• Salterella and Volborthella Have Cnidarian Affinities?

    From Inyo@inyo@altavista.com to sci.bio.paleontology on Thu Oct 16 14:32:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.bio.paleontology

    Just in. The authors of a new paper suggest that the diminutive, extinct
    early Cambrian conical fossils Salterella and Volborthella--previously assigned to the Phylum Agmata by Ellis Yochelson in 1977--have Cnidarian affinities.

    See the paper "A Cnidarian Affinity for Salterella and Volborthella: Implications for the Evolution of Shells" over at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/cnidarian-affinity-for-salterella-and-volborthella-implications-for-the-evolution-of-shells/06EC06239D6E9C7A5173C382FDD5BC30
    . This is the full paper. Not just an abstract.

    An aside here: I've found loads of Salterella in the lower Cambrian
    Harkless Formation in vicinity of where the authors collected their
    specimens for the published study--in Esmeralda County, Nevada.
    Salterella and Volborthella are fascinating fossils, indeed. I'm much
    happy that more formal paleontological attention is finally being paid
    to them.

    One more thing: The authors remark that the Salteralla they recovered
    from localities in Nevada's lower Cambrian Harkless Formation are
    curved, whereas all other Salterella studied (from Virginia and the
    Yukon, for example) showed shells of non-curved (AKA, straight)
    morphological construction.

    Here's the thing. I don't recollect finding any curved Salterella shells
    from the Harkless Formation localities I examined in the vicinity of
    where the authors collected their Salterella specimens; they were all straight. But I did find several curved conical shells that I initially assumed belonged to Salterella at a specific site several miles distant
    from where the authors collected their curved Salterella material. Later
    on down the line, I got hold of a paper that described such curved
    conical shells from Nevada's Harkless Formation as Lidaconus--not
    Salterella. Bottom line: I'd been led to believe that Salterella shells
    were straight, while similar curved conical critters from the Harkless Formation were Lidaconus.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Harshman@john.harshman@gmail.com to sci.bio.paleontology on Thu Oct 16 20:59:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.bio.paleontology

    On 10/16/25 2:32 PM, Inyo wrote:
    Just in. The authors of a new paper suggest that the diminutive, extinct early Cambrian conical fossils Salterella and Volborthella--previously assigned to the Phylum Agmata by Ellis Yochelson in 1977--have Cnidarian affinities.

    See the paper "A Cnidarian Affinity for Salterella and Volborthella: Implications for the Evolution of Shells" over at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/cnidarian-affinity-for-salterella-and-volborthella-implications-for-the-evolution-of-shells/06EC06239D6E9C7A5173C382FDD5BC30 . This is the full paper. Not just an abstract.

    An aside here: I've found loads of Salterella in the lower Cambrian
    Harkless Formation in vicinity of where the authors collected their specimens for the published study--in Esmeralda County, Nevada.
    Salterella and Volborthella are fascinating fossils, indeed. I'm much
    happy that more formal paleontological attention is finally being paid
    to them.

    Question: is this Cambrian 1, 2, or 3?

    One more thing: The authors remark that the Salteralla they recovered
    from localities in Nevada's lower Cambrian Harkless Formation are
    curved, whereas all other Salterella studied (from Virginia and the
    Yukon, for example) showed shells of non-curved (AKA, straight) morphological construction.

    Here's the thing. I don't recollect finding any curved Salterella shells from the Harkless Formation localities I examined in the vicinity of
    where the authors collected their Salterella specimens; they were all straight. But I did find several curved conical shells that I initially assumed belonged to Salterella at a specific site several miles distant
    from where the authors collected their curved Salterella material. Later
    on down the line, I got hold of a paper that described such curved
    conical shells from Nevada's Harkless Formation as Lidaconus--not Salterella. Bottom line: I'd been led to believe that Salterella shells
    were straight, while similar curved conical critters from the Harkless Formation were Lidaconus.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2