1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. rec.photo.digital

  • Was there a RAW setting for cameras which used film?

    From David B.@BD@hotmail.co.uk to rec.photo.digital on Sun Dec 28 13:35:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.photo.digital

    Was there a RAW setting for cameras which used film?

    This was the response received by Google's Gemini AI:-

    https://gemini.google.com/share/5edb51939e2e

    Do you agree with the answer given?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to rec.photo.digital on Sun Dec 28 14:57:21 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.photo.digital

    On 2025-12-28 14:35, David B. wrote:
    Was there a RAW setting for cameras which used film?

    This was the response received by Google's Gemini AI:-

    https://gemini.google.com/share/5edb51939e2e

    Do you agree with the answer given?

    Of course there was no RAW with film.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Geoff@geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org to rec.photo.digital on Mon Dec 29 12:55:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.photo.digital

    On 29/12/2025 2:35 am, David B. wrote:
    Was there a RAW setting for cameras which used film?

    This was the response received by Google's Gemini AI:-

    https://gemini.google.com/share/5edb51939e2e

    Do you agree with the answer given?

    Idiotic question, but the AI answer vaguely correct.

    Apart from its definition of Slide Film being something other than
    'raw', in the same way as negative film could be consided 'raw'.
    --
    geoff
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2