• Lotto

    From Marmaduke Jinks@marmadukejinks99@gmail.com to rec.gambling.lottery on Thu Oct 9 12:05:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.gambling.lottery

    In Lotto news today https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/oct/09/richard-desmond-seeks-13m-claim-gambling-commission-uk-lottery

    I found the Gambling Commission useless when I wrote to them with an
    issue over prizes a few years ago. A Match4, on a "must be won" draw,
    should be worth at least 4 Match3s (there are 4 trebles in a fourfold). Camelot paid less than that. In effect you were "penalised" if you got
    4 right, you would be better off getting 4 Match3s - which you can never
    have. They do the x4 for the ordinary draw but not the one where
    punters buy the extra tickets in the "must be won" draw.

    Take Superdraw 3102
    https://lottery.merseyworld.com/archive/Lott3102.html
    Match3 -u86 - Match4 -u250 . Match 4 should be at least -u344. :-(

    Gambling Commission sided with Camelot, when I wrote. So I'd be happy
    if they got a good kicking.

    MJ
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ES Nigel@useweb@nospam.invelid to rec.gambling.lottery on Thu Oct 9 16:03:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.gambling.lottery

    Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
    In Lotto news today https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/oct/09/richard-desmond-seeks-13m-claim-gambling-commission-uk-lottery


    I found the Gambling Commission useless when I wrote to them with an
    issue over prizes a few years ago. A Match4, on a "must be won" draw, should be worth at least 4 Match3s (there are 4 trebles in a fourfold). Camelot paid less than that. In effect you were "penalised" if you got
    4 right, you would be better off getting 4 Match3s - which you can never have. They do the x4 for the ordinary draw but not the one where
    punters buy the extra tickets in the "must be won" draw.

    Take Superdraw 3102
    https://lottery.merseyworld.com/archive/Lott3102.html
    Match3 -u86 - Match4 -u250 . Match 4 should be at least -u344. :-(

    Gambling Commission sided with Camelot, when I wrote. So I'd be happy
    if they got a good kicking.

    MJ


    I'm no fan of the current mob. They no longer publish numbers in drawn
    order.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marmaduke Jinks@marmadukejinks99@gmail.com to rec.gambling.lottery on Fri Oct 10 18:30:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.gambling.lottery

    On 09/10/2025 16:03, ES Nigel wrote:
    Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
    In Lotto news today
    https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/oct/09/richard-desmond-seeks-13m-claim-gambling-commission-uk-lottery


    I found the Gambling Commission useless when I wrote to them with an
    issue over prizes a few years ago.-a A Match4, on a "must be won" draw,
    should be worth at least 4 Match3s (there are 4 trebles in a
    fourfold). Camelot paid less than that.-a In effect you were
    "penalised" if you got 4 right, you would be better off getting 4
    Match3s - which you can never have.-a They do the x4 for the ordinary
    draw but not the one where punters buy the extra tickets in the "must
    be won" draw.

    Take Superdraw 3102
    https://lottery.merseyworld.com/archive/Lott3102.html
    Match3 -u86 - Match4 -u250 .-a Match 4 should be at least -u344. :-(

    Gambling Commission sided with Camelot, when I wrote.-a So I'd be happy
    if they got a good kicking.

    MJ


    I'm no fan of the current mob. They no longer publish numbers in drawn order.

    Phew, that's a terrible indictment of their business model ;-)

    MJ
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ES Nigel@useweb@nospam.invelid to rec.gambling.lottery on Sat Oct 11 16:09:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.gambling.lottery

    Marmaduke Jinks wrote:

    On 09/10/2025 16:03, ES Nigel wrote:

    Marmaduke Jinks wrote:

    In Lotto news today
    https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/oct/09/richard-desmond-seeks-13m-claim-gambling-commission-uk-lottery


    I found the Gambling Commission useless when I wrote to them with an
    issue over prizes a few years ago. A Match4, on a "must be won"
    draw, should be worth at least 4 Match3s (there are 4 trebles in a
    fourfold). Camelot paid less than that. In effect you were
    "penalised" if you got 4 right, you would be better off getting 4
    Match3s - which you can never have. They do the x4 for the ordinary
    draw but not the one where punters buy the extra tickets in the "must
    be won" draw.

    Take Superdraw 3102
    https://lottery.merseyworld.com/archive/Lott3102.html
    Match3 -u86 - Match4 -u250 . Match 4 should be at least -u344. :-(

    Gambling Commission sided with Camelot, when I wrote. So I'd be
    happy if they got a good kicking.

    MJ


    I'm no fan of the current mob. They no longer publish numbers in drawn
    order.

    Phew, that's a terrible indictment of their business model ;-)

    MJ

    I'm testing a newish system that's showing promise. However it needs
    shedloads of historic data in drawn order :-(

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2