https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2OYcptFl9c
Paul Serrano's discovery
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2OYcptFl9cDoes having three toes count for cloven? And cud-chewing, of course.
Paul Serrano's discovery
On 11/17/25 3:25 AM, Popping Mad wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2OYcptFl9cDoes having three toes count for cloven?-a And cud-chewing, of course.
Paul Serrano's discovery
On 11/17/25 4:18 PM, erik simpson wrote:
On 11/17/25 3:25 AM, Popping Mad wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2OYcptFl9cDoes having three toes count for cloven?-a And cud-chewing, of course.
Paul Serrano's discovery
It had to chew its cud... that seems to be what the gizzard is for.
On 11/17/25 7:23 PM, Popping Mad wrote:
On 11/17/25 4:18 PM, erik simpson wrote:
On 11/17/25 3:25 AM, Popping Mad wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2OYcptFl9cDoes having three toes count for cloven?-a And cud-chewing, of course.
Paul Serrano's discovery
It had to chew its cud... that seems to be what the gizzard is for.
Does a chicken chew its cud, then? Anyway, ornithopods would seem to be functionally perissodactyl.
ollagen has been detected in hadrosaur fossils, so it's unlikely but
still possible someone might eat some.
Aren't reptiles non-kosher anyway?
According to Wikipedia, one Barnum Brown discovered gastroliths
associated with a hadrosaur.-a That would vote against cud-chewing, at
least among living animals.-a Collagen has been detected in hadrosaur fossils, so it's unlikely but still possible someone might eat some.
Aren't reptiles non-kosher anyway?
On 11/18/25 11:45 AM, erik simpson wrote:
ollagen has been detected in hadrosaur fossils, so it's unlikely but
still possible someone might eat some.
Aren't reptiles non-kosher anyway?
Some birds are Kosher.
On 11/19/25 03:02, Popping Mad wrote:
On 11/18/25 11:45 AM, erik simpson wrote:
ollagen has been detected in hadrosaur fossils, so it's unlikely but
still possible someone might eat some.
Aren't reptiles non-kosher anyway?
Some birds are Kosher.
Is the nature of the fossil such that the remains clearly
show that the animal did NOT have feathers?
Is it the other way around?
On 11/20/25 10:08 AM, x wrote:
On 11/19/25 03:02, Popping Mad wrote:The fossil evidence so far finds feathers appearing is Coelurosaurid dinosaurs, which are in the broad group of therpods.-a Hadrosaurs are in
On 11/18/25 11:45 AM, erik simpson wrote:
ollagen has been detected in hadrosaur fossils, so it's unlikely but
still possible someone might eat some.
Aren't reptiles non-kosher anyway?
Some birds are Kosher.
Is the nature of the fossil such that the remains clearly
show that the animal did NOT have feathers?
Is it the other way around?
a different clade, and so far no feathers have been noted. (It may be of passing interest that Oregon State University was long a hotbed of acceptance of Alan Feduccia's idea that birds are not descendants of dinosaurs at all.-a They sometimes described themselves and BANDITS
(birds are not dinosaurs) or MANIAICS (maniraptoransare not in
acutallity celosaurians).-a Most of this noise died out areound 2010, execept for continued support from creationist sources.)
The fossil evidence so far finds feathers appearing is Coelurosaurid dinosaurs, which are in the broad group of therpods.-a Hadrosaurs are in
a different clade, and so far no feathers have been noted. (It may be of passing interest that Oregon State University was long a hotbed of
acceptance of Alan Feduccia's idea that birds are not descendants of dinosaurs at all.-a They sometimes described themselves and BANDITS
(birds are not dinosaurs) or MANIAICS (maniraptoransare not in
acutallity celosaurians).-a Most of this noise died out areound 2010,
execept for continued support from creationist sources.)
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:50:55 |
| Calls: | 743 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| Messages: | 187,735 |