• Apparently we've now got 2 World Club Championships!

    From Mark@noreply@pugleaf.net.invalid to rec.sport.soccer on Thu Dec 18 12:42:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    According to FIFA, the FIFA Intercontinental Cup is a World Championship.

    From FIFA's web-site:

    "The battle for the ultimate annual club accolade, the FIFA Intercontinental Cup (Match 5) will be a one-off match, played in the same host nation as matches 3 and 4, to determine the club champions of the world for each calendar year."

    "Since it was first launched rCo as the FIFA Club World Championship in 2000 rCo the FIFA Intercontinental Cup has evolved to become the premier annual tournament in global club football, with the winners of the final match holding the crown of world champions for the next calendar year."

    Then they list all the World Champions and include Real Madrid 2024!

    https://www.fifa.com/en/tournaments/mens/intercontinentalcup/2024/articles/information-tournament-details

    If the FIFA Intercontinental Cup and the Club World Cup are both given equal status, then doesn't that prove that the Club World Cup is pretty meaningless now? Especially as we've now got 2 World Champions in the same year?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Werner Pichler@no_email@invalid.invalid to rec.sport.soccer on Thu Dec 18 16:06:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Mark <noreply@pugleaf.net.invalid> wrote:
    According to FIFA, the FIFA Intercontinental Cup is a World Championship.

    From FIFA's web-site:

    "The battle for the ultimate annual club accolade, the FIFA
    Intercontinental Cup (Match 5) will be a one-off match, played in the
    same host nation as matches 3 and 4, to determine the club champions of
    the world for each calendar year."

    "Since it was first launched rCo as the FIFA Club World Championship in
    2000 rCo the FIFA Intercontinental Cup has evolved to become the premier annual tournament in global club football, with the winners of the final match holding the crown of world champions for the next calendar year."

    Then they list all the World Champions and include Real Madrid 2024!

    https://www.fifa.com/en/tournaments/mens/intercontinentalcup/2024/articles/information-tournament-details

    If the FIFA Intercontinental Cup and the Club World Cup are both given
    equal status, then doesn't that prove that the Club World Cup is pretty meaningless now? Especially as we've now got 2 World Champions in the same year?



    See, even FIFA donrCOt take any of this seriously.


    Ciao,
    Werner
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Blueshirt@blueshirt@indigo.news to rec.sport.soccer on Thu Dec 18 17:42:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Mark wrote:

    If the FIFA Intercontinental Cup and the Club World Cup
    are both given equal status, then doesn't that prove that
    the Club World Cup is pretty meaningless now? Especially
    as we've now got 2 World Champions in the same year?

    Welcome to the real world... you finally got there!

    They've ALWAYS been meaningless competitions and only stupid
    people think otherwise. Those type of glorified friendly
    match-ups are good for sponsors and making a bit of money, but
    in the big scheme of things they are not important competitions
    at all.

    Nothing FIFA do anymore is good for the game... they have an
    agenda and it's all about them, making money and Gianni Infantino
    lining his own pockets whilst boosting his ego at the same time.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jesper_Lauridsen@noreply@pugleaf.net.invalid to rec.sport.soccer on Fri Dec 19 21:15:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Testing to see if pugleaf is alive.


    On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:42:02 +0000, Mark wrote:

    According to FIFA, the FIFA Intercontinental Cup is a World Championship.

    From FIFA's web-site:

    "The battle for the ultimate annual club accolade, the FIFA Intercontinental Cup (Match 5) will be a one-off match, played in the same host nation as matches 3 and 4, to determine the club champions of the world for each calendar year."

    "Since it was first launched rCo as the FIFA Club World Championship in 2000 rCo the FIFA Intercontinental Cup has evolved to become the premier annual tournament in global club football, with the winners of the final match holding the crown of world champions for the next calendar year."

    Then they list all the World Champions and include Real Madrid 2024!

    https://www.fifa.com/en/tournaments/mens/intercontinentalcup/2024/articles/information-tournament-details

    If the FIFA Intercontinental Cup and the Club World Cup are both given equal status, then doesn't that prove that the Club World Cup is pretty meaningless now? Especially as we've now got 2 World Champions in the same year?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jesper Lauridsen@rorschak@stofanet.dk to rec.sport.soccer on Fri Dec 19 22:17:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    On 19/12/2025 22.15, Jesper_Lauridsen wrote:
    Testing to see if pugleaf is alive.

    Made it to eternal september.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@noreply@pugleaf.net.invalid to rec.sport.soccer on Tue Dec 23 15:45:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:15:14 +0000, JesperLauridsen wrote:

    Testing to see if pugleaf is alive.

    Well I thought it was. (I'm using it to post this.) There's no new messages for 2 days now though. Is RSS still alive?

    On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:42:02 +0000, Mark wrote:

    According to FIFA, the FIFA Intercontinental Cup is a World Championship.

    From FIFA's web-site:

    "The battle for the ultimate annual club accolade, the FIFA Intercontinental Cup (Match 5) will be a one-off match, played in the same host nation as matches 3 and 4, to determine the club champions of the world for each calendar year."

    "Since it was first launched rCo as the FIFA Club World Championship in 2000 rCo the FIFA Intercontinental Cup has evolved to become the premier annual tournament in global club football, with the winners of the final match holding the crown of world champions for the next calendar year."

    Then they list all the World Champions and include Real Madrid 2024!

    https://www.fifa.com/en/tournaments/mens/intercontinentalcup/2024/articles/information-tournament-details

    If the FIFA Intercontinental Cup and the Club World Cup are both given equal status, then doesn't that prove that the Club World Cup is pretty meaningless now? Especially as we've now got 2 World Champions in the same year?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@noreply@pugleaf.net.invalid to rec.sport.soccer on Thu Dec 25 14:46:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:45:51 +0000, Mark wrote:

    On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:15:14 +0000, JesperLauridsen wrote:

    Testing to see if pugleaf is alive.

    Well I thought it was. (I'm using it to post this.) There's no new messages for 2 days now though. Is RSS still alive?

    Either pugleaf has died or rss has died. No new messages other than my own in 4 days now! Everybody's deserted me!

    Back on topic, according to Wikipedia we've now got 2 World Champions simultaneously. Somehow, the Club World Cup winners and PSG are both World Champions! As far as I'm aware, even FIFA aren't claiming that!

    On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:42:02 +0000, Mark wrote:

    According to FIFA, the FIFA Intercontinental Cup is a World Championship.

    From FIFA's web-site:

    "The battle for the ultimate annual club accolade, the FIFA Intercontinental Cup (Match 5) will be a one-off match, played in the same host nation as matches 3 and 4, to determine the club champions of the world for each calendar year."

    "Since it was first launched rCo as the FIFA Club World Championship in 2000 rCo the FIFA Intercontinental Cup has evolved to become the premier annual tournament in global club football, with the winners of the final match holding the crown of world champions for the next calendar year."

    Then they list all the World Champions and include Real Madrid 2024!

    https://www.fifa.com/en/tournaments/mens/intercontinentalcup/2024/articles/information-tournament-details

    If the FIFA Intercontinental Cup and the Club World Cup are both given equal status, then doesn't that prove that the Club World Cup is pretty meaningless now? Especially as we've now got 2 World Champions in the same year?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@Pammiesheart@yahoo.co.uk to rec.sport.soccer on Sat Dec 27 20:36:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Mark wrote:

    On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:45:51 +0000, Mark wrote:

    On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:15:14 +0000, JesperLauridsen wrote:

    Testing to see if pugleaf is alive.

    Well I thought it was. (I'm using it to post this.) There's no new
    messages for 2 days now though. Is RSS still alive?

    Either pugleaf has died or rss has died. No new messages other than
    my own in 4 days now! Everybody's deserted me!

    Apparently pugleaf has died! Still no new messages there other than my
    own for about 6 days! so I'm trying xananews, and there are other
    messages here. What's going on?

    I've only just found out whether Mark FC won the UPT League
    Championship or not!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@Pammiesheart@yahoo.co.uk to rec.sport.soccer on Sun Dec 28 13:54:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    If the FIFA Intercontinental Cup and the Club World Cup
    are both given equal status, then doesn't that prove that
    the Club World Cup is pretty meaningless now? Especially
    as we've now got 2 World Champions in the same year?

    Welcome to the real world... you finally got there!

    They've ALWAYS been meaningless competitions and only stupid
    people think otherwise. Those type of glorified friendly
    match-ups are good for sponsors and making a bit of money, but
    in the big scheme of things they are not important competitions
    at all.

    The Club World Cup was a meaningful tournament from 2000 to 2023
    surely? How can the world's number 1 sport not have a World
    Championship?

    Nothing FIFA do anymore is good for the game... they have an
    agenda and it's all about them, making money and Gianni Infantino
    lining his own pockets whilst boosting his ego at the same time.

    That's possibly true. The world's number 1 sport needs a meaningful
    World Championship, and we don't seem to have 1 anymore!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Blueshirt@blueshirt@indigo.news to rec.sport.soccer on Mon Dec 29 13:40:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Mark wrote:

    The Club World Cup was a meaningful tournament from 2000
    to 2023 surely?

    Nope. It was all about TV rights, sponsorship and money...

    As nice as winning a trophy is, most supporters in Europe
    would rather their team won the UEFA Champions League than
    the Club World Cup. So meaningful is not a word I'd use to
    describe those glorified exhibition tournaments.

    How can the world's number 1 sport not have a World
    Championship?

    It does. It has two. An annual championship and a quadrennial
    one. FIFA want the best of both worlds.

    More tournaments = more TV rights revenue.

    Nothing FIFA do anymore is good for the game... they have
    an agenda and it's all about them, making money and Gianni
    Infantino lining his own pockets whilst boosting his ego at
    the same time.

    That's possibly true. The world's number 1 sport needs a
    meaningful World Championship, and we don't seem to have 1
    anymore!

    Chelsea FC are the official 'FIFA Super Casino Cup' holders...
    there in no other tournament that provides winnings equal to
    the bags of US Dollars that the mighty blues picked up for
    their North American casino tour. - Even the FIFA World Cup 2026
    winners won't get as much prize money for winning the
    [allegedly] most important football trophy next summer.

    That tells you all you need to know about FIFA and their
    objectives re modern football. It's not about growing the game,
    it's about lining their own pockets.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Blueshirt@blueshirt@indigo.news to rec.sport.soccer on Mon Dec 29 13:43:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Mark wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    Either pugleaf has died or rss has died. No new messages
    other than my own in 4 days now! Everybody's deserted me!

    Apparently pugleaf has died! Still no new messages there
    other than my own for about 6 days! so I'm trying xananews,
    and there are other messages here. What's going on?

    Why use an online interface to access Usenet when you've
    a newsreader? That's like having a dog and barking yourself
    every time the postman comes up the path.

    It doesn't make any sense to me... and never did.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@Pammiesheart@yahoo.co.uk to rec.sport.soccer on Wed Dec 31 13:00:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    The Club World Cup was a meaningful tournament from 2000
    to 2023 surely?

    Nope. It was all about TV rights, sponsorship and money...

    As nice as winning a trophy is, most supporters in Europe
    would rather their team won the UEFA Champions League than
    the Club World Cup. So meaningful is not a word I'd use to
    describe those glorified exhibition tournaments.

    How can the world's number 1 sport not have a World
    Championship?

    It does. It has two. An annual championship and a quadrennial
    one. FIFA want the best of both worlds.

    More tournaments = more TV rights revenue.

    It only had 1 between 2000 and 2023 though. I've not heard any better suggestions for a World Club Championship than what we had then.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@Pammiesheart@yahoo.co.uk to rec.sport.soccer on Wed Dec 31 13:05:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    Either pugleaf has died or rss has died. No new messages
    other than my own in 4 days now! Everybody's deserted me!

    Apparently pugleaf has died! Still no new messages there
    other than my own for about 6 days! so I'm trying xananews,
    and there are other messages here. What's going on?

    Why use an online interface to access Usenet when you've
    a newsreader? That's like having a dog and barking yourself
    every time the postman comes up the path.

    It doesn't make any sense to me... and never did.

    I can see every message in a thread all on 1 page with an online
    interface. It makes it easier to read, and easier to find the messages
    I want to reply to, and easier to organize votes etc.

    Talking of which there's still no new messages on pugleaf.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Blueshirt@blueshirt@indigo.news to rec.sport.soccer on Wed Dec 31 19:32:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Mark wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Why use an online interface to access Usenet when you've
    a newsreader? That's like having a dog and barking yourself
    every time the postman comes up the path.

    It doesn't make any sense to me... and never did.

    I can see every message in a thread all on 1 page with an
    online interface. It makes it easier to read, and easier to
    find the messages I want to reply to, and easier to organize
    votes etc.

    But you keep saying there's no new messages on Pugleaf! So how
    can you reply to them?

    Talking of which there's still no new messages on pugleaf.

    See!

    Clearly your web interface to Usenet is unreliable. So why
    persist with it when you have a fully functioning newsreader
    on your computer?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Blueshirt@blueshirt@indigo.news to rec.sport.soccer on Wed Dec 31 19:32:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Mark wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    How can the world's number 1 sport not have a World
    Championship?

    It does. It has two. An annual championship and a quadrennial
    one. FIFA want the best of both worlds.

    More tournaments = more TV rights revenue.

    It only had 1 between 2000 and 2023 though. I've not heard
    any better suggestions for a World Club Championship than
    what we had then.

    Chelsea won that in 2022, but I still consider it a meaningless
    trophy at the end of the day. If you're in it, you want to win
    it obviously... but I would put their five Premier League titles
    and two Champions League triumphs above their Club World Cup
    victory.

    Of course, Chelsea FC's owners, sponsors and bank accounts might
    have a different opinion to me...
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From doctor@doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) to rec.sport.soccer on Wed Dec 31 23:47:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    In article <xn0pf78x5392ta0002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Mark wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    How can the world's number 1 sport not have a World
    Championship?

    It does. It has two. An annual championship and a quadrennial
    one. FIFA want the best of both worlds.

    More tournaments = more TV rights revenue.

    It only had 1 between 2000 and 2023 though. I've not heard
    any better suggestions for a World Club Championship than
    what we had then.

    Chelsea won that in 2022, but I still consider it a meaningless
    trophy at the end of the day. If you're in it, you want to win
    it obviously... but I would put their five Premier League titles
    and two Champions League triumphs above their Club World Cup
    victory.

    Of course, Chelsea FC's owners, sponsors and bank accounts might
    have a different opinion to me...

    Especially the glory seekers.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@Pammiesheart@yahoo.co.uk to rec.sport.soccer on Fri Jan 2 14:06:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    How can the world's number 1 sport not have a World
    Championship?

    It does. It has two. An annual championship and a quadrennial
    one. FIFA want the best of both worlds.

    More tournaments = more TV rights revenue.

    It only had 1 between 2000 and 2023 though. I've not heard
    any better suggestions for a World Club Championship than
    what we had then.

    Chelsea won that in 2022, but I still consider it a meaningless
    trophy at the end of the day.

    Why? The Championship of the World > the championship of a single
    continent or a single country. It's a far greater measure of success
    and prestige surely?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@Pammiesheart@yahoo.co.uk to rec.sport.soccer on Fri Jan 2 14:26:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Why use an online interface to access Usenet when you've
    a newsreader? That's like having a dog and barking yourself
    every time the postman comes up the path.

    It doesn't make any sense to me... and never did.

    I can see every message in a thread all on 1 page with an
    online interface. It makes it easier to read, and easier to
    find the messages I want to reply to, and easier to organize
    votes etc.

    But you keep saying there's no new messages on Pugleaf! So how
    can you reply to them?

    When it's working properly I can reply. I almost didn't see this
    message on my newsreader; it would have been directly underneath your
    other message in a web interface.

    Talking of which there's still no new messages on pugleaf.

    See!

    Clearly your web interface to Usenet is unreliable. So why
    persist with it when you have a fully functioning newsreader
    on your computer?

    Because it might work better in future.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Blueshirt@blueshirt@indigo.news to rec.sport.soccer on Fri Jan 2 16:53:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Mark wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Chelsea won that in 2022, but I still consider it a
    meaningless trophy at the end of the day.

    Why? The Championship of the World > the championship of
    a single continent or a single country. It's a far greater
    measure of success and prestige surely?

    No.

    It's not a true measure of greatness. Nobody, not even you,
    considers Chelsea FC to have been the best football team in
    the world when they won the FIFA Club World Cup in 2022 or 2025.
    So why would anyone apply that term to other teams that won it
    in other years? Either it counts for everyone, or it doesn't
    count at all.

    The 2025 FIFA SuperCasino Cup had more teams taking part in it
    than the old Inter-TotoContinental Cup, so in a way it was a
    more relevant way of judging success at club level... but even
    then, that tournament last summer didn't contain the current
    domestic Champions of England [Liverpool] Italy [Napoli] or
    Spain [Barcelona]... so how can it be a meaningful international
    tournament and taken seriously by real fans?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Blueshirt@blueshirt@indigo.news to rec.sport.soccer on Fri Jan 2 16:53:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Mark wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    I can see every message in a thread all on 1 page with an
    online interface. It makes it easier to read, and easier
    to find the messages I want to reply to, and easier to
    organize votes etc.

    But you keep saying there's no new messages on Pugleaf! So
    how can you reply to them?

    When it's working properly I can reply. I almost didn't see
    this message on my newsreader; it would have been directly
    underneath your other message in a web interface.

    New messages on your newsreader are highlighted in bold, unless
    you have changed the settings... using N to scroll through
    unread messages would take you through all new messages too.

    If you miss messages it's on how you use your newsreader, not
    the newsreader itself...which is fully functional and has plenty
    of user customisations available through the options settings.

    A web interface for Usenet is not superior to a dedicated
    newsreader used properly, and never will be.

    Talking of which there's still no new messages on pugleaf.

    See!

    Clearly your web interface to Usenet is unreliable. So why
    persist with it when you have a fully functioning newsreader
    on your computer?

    Because it might work better in future.

    It's a work in progress... so yes, it might. But if messages
    don't show up then it's not reliable. So you can't keep
    complaining if YOU choose to use an unreliable way to access
    Usenet and messages don't appear from time to time.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@Pammiesheart@yahoo.co.uk to rec.sport.soccer on Sun Jan 4 11:17:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Mark wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote:

    Chelsea won that in 2022, but I still consider it a
    meaningless trophy at the end of the day.

    Why? The Championship of the World > the championship of
    a single continent or a single country. It's a far greater
    measure of success and prestige surely?

    No.

    It's not a true measure of greatness. Nobody, not even you,
    considers Chelsea FC to have been the best football team in
    the world when they won the FIFA Club World Cup in 2022 or 2025.
    So why would anyone apply that term to other teams that won it
    in other years? Either it counts for everyone, or it doesn't
    count at all.

    Outsiders win Championships sometimes. Chelsea weren't the best team in
    Europe in 2012; Once Caldas probably weren't the best team in South
    America in 2004. Does that make the Champions League or the Copa
    Libertadores meaningless tournaments?

    The 2025 FIFA SuperCasino Cup had more teams taking part in it
    than the old Inter-TotoContinental Cup, so in a way it was a
    more relevant way of judging success at club level... but even
    then, that tournament last summer didn't contain the current
    domestic Champions of England [Liverpool] Italy [Napoli] or
    Spain [Barcelona]... so how can it be a meaningful international
    tournament and taken seriously by real fans?

    They were knocked out in the qualifiers (ie the Champions League) for
    the 2025 tournament. The qualifiers take time (approximately 4 years
    with the new format). Those teams are through to the next round of
    qualifiers for the 2029 tournament. All they need to do is win the
    Champions League in the next 3 years, or perform well enough to qualify
    through the ranking system, and they'll qualify for the 2029 tournament.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Blueshirt@blueshirt@indigo.news to rec.sport.soccer on Sun Jan 4 21:05:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Mark wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote:

    The 2025 FIFA SuperCasino Cup had more teams taking part in
    it than the old Inter-TotoContinental Cup, so in a way it
    was a more relevant way of judging success at club level...
    but even then, that tournament last summer didn't contain
    the current domestic Champions of England [Liverpool] Italy
    [Napoli] or Spain [Barcelona]... so how can it be a
    meaningful international tournament and taken seriously by
    real fans?

    They were knocked out in the qualifiers (ie the Champions
    League) for the 2025 tournament. The qualifiers take time
    (approximately 4 years with the new format). Those teams are
    through to the next round of qualifiers for the 2029
    tournament. All they need to do is win the Champions League in
    the next 3 years, or perform well enough to qualify through
    the ranking system, and they'll qualify for the 2029
    tournament.

    Bearing in mind Chelsea are owned by billionaire Yanks (a good
    criteria for friendly relations with FIFA) I think it's a pretty
    good bet that Uncle Gianni will find a way to 'qualify' Chelsea
    FC for the 2029 Club World Cup tournament regardless of whether
    they win the Champions League in the next few years or not. Just
    as FIFA found a way to get Messi into the 2025 tournament,
    Chelsea will probably be there in 2029 as holders.

    FIFA are as corrupt as fuck... the consortium of Chelsea owners
    have $$$... watch this space.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2