1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. rocksolid.shared.i2p

  • [Q] i2pd-2.53.0-1

    From yeti@yeti@tilde.institute to rocksolid.shared.i2p on Sat Oct 26 12:23:30 2024
    From Newsgroup: rocksolid.shared.i2p

    I'm running Debian's i2pd-2.53.0-1 on Debian11/amd64, Devuan12/armel and Devuan12/armhf and (Surprise!) I've questions.

    W3M's output of <http://localhost:7070> (with tunnels "renamed"): ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    i2pd webconsole
    Main page

    Router commands
    Local Destinations
    Tunnels
    Transit Tunnels
    Transports
    I2P tunnels
    SAM sessions
    Client Tunnels:
    IRC-ILITA rcE aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.b32.i2p
    HTTP Proxy rcE bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb.b32.i2p SOCKS Proxy rcE bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb.b32.i2p

    Server Tunnels:
    kumari_ssh rcA cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc.b32.i2p:22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (On the ARMish systems I've web server tunnels too.)


    1. The tunnel config for ILITA has only commented lines on all of my
    systems because I prefer to use the socks proxy for IRC. Why is that
    tunnel active on every system I run I2PD on? It even stays active
    when its config file is removed. That just does not feel right.

    2. I see the HTTP and SOCKs proxy use the same "address" and sure they
    use different ports. So I tried to run the HTTP and SSH with the
    same key.dat file and it works too.

    Because I'm not trying to hide and just want constant addresses from
    I2P(D), for some systems having only one address might be nicer for
    my neighbours connecting to them.

    Is there a reason *not* to do this?
    --
    2. Hitchhiker 17: (110) "Careful with that hammer, sir," he said.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From yeti@yeti@tilde.institute to rocksolid.shared.i2p on Sat Oct 26 12:43:09 2024
    From Newsgroup: rocksolid.shared.i2p

    Ok.

    Aaaaaaah... 'tunnels.conf' vs 'tunnels.conf.d' ...confusion by default.

    Q-=1 ;-)
    --
    I do not bite, I just want to play.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Anonymous@Anonymous@rocksolidbbs.com (Anonymous) to rocksolid.shared.i2p on Sat Oct 26 13:52:06 2024
    From Newsgroup: rocksolid.shared.i2p

    On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 12:01:09 +0000, yeti wrote:

    Ok.

    Aaaaaaah... 'tunnels.conf' vs 'tunnels.conf.d' ...confusion by default.

    Q-=1 ;-)

    Nice! Glad u were able to help... yourself :)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From yeti@yeti@tilde.institute to rocksolid.shared.i2p on Sat Oct 26 15:13:18 2024
    From Newsgroup: rocksolid.shared.i2p

    Anonymous@rocksolidbbs.com (Anonymous) wrote:

    On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 12:01:09 +0000, yeti wrote:

    Aaaaaaah... 'tunnels.conf' vs 'tunnels.conf.d' ...confusion by
    default.

    Q-=1 ;-)

    Nice! Glad u were able to help... yourself :)

    That's like cigarette magic: As soon as you light one, the bus comes (or
    the food is ready).

    This seems to be common enough to even have some "nicknames" like
    talking with teddy bears or rubber ducks.

    At least the other Q still is open.
    --
    4. Hitchhiker 11:
    (72) "Watch the road!'' she yelped.
    (73) "Shit!"
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2