

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.crypt

Gabx wrote:

OmniMix? Please. If it doesn't crash, it leaks.

When does OmniMix crash and where does it leak any data?

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.crypt

Gabx wrote:

Stefan Claas wrote:

Gabx, it is hopeless to educate those litte U.S. Democrats. Good thing
is Eurasia with all its cool people (except Nazi Ukrainians and their
western supporters) are on the rise and BRICS. And that is the reason
why the little Gang anround D can't stand this nor accept this. CIA
is already pretty much pissed off , because their plans, after WW2 no
longer work.

So simply ignore those little U.S. Democrats and let us continue our
work, while ignoring them.

You're right but hold on,
i have still something to say to these useless craps.

It's always the same predictable circus here. A bunch of Winzoz bound "privacy experts" who have never written a line of real code in their life, storming into every discussion like some self-appointed priests of anonymous communication, as long as it runs on their precious winzoz garbage.

You come here not to contribute, but to mock, to derail, and to flaunt tools that are glorified GUI wrappers around black boxes you don't even understand. OmniMix? Please. If it doesn't crash, it leaks. But you love it because it doesn't force you to *think*. It just *feels* safe.

That's not privacy. That's digital Stockholm Syndrome.

The fact that there is people writing software, building infrastructure, and push open standards seems to offend you.
Maybe it's because your mindset is consumerist, not creative. You can't fork a repo. You can't read a log.
You can't even function outside your sandboxed, nanny state OS without pissing your pants.

But you're loud. Always loud. And always American. Doesn't matter if you're red, blue, MAGA, or corporate Democrat, your entitlement stinks the same. You treat the internet like your backyard barbecue and every non WINZOZ project like an alien threat. No wonder your approach to privacy is so paranoid and proprietary you think everything has to be *yours* to be legitimate.

Worse, some of you probably *are* state adjacent. It's not tinfoil to suspect it anymore. When someone spends this much time sabotaging open source discourse while pushing winzoz alternatives, the conclusion isn't far fetched.

You think because your ancestors wiped out entire peoples and built a police state on stolen land that you can roll over this conversation too. You can't. This isn't your reservation to fence off. You're not the arbiters of what "works." You're just loud, clumsy colonizers in a space you neither built nor understand.

So no, we're not trolls. We're the ones doing the hard, ugly, technical work so that maybe *someone* out there gets a little real privacy. Not a Winzoz checkbox. Not a "VPN + remailer = safety" fantasy. Actual, functional anonymity.

You don't like our tools? Fine. But don't confuse your ignorance with our incompetence.

You want a safe space for your OmniMix cult? Start a Facebook group. Otherwise, get used to the idea that your days as gatekeepers are over.

I couldn't have described your symptoms any better.

Both of you are arrogant lying fascists. Period.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.crypt

Anonymous User wrote:

Gabx wrote:

OmniMix? Please. If it doesn't crash, it leaks.

When does OmniMix crash and where does it leak any data?

You really expect an answer from this habitual liar?

OM as a background task handles all my email and Usenet traffic for
years now and it only crashed when it ran out of memory. Give its
components combined at least 200MB of RAM and it's absolutely reliable
even while bombarded with a whole bunch of simultaneous I/O tasks.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2