I tried posting on JLA, and ran into that problem in my first post. I
decided to not use them for another reason - they won't post usenet
messages with web links (other than to JLA, of course) - but seeing how
they butcher threads gave me another reason to avoid them.
I tried posting on JLA, and ran into that problem in my first post. I
decided to not use them for another reason - they won't post usenet
messages with web links (other than to JLA, of course) - but seeing how
they butcher threads gave me another reason to avoid them.
Will Dockery wrote:
Retro Guy wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Another good Usenet newsgroups portal is JLA Forums:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which sometimes
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce proper
references headers so that threading worked properly for those using a
newsreader.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the thread, >>> not the actual article being replied to, so no threading in newsreaders.
How's it looking, Retro Guy?
I'm not very well versed in these matters so I can't judge properly.
This reply that you just made looks fine, but I think you wrote this
from novaBBS.
If you scroll up in this thread to posts from Will-Dockery, you will see lines like:
LOL!
yesterday, andSorry, I typed and posted this during a Christmas party
the typo slipped in.
Consider it hereby corrected:
Where 'yesterday, and' is wrapped to a new line without quoting. It
breaks the quoting.
Another above:
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, whichsometimes
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce properusing a
references headers so that threading worked properly for those
newsreader.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in thethread,
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading innewsreaders.
where a bunch of lines have the same issue.
Jlaforum wraps the lines, but does not maintain the quote level, so they
look a mess in a newsreader (and novaBBS). Then when someone quotes that
in a newsreader, it looks like a bunch of lines are written by a
previous poster, not the person who actually quoted them. It's a mess.
It seems Jlaforum using web forum software that does not understand
quoting properly for Usenet. Sometimes I see stuff like, '[quote]' or '[/quote]' which is completely useless outside of the web forum
software, and looks a mess in a newsreader.
Basically, Jlaforum does not maintain Usenet quoting standards, and also
does not seem to maintain Usenet 'References: ' headers properly, which results in replies looking like they are to a different post than the
really are. So a newsreader can only go by this and it breaks threading
in a newsreader.
Plus, the dates are wrong, or at least they are not accurate, as they
are the date/time when the post was sent to giganews, not the date/time
when the user posted it. So when Jlaforum dumps their posts to giganews,
all the posts each dump get the same timestamp.
Not great for Usenet groups, but the software they use isn't made for
Usenet groups.
I tried posting on JLA, and ran into that problem in my first post. I
decided to not use them for another reason - they won't post usenet
messages with web links (other than to JLA, of course) - but seeing how
they butcher threads gave me another reason to avoid them.
Will Dockery wrote:
Another good Usenet newsgroups portal is JLA Forums:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which sometimes produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce proper
references headers so that threading worked properly for those using a newsreader.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the thread,
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading in newsreaders.
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
My first internet post was also to Usenet, back around July 1998.
The archived post still exists.
HTH and HAND.
Usenet is not the internet
It was an Internet site that was connected to Usenet.
You're just a sneering troll, basically good for nothing, Cujo.
I corrected you
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 18:09:52 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
I tried posting on JLA, and ran into that problem in my first post. I
decided to not use them for another reason - they won't post usenet
messages with web links (other than to JLA, of course) - but seeing how
they butcher threads gave me another reason to avoid them.
There are large gaps in the archives of JLA Forums also, unfortunately.
I found this out when making a post by post search through various
years, 2004-2008 and so on, and found many of my threads are missing.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (1 / 5) |
| Uptime: | 23:34:07 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
6 files (8,794K bytes) |
| Messages: | 186,852 |
| Posted today: | 1 |